Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Something Still Could: Courage for a Turbid Anniversary

Something Still Could: Courage for a Turbid Anniversary

Last updated on: August 29, 2026 at 12:12 am by Wyatt Reynolds

0 Comments

Something Still Could: Courage for a Turbid Anniversary 2026-08-29T00:12:24-04:00 Wyatt Reynolds

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“We hold these truths to be sacred & undeniable; that all men are created equal & independent, that from that equal creation they derive rights inherent & inalienable, among which are the preservation of life, & liberty, & the pursuit of happiness…” ~Jefferson’s Original Draft of the Declaration

“All honor to Jefferson—to the man who, in the concrete pressure of a struggle for national independence by a single people, had the coolness, forecast, and capacity to introduce into a merely revolutionary document, an abstract truth, applicable to all men and all times, and so to embalm it there, that to-day, and in all coming days, it shall be a rebuke and a stumbling-block to the very harbingers of re-appearing tyranny and oppression.” ~Abraham Lincoln, letter to Henry L. Pierce and others, 1859

The ethicist Luke Bretherton describes our moment as a kind of hot tub. In most eras of political conflict, one side or the other feels existentially threatened— its world, its way of life, even its very survival on the line. What is strange about now is that both sides feel that way at once. Everyone is in the water, and everyone is sure the temperature is being raised on them.[1] Amidst that scalding, anxious atmosphere the Declaration of Independence arrives at 250, and lands awkwardly. A nation that cannot agree on whether it is being saved or destroyed is not obviously in any position to throw a party for its founding. I’ve been thinking about this as I was considering what to write for my last Anxious Bench post before the Semiquincentennial.

I want to suggest a posture for the occasion, and I want to find it where I have spent most of a decade looking: among the people who had the least reason to celebrate the founding and refused, all the same, to surrender it. In doing so, I want to intertwine two stories. The first is about a document whose words outran the men who wrote them, and the readers who seized those words and meant them. The second reflects on a philosopher’s account of hope at the end of a world, and the Crow soldier who embodied it across rupture. Held together, they point past both the fireworks and the despair toward something more difficult and perhaps sturdier.

The document and its counter-readers

Throughout the Early Republic, Native nations and their evangelical allies did something that might strike us as strange. In the same decades that EuroAmericans were sacralizing Washington and canonizing the founders, Indigenous thinkers appealed to that very founding—to the Revolution, to the Declaration, and to the figure of Washington himself—turning these symbols against the policies of the settler republic that claimed them.

Consider Hendrick Aupaumut, the Mahican sachem who had served as a captain in Washington’s Continental Army. Explaining in 1791 why he would undertake a dangerous peace mission for the new United States, he told the federal commissioner that he had no territory and no liberty to fight for, “for liberty I always possessed.” It is a small detonation. The Revolution, in Aupaumut’s telling, had not bestowed liberty on Indigenous peoples; it had encountered them as its prior possessors. The founding’s own language of natural right became, in his mouth, an indictment of the nation invoking it.[2]

The same move recurs across the coalition defending Indian rights, whom I write about. In an 1830 petition defending Cherokee rights in the face of Indian Removal, the citizens of Castine, Maine, did not merely cite the Declaration. “And believing that the performance of our solemn compacts, constitutionally made, is a duty paramount to every consideration of expediency, we may ‘appeal to the Supreme Judge of the world, for the rectitude of our intentions, when we solemnly declare,’ that the plighted faith of the nation shall be preserved inviolate, and may place ‘a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence,’ to preserve us from unhappy consequences.” The grammar is the argument. The Castine petitioners do not quote the Declaration about the Cherokee. They speak it as if signing it again, with the Cherokee cause as the new occasion of solemn declaration. White New Englanders in February 1831 stand in the rhetorical posture of Jefferson and the Continental Congress and apply that posture to their own government as the new tyranny against which a “firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence” must be placed.[3]

And in 1836, in Boston, the Pequot minister William Apess delivered his “Eulogy on King Philip.” Apess stages Metacom as the elder figure to whom Washington must be compared—with Philip as “the greatest man that was ever in America”—and finds the comparison unflattering to Washington. The original American founding, in the Eulogy, is not 1776 but 1620. The Pilgrim landing at Plymouth is the doleful tragedy that inaugurates American history, and 1776 is the moment when that tragedy could have been repented of and was not.[4]

These were neither naïve patriots nor cynics. They performed a cross-grained reading of the founding, holding it to its own stated terms. This reading rested on a claim about the document itself, the very claim Lincoln would make decades later in this piece’s epigraph. The Declaration’s words outran the intentions of the men who wrote them. “All men are created equal” meant, in 1776, free men of property, and everyone knew it. But the sentence did not say that. Lincoln saw what Jefferson had done, perhaps without fully meaning to: created a rebuke (even to himself) timed unintentionally to detonate in every coming day. The distance between what the sentence said and what its authors meant became a standing invitation to everyone it was never meant to include.

