Review: The Showings of Julian of Norwich

Last updated on: December 16, 2013 at 8:00 am by Niki Whiting

Review: The Showings of Julian of Norwich 2013-12-15T18:38:03-08:00 Niki Whiting

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Mirabai Starr, teacher of philosophy and world religions at the University of New Mexico – Taos, has taken on the challenge of translating the writings of a thirteenth century Christian mystic from England and bringing them to a modern audience. Apparently, Starr is “at the vanguard of the emerging Interspiritual movement,” a movement that I can’t seem to find a lot of direct information about, but seems to be a rather New Age blur of the three major monotheistic traditions, focusing on a God of Love. This is not exactly my cup of tea, for a variety of reasons, but it’s hard to criticize people actively working for interspiritual dialog and professing Love.

Some people may know the writings of Julian of Norwich by another name, The Revelations of Divine Love. This is how I’d read the work before. Having been deeply challenged and moved by this work in the past (this is either my third or fourth reading), I was looking forward to revisiting this text with new eyes, eyes both more deeply knowledgeable of the greater Christian tradition and now with a Pagan sensibility.

I approached this text with two questions in mind. The first question was: Does Starr accomplish her goal of bringing this work to a new audience? Here the answer is unequivocally, yes. I will admit that this is not my favorite translation of this work. In order to make this text, originally written in Middle English, relevant to a non-academic, non-theologically trained audience, I find the language quite watered down. I do not think Starr strays from Julian’s intent; I just find lacking a certain religious specificity and the beauty of slightly more formal language. I also noticed, when comparing translations, that occasionally some more problematic references (such as Jews being betrayers of Jesus, a perfectly normal reference in Julian’s time) are missing.

While I might quibble over the theological specifics here and there, both with Starr’s choices and what Julian has to say, I think this book is now made more accessible to the general Christian than the translation I prefer. Julian’s place in the wide river of the Christian tradition deserves to be understood. She is a mystic of exquisite optimism. In fact, I will be giving my copy of this book to my Christian mother-in-law. Christians who may never have picked up a book on medieval mystics may actually find that they get a lot out of this translation.

This brings me to my second question: Why should Pagans read this book? Honestly? There’s no need for Pagans to read this book. It’s not directly relevant and can seem quite long and repetitive, particularly if you don’t understand Julian’s context, both in time and Christian development. That said, this book may appeal to Pagans who are active in interfaith work or who have a strong mystical bent of their own. While firmly ensconced in traditional Christianity, Julian does express some remarkable views on sin and the Motherhood of Jesus; everything is love, All is Love and all shall be well. This book is essentially Unverified Personal Gnosis. The Catholic Church has never canonized Julian, but neither has she been censored. Her words are not doctrine, but they are available for the edification of those who would take her words to heart.

Julian’s revelations are spread out over 200 (nicely spaced) pages, yet the Motherhood of Jesus doesn’t make an appearance until the last quarter of the book. Yet, this is often what is most remarked upon when her writings are mentioned. The notion of Jesus as Mother was a profoundly radical idea in Julian’s time. I remember the first time I read this piece. I was shocked and amazed by this concept. The second time I read this I was wonderfully pleased. But now….. Now I find the concept theologically troubling. Once again, actual female-ness is usurped by a male. Jesus’s incarnated maleness and his divinity absorb all that was raised high and noble for females.

My recommendation for this book is that many Pagans won’t miss anything if they skip it. But if you want to explore a radical Christian text or dive into the mystic tradition, this would be a great translation to start with. If you’ve got a Christian in your life that needs some divine optimism or perhaps their understanding of the Christian tradition needs to be expanded, this would also be an excellent gift to give.

Previous Post

December 13, 2013

Singing In Christmas

Next Post

December 18, 2013 Pancha Ganapati: My Multi-Observant Holiday

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Alaska altar altars Ana Ancestors Anderson witchcraft Arddu Bhairava Biography bodies books Christianity Christmas community current events death Delphic Maxims Dhumavati dual observance Durga Faery family life feminism Feri Feri tradition Feri witchcraft food ganesha gratitude Guest Post guru health Hinduism holidays Jesus Kali Lakshmi land links magic Many Gods West movie review movies music my heart mystery myth Navratri Orthodoxy pagan pagan culture paganism pantheacon parenting Place politics polytheism practice pratice prayer Red Goddess review ritual sacred arts Samhain Saraswati Shinto Shiva singing Star Goddess Tantra tarot the Gods theory Uncategorized values virgin mary wales washington winter witchcraft year in review yoga

Select a Month September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the name of the disciple who replaced Judas Iscariot?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Silas Barnabas Matthias Timothy