Thoughts on Cyberspace

Last updated on: September 24, 2013 at 12:56 pm by Sterling

Thoughts on Cyberspace 2013-09-24T12:56:27+00:00 Sterling

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve been away for a couple of weeks, working extra hard at my “day job”. In the moments I’ve pulled away from the computer, stopped coding or coordinating code projects, I’ve found myself thinking a lot about the nature of Cyberspace. I’ve been wondering about the nature of that space within reality, and it’s role in magick and life.

The term “cyber” is so overused these days, so wishy washy and meaningless at this point. I almost feel like I should apologize for using the world Cyberspace at all. Honestly, though, there isn’t a better word that I can think of to describe the digital world we inhabit in our computers. Whether we are escaping into the made up world of a standalone single player game or into the shared space of Internet communications, Cyberspace as I’m defining it here is that layer of reality created in computer code, with no physical reality in our analog plane.

Things that happen in code may affect things that happen in the analog world directly or indirectly. Digital code can make a robot arm move or create music that can be heard through headphones or speakers. In that way, what happens in Cyberspace affects the analog world directly. When a few people sit around their computers in different parts of the world having a digital conversation, or when a group plays a multiplayer game online, the experience is shared in the minds of the participants. That experience may affect those people in analog ways, but only indirectly, through the medium of their brains. Experience moves from the digital world of code to the still digital world of the mind, and only then moves into the analog world through the actions of the person.

People have been writing about the magickal repercussions of computing since the early days of computers. Computers have led us down whole new pathways of exploration about the nature of thought, even for those who do not believe in magick at all. For those of us who believe that thought and magick are tightly intertwined, the nature of thought and the nature of a computer’s cogitation have always been questions of magickal importance.

Most of what I have read about the nature of Cyberspace and magick have considered the digital space to be the same as human thought from a magickal perspective. If you imagine the Kabbalistic Tree of Life, with analog physical reality at the bottom of the tree and the unreachable, unimaginable, ineffable form of deity at the very top of the tree, you might imagine ordinary thought as existing in the interface between analog reality and the level just above where our reality is nearly fully formed, but still just an abstraction of the final form. One school of magick teaches that through meditation and other ceremonial tasks, we can reach up through the tree to affect the formations in the level of reality just above ourselves in the tree, thereby changing reality here in physical realm we inhabit. The thinkers I have read have all suggested that work done in Cyberspace runs along the same lines and goes to the same place(s) UP the tree.

I’m not entirely sure that is correct. In fact, I’m leaning pretty strongly towards a view that the worlds we create in Cyberspace do not go up the tree, but rather down it. There are two possibilities here. One seems very uncontroversial to me. It is that we are creating another sub-tree inside our own reality. Kabbalists say that every sephira (think: circle of power) holds within it a complete tree of life. The controversial view that I’m also considering at this point is that the world(s) created by our computer based explorations are a whole new sephira on the tree.

Is it possible that we are actually creating a whole new level of reality? It’s not completely inconceivable. In the same way that we can only reach the levels of reality above us on the tree through mental experience, we are now reaching into Cyberspace through our minds. Also, as we both affect and are affected by the levels of reality above us on the tree, we may be creating reality one layer down and having the effects of that layer come through to our layer. We can’t fully move our physical selves into that other reality at this point in our technological development, but there are many theorists who consider the ways in which we could move our consciousness completely into the digital realm. This could be the action of our layer of reality creating a whole new layer. It could even give us some insight into the way that other layers of reality create the layers underneath them.

What would the difference be between a Cyberspace that is a whole new sephira versus a Cyberspace which represents a sub-tree in the tree of life? That’s a concept that could take an entire book to tease apart.

Previous Post

September 20, 2013

By the light of the harvest moon: autumn equinox thoughts

Next Post

September 26, 2013 Returning To America : Place As Cultural Experience

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Africa Amazon Ancestors Animism Austin Boots Across Ireland Boston boundary crossing Bretagne Children Cities Community Connection Culture Detroit Druidry Earth Edinburgh Elements England Eskdalemuir Eugene experiential family Fiction Florida folklore France Glasgow Heathenry home how to build it Human Spaces imaginary landscapes Introduction Ireland Journeys Know your wild herbs Land Spirits London Maine memory lane Naturalizing Nature's Metaphors New York Poetry Remembering Ancestors Sacred Spaces San Francisco Scotland Seasons Seattle Tanzania Technology Texas the South Theory Top 10 traditions Travel Uncategorized United States video Water West Virginia Witchcraft Worlding

Select a Month August 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was the name of Bathsheba’s husband?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nathan Uriah Abner Joab