The historian Vincent Brown, near the end of Ken Burns’s recent documentary on the Revolution, names this move in the present tense. The principle that government rests on the consent of the governed, he argues, was radical then and remains radical now; and as for the claim that all are created equal—Jefferson plainly did not take it seriously. “But I do.”[5] Two words, laying claim to a promise its author never meant to keep. That is precisely what Aupaumut and Apess and the Cherokee memorialists were doing a century and a half before him, and what Lincoln did between them: not inheriting the founders’ meaning but seizing the founders’ words and meaning them for themselves.

Radical hope and the war chief

Plenty Coups, 1908

Now to our other story. The philosopher Jonathan Lear builds his book Radical Hope around a single sentence from the Crow chief Plenty Coups, spoken near the end of his life: “When the buffalo went away the hearts of my people fell to the ground, and they could not lift them up again. After this nothing happened.”[6]

Lear refuses to read those last four words as mere depression. He takes them literally. When the Crow were confined to a reservation where neither hunting nor war was possible, it was not simply that certain actions were forbidden. Rather, the actions themselves had ceased to make sense—the way ordering dinner would lose its meaning in a world where restaurants, and the very word “ordering,” had vanished. That is the difference between a de facto impossibility and a radical one: the collapse not of an option but of the concepts that made any option meaningful. It was the threat Removal carried for the nations I study, also—not only the theft of land but the unmaking of a world in which their categories could still operate.

What Plenty Coups found on the far side of that collapse is what Lear calls radical hope: that is, one directed toward a future good the hopeful cannot yet conceive, a goodness for which one does not yet possess the concepts to comprehend. He counseled cooperation with the United States not from love or trust but because it was the only course that “might save our beautiful country for us,” and he sent young Crow to the universities on the same logic—with the white man’s knowledge he can oppress us, and only by learning it can we keep him from oppressing us again. This is hope with its eyes open, and it survived in a way Plenty Coups himself probably could not have guessed.[7]

Joseph Medicine Crow, 2009

Consider Joe Medicine Crow. Born in 1913 and raised in the warrior tradition on the Crow reservation—coming of age while Plenty Coups still served as principal chief—he was a living link to the last generation that remembered the buffalo. His grandfathers and the old men of the tribe raised him on the discipline of warriors who could no longer be warriors: they bathed him in icy rivers, drilled him in endurance, and told him the stories of his ancestors. To become a war chief in the old way, a Crow man had to accomplish four deeds: lead a successful war party, take an enemy’s weapon, steal an enemy’s horse, and touch a living enemy and come away unharmed (this last was to “count coup”). By the twentieth century no Crow had earned the title in recent memory; the conditions that gave the deeds their meaning had vanished with the buffalo, exactly as Plenty Coups had said.

Then Medicine Crow went to Europe as a soldier with the U.S. Army’s 103rd Infantry Division, and without setting out to do it, he completed all four tasks. He led a war party. He crept into a German encampment at night and stampeded off some fifty horses, singing a Crow war song as he rode away under fire. And in an alley in a French village he came face to face with an enemy soldier, knocked the rifle from the man’s hands—and, having him at his mercy, let him live. He had touched a living enemy and walked away. He did not realize what he had done until he came home and told the elders, the same men who had trained him, who heard the four deeds in his account and recognized that he had become, in the middle of the twentieth century, a war chief of the Crow Nation.

This is radical hope made flesh, and it rhymes with the counter-reading of the Declaration. The counter-readers seized words that were never meant for them and turned the language of the founding against those who sought to disenfranchise them; theirs was an inheritance claimed against the will of those who left it. Medicine Crow did something closer to the opposite. He received what had always been his and carried it forward when the world that gave it meaning was gone. And yet the two rhyme, because Plenty Coups could not have pictured a battlefield in France, an enemy in field-grey, or a coup counted in the wreckage of the Third Reich. That is the whole point. The concept survived the death of the world that first gave it meaning and reappeared in a form none of its mourners could have specified—carried across the rupture not by a document but by relationships, handed from elders to a boy who would reactivate it on a strange ground. Where Vincent Brown reactivates a sentence, Joe Medicine Crow reactivates a deed; the one lays hold of an inheritance written to exclude him, the other of one whose world had ended. Both are present-tense claims on something that should, by every reasonable measure, have been closed to them.

