Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
History and Religion
I’m Only Human: Sin as the Rejection of Human Nature

I’m Only Human: Sin as the Rejection of Human Nature