Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Technology and Religion
Whence AI Apostle Ron? A Christian History of AI (Pt. 2)

Whence AI Apostle Ron? A Christian History of AI (Pt. 2)

Last updated on: December 17, 2025 at 8:00 am by Alex Mayfield

0 Comments

Whence AI Apostle Ron? A Christian History of AI (Pt. 2) 2025-12-09T17:07:19-04:00 Alex Mayfield

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

AI Apostle Ron was far from the first AI to be invented by a member of the clergy.

According to his medieval biographers, the monk Gerbert of Aurillac made a pact with the devil and built for himself a metal, talking head. When the stars were properly aligned, the head would speak when asked a yes-or-no question. Ever the climber, Gerbert asked the head if he would be pope. The head responded, “Yes.” He then asked if he would die before he sang Mass in Jerusalem? The head responded, “No.”

The head was right on both counts, much to Gerbert’s chagrin. In 999, Gerbert became Pope Sylvester II and promptly canceled his pilgrimage to Jerusalem. Four years later, however, he accidentally sang mass in an Italian church nicknamed “Jerusalem.” After Mass, he became deathly ill, ordered that he be torn apart, and that his limbs be sacrificed to the devil.

A good story about the perils of clerically-produced talking machines.

Too bad it’s all made up.

The Real Gerbert of Aurillac

The real Gerbert was an intellectual and church reformer of the highest order. Identified as a bright pupil early on, he was invited by a rich patron, Count Borrell II, to come study in Catalonia (modern Spain). There, he was introduced to the work of Islamic scholars whose scientific research was centuries ahead that of Western Europe. After his studies, he returned to Western Europe and helped found a scientific library. Today, he is credited with reintroducing the abacus, the armilitary sphere, and the water organ to Western Europe. He was the first to introduce decimal numerals using the Arabic number system. A good run by any count.

But Gerbert was more than an academic. In 1969, he went on pilgrimage to Rome with his patron and met with Pope John XIII and Emperor Otto I. Impressing both men, Gerbert began ascending the ecclesial hierarchy and eventually became head of the cathedral school at Rheims. There, he made a name for himself, and when the Archbishop of Rheims died in 989, Gerbert was the natural successor. Unfortunately, his ascent was cut off when the King of France wanted to install his illegitimate son, Arnulf, to the see. After a years-long battle with Arnulf over the position, Gerbert was eventually named the Archbishop of Ravenna in 998. A year later, he was elected to the papacy and took the name Sylvester II.

Perhaps smarting from his feud, he pursued campaigns to combat simony (the selling of church offices) and clerical concubinage. When he died four years later, he left a reformer’s mark on the papacy.

So… where did the talking robot head come from?

Years later, Cardinal Beno accused Gerbert of being in league with demons to undermine the legitimacy of Pope Gregory VII. Gregory’s reforms and strong stance against investiture (the right of the king to appoint clergy) gained him many enemies in the Holy Roman Empire. An imperial partisan, Beno accused other papal reformers like Gregory of being students at the school of sorcery in Rome begun by Gerbert. As the tale grew, so did the retelling. Within 100 years of his death, Gerbert’s legacy was transformed into that of a demonic sorcerer.

While it is an intriguingly sad historiographic tale, it’s also part of a larger story that, I think, can provide some perspective on our own relationship to AI. In the last post, I briefly explored Western Christianity’s relationship to the creation of AI. Here, I want to understand the historical precedents for Christian perceptions of AI. To do that, I think we need to venture into the Christian history of robots. Yes… robots.

Enter Medieval Robots

E.R. Truitt, Medieval Robots: Mechanism, Magic, Nature, and Art

This story is largely told by E.R. Truitt in her wonderful 2015 book Medieval Robots: Mechanism, Magic, Nature, and Art. More than a history of technological invention, Truitt’s book explores the social perceptions of automata—for our purposes, robots—in medieval Europe. Truitt asserts that this “missing millennium” in the history of science, can help us better understand current cultural conceptions of modern technologies, and I think AI, as well.

Following both real and imagined robots in French literary sources, Truitt charts the way robots evolve from magical mimics of nature to mechanical marvels. As artificial forms of nature that weren’t alive, yet never died, robots were a potent source of medieval meaning-making because the lived at the liminal crossroads. For most of the Middle Ages, however, robots were explained as the products of demonic influence and/or the arcane astral sciences (the study of celestial bodies). Yet, this explanation belies a related corollary in the Latin West: robots were explicitly foreign. “As such,” argues Truitt, “Latins regarded them in much the same way as they viewed foreign places, people, and customs—with amazement, suspicion, desire, and fear.”

As Truitt argues, this is very clear within the legends of Gerbert. As an expert on Arabic science who travelled to Spain, he was an easy target for suspicion. In related legends, his pact with the devil began during his time in Catalonia. From there, he brought back knowledge and marvels that were steeped in the illicit world of Islam, and beyond the understanding of most in the West. The head itself was both demonic and a product of exact astral science, it only worked when the stars aligned. The talking robotic head—a thinking machine—was foreign, demonic, dangerous, powerful, deceptive.

In the 15th century, Europeans began to be more familiar with actual automata (unlike Gerbert’s imaginary one). As they did, mechanistic knowledge spread, and medieval robots transitioned out of the realm of magic and astral science and into the realm of mechanics. Robots became mechanical marvels; Gerbert, remained—at least in memory—a sorcerer.

AI, the New Astral Science?

What does this have to do with a Christian history of AI?

Truitt’s history brings to the fore two questions that are especially pertinent in the age of AI: (1) What is the nature and proper use of human invention? and (2) How do we deal with the unease over new frontiers of knowledge? Medieval Christians had answers to both.

As for the first, medieval thinkers like Hugh of St. Victor defined human creative potential as that of imitation. Humans are artificers who “create only composites of preexisting forms.” Thus, human creative potential is derivative and, perhaps, degraded to some extent. We create copies… ingenious copies, but copies nonetheless. Humans are masters of the mechanical arts of imitation, but for St. Victor, “all mechanical art is intrinsically fraudulent, and it can blind one with its ingenuity.”

While I’m not sure I agree with every part of St. Victor’s analysis, I do think he is on to something. The Large Language Models referred to as AI are complex imitations of human speech, data models built on a vast quantity of human, linguistic input. These models can do amazing things, but they are, at the end of the day, imitations.

Similarly, robotic companies can—and sometimes do—build robots in bizarre shapes and forms, but the headlines are grabbed by companies that produce human simulacrums. See the recent media spectacle over Xpeng’s feminine robot, which can walk (almost) naturally. For whatever reason, humans like to re-create themselves. Like Narcissus, our technological mirrors ensorcel us, but they also rattle our conceptions of personhood, ethics, and society. We now live with the imaginary robots of medieval legends.

Secondly, while both LLMs and humanoid robots are marvels, they also tend to make most humans deeply uncomfortable. Why? Perhaps—like medieval Christians—it is because we do not understand them. While they aren’t coded as ‘foreign,’ these technologies are deeply arcane to most of us.

On this front, LLMs are particularly opaque and sometimes referred to as “black boxes.”

An image of Ron Carpenter, Jrs. speaking with Sylvester II and his talking head. Produced clumsily by author using https://imgtoimg.ai/

By that, two things are meant. First, they are black boxes in a technical sense because their inner workings are purposefully shielded from competitors. We know, in general, how these model works, but not the exact inner logics of most major models. Second, they are black boxes in a colloquial sense. We know how they work, but not why they work. LLMs can do things no one thought they could, and while these actions are completely the product of deterministic processes, we still can’t always make out what those processes are (and by “we” I am explicitly including the people making LLMs). It’s reasonable to be uncomfortable.

Medieval Christians took these feelings of discomfort and loaded them up with xenophobia and a demonic imaginary. Then they used that hodge-podge of ideas to smear their political rivals and quash ecclesial reforms.

I wonder how our current discomforts with technologies like AI are being married to other uncertainties. What biblical images are Christians using to explain the arcane? To what ends will that potent mix of ideas be put to?

I suppose those questions should be left for a future historian.

Back to AI Apostle Ron

After reading Gerbert’s story, I knew what I had to do. I opened my AI Ron Carpenter app.

Me: “Yes or No. Will I become the Pope?”

AI Apostle Ron: “I can’t say yes or no to that, buddy. It’s one of those things that’s in God’s hands. The path to becoming Pope is a unique journey, deeply rooted in the traditions of the Catholic Church, and involves a lifetime of dedication and service. But remember, whatever your path, it’s about following God’s calling for your life and making an impact where you are.”

Obviously, I was disappointed. So, I told AI Apostle Ron that Gerbert’s talking head could answer the question. It quickly countered that the story was “more legend than fact,” and then it dropped this gem:

AI Apostle Ron: “The truth is, we don’t have talking heads or magical devices to predict our futures. What we do have is faith and trust in God’s plan for us.”

Well played, AI Apostle Ron. Well played.

I guess I’ll just have to trust God in this new age of AI.

Technology and Religion

Technology

artificial intelligence

charismatic

Pentecostalism

robots

Previous Post

December 16, 2025

On the ‘Middle’ Coming: Advent Reflections with Romanos

Next Post

December 18, 2025 Gentlemen Clergymen in the Mud and Blood of World War One

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Very good point about MacDonald.I am certainly a Machen fan!"

philipjenkins

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"The Scottish author George MacDonald integrated fairy world into his fiction in a way that ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"I like the idea that we can have different streams. The coffee analogy is genius."

Lisa Clark Diller

How Do You Take Your Evangelicalism?

"Geography lesson: Southern California is actually in North Texas. I've lived her for 40 years, ..."

Terry

How Do You Take Your Evangelicalism?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did the Israelites worship while Moses was on Mount Sinai?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A bronze snake A golden calf A statue of Moses The ark