A Declaration worth resurrecting

So here are the two stories; one is a seizure and the other an inheritance, one turns a document against its authors and the other keeps faith with the dead. A text whose words outran its authors, claimed by the very people it was written to exclude. A way of life whose central concept outlived the world that birthed it, carried forward by an heir across the abyss. What rhymes is the shape of the thing: in both, a meaning that should have died with its origin instead outlived it and came back wearing a face nobody could have drawn in advance.

The counter-reading never stopped. Frederick Douglass asked in 1852 what the Fourth of July could mean to the slave, and then laid claim to it anyway. Chief Joseph carried the Declaration’s language into the pages of the North American Review. Martin Luther King Jr. stood on the Mall in 1963 and called the founding promises a check returned for insufficient funds—and demanded payment all the same. Each seized a memory at a moment of danger. And the form of hope keeps finding new bodies: years later, in response to the first exhibition at Chicago’s Field Museum curated by a Crow woman, Nina Sanders, a tribal elder told her at the closing ceremony that she had counted coups that day. She had. The action Removal was supposed to have ended for good had simply found another field.[8]

Which is why I want at this anniversary neither to discuss restoration nor amendment but resurrection—a word that carries, for those of us formed in the church, its full freight. Resuscitation returns the same body unchanged. Resurrection returns the same body transfigured: continuous with what died and yet unrecognizable, its shape impossible to specify before it arrives. The Declaration that a teetering, hot-tub world needs is not the 1776 document scrubbed to an imagined purity, nor the same document tinkered with at the margins. It is a Declaration resurrected—roomier, more faithful to the nascent truths Lincoln saw in it than its authors ever managed to be, with space for the radical hopes of people they never imagined and a chaos unlike what they had to face. We cannot say now what it will look like. That is not the weakness of the hope. It is the hope.

Plenty Coups said that after the buffalo went away, nothing happened. He was telling the truth about a world that had ended, and he was wrong about the one that came after, because his own steadfastness and the elders’ refusal to let the old words die, made it possible for a boy to count coup in France and a curator to count coup in Chicago. That is faith in the form the letter to the Hebrews names it: the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. To celebrate this turbid anniversary is not to pretend the founding was clean, or that the water is not rising. It is to stand in the scalding commons and insist, against the evidence and with a ragamuffin coalition of the unexpected, that after all this something still can happen. That is perhaps a birthday worth keeping and even celebrating.

[1] https://open.spotify.com/episode/6mLTltIedx1nv8ptQOCAsH?si=Lu6Ljb9cRjO8ij99FQP-BA

[2] https://www.jstor.org/stable/30043308

[3] Petition of the Citizens of Castine, Maine February, 1831 (photographs in the author’s possession, originals in HR21A-H[X] (RG 233.15)

[4] Apess, William. On Our Own Ground: The Complete Writings of William Apess, a Pequot. Edited by Barry O’Connell. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 1992.

[5] https://newlinesmag.com/review/a-remarkable-retelling-of-an-improbable-revolt/

[6] Lear, Jonathan. Radical Hope: Ethics in the Face of Cultural Devastation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006. p 12

[7] Ibid.

[8] https://socialconcerns.nd.edu/virtues/magazine/radical-hope-retrospective-an-interview-with-jonathan-lear/

Previous Post

June 8, 2026

History as Christian Discipleship

Next Post

June 10, 2026 Marilyn Monroe and the Life of the Mind

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"The TV sitcom BEWITCHED was an old favorite of mine"

philipjenkins

How Scotland Gave Us Our Modern ..."

"From now on whenever I see a clipper ship, see a certain brand of Scottish ..."

Terry

How Scotland Gave Us Our Modern ..."

"There are no such things as witches. They were just unmarried or elderly women with ..."

Dot Newkirk

How Scotland Gave Us Our Modern ..."

"The book of THE KEEP is wonderful, but I was not such a fan of ..."

philipjenkins

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: 2 John is addressed to Gaius, the beloved friend.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE