Why this liberal Obama voter won’t worry if SCOTUS strikes down the ACA

Last updated on: January 13, 2015 at 1:47 pm by Aziz Poonawalla

Why this liberal Obama voter won’t worry if SCOTUS strikes down the ACA 2015-01-13T13:47:01-07:00 Aziz Poonawalla

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare), moments prior to being struck down by the Supreme Court (image courtesy of wikimedia)

“If you strike me down, I shall become more powerful than you can possibly imagine….” — Obi-wan Kenobi to Darth Vader

The decision is due this Thursday – the Supreme Court is pondering the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”) due to the inclusion of an individual mandate, and it’s highly probable that the decision will be 5-4 strictly along party lines that the law is overturned, in full or in part.

You know, I’m okay with that.

This is not a fight I expected – I assumed that Republicans saw the individual mandate for what it was – a conservative idea, born in conservative thinktanks like the Heritage Foundation, and included in the law as a compromise by Democrats with an eye towards courting Republican support. Conceptually, the individual mandate is identical to Republican policies being promoted by current GOP leadership. The idea that the mandate is unconstitutional is laughable – even George Washington supported mandates. As Ezra Klein writes in The New Yorker, “What is notable about the conservative response to the individual mandate is not only the speed with which a legal argument that was considered fringe in 2010 had become mainstream by 2012; it’s the implication that the Republicans spent two decades pushing legislation that was in clear violation of the nation’s founding document.” Legal scholars are virtually unanimous on the validity of the mandate – and the expectation that it will be overturned anyway.

Put simply, the Supreme Court will engage in naked conservative judicial activism (again) when it rules the ACA invalid. And there will be a consequence.

For one thing, recall that the entire debate about passing health care reform was designed from the beginning by President Obama for compromise. He explicitly took prescription drug prices off the table, and then ruled out any sort of public option for insurance coverage. So at the very outset, Obamacare gave away bargaining positions in the hope of building a bipartisan consensus (which ultimately failed – it passed without a single Republican vote).

So, if the ACA is ruled unconstitutional by conservatives based on the mandate, itself a policy once promoted by conservatives and included in the law to appease conservatives, it’s clear that the lesson learned is: compromise with Republicans is pointless.

Make no mistake: health insurance reform MUST happen. As Klein puts it,

I don’t think it’s particularly controversial to say that the United States of America is, one day, going to have universal or near-universal health insurance. Having 50 million uninsured Americans, 25 million underinsured Americans, and 150 million Americans who are one layoff away from losing their health insurance is not a sustainable long-term equilibrium.

Instead of a gigantic catch-all law like the ACA that trioed to solve all the problems at once, and which could be undermined by Republicans during negotiations (and then killed by an activist SCOTUS anyway after passage), the way forward has to be: a. simple to explain, b. build off something that is already popular, and c. effective at increasing coverage first and foremost. The obvious solution is Medicare for All – allowing anyone to pay insurance premiums to the federal government for Medicare coverage.

Yes, losing the ACA will cause real short-term hardship, and that’s a genuine humanitarian issue. But it’s important to remember that this isn’t a deliberate abandonment of Obamacare in favor of some hypothetical “perfect” outcome. The Republicans are the ones with the initiative here. THEY chose this fight. I’d have preferred we never went down this road at all, but now that we are here, there’s no point in not planning for what’s next. And repealing Obamacare gives Democrats the perfect political leverage to make the case for Medicare for All that they couldn’t have two years ago when it wasn’t yet obvious that compromise and bipartisanship were dirty words as far as the GOP was concerned.

Related: Similar thinking along these lines from Robert Reich, about “health care jujitsu“. And another post at Dean2016 with more links and excerpts.

And here’s a primer on everything you need to know about the Supreme Court and Obamacare in one place.

Further, repeal of the Affordable Care Act might not be the cataclysm that some expect. Also, 11 facts about the Affordable Care Act that everyone should know.

Previous Post

June 6, 2012

Wisconsin recall aftermath: democracy wins

Next Post

July 18, 2012 devastating Obama ad on Mitt Romney and outsourcing

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Aziz For America Uncategorized

Select a Month December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 August 2018 July 2018 April 2018 November 2017 October 2017 July 2017 June 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 July 2016 June 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 June 2014 April 2014 March 2014 September 2013 July 2013 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the Bible's view of laziness?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A little sleep leads to poverty Laziness is good Rest is forbidden Only farmers can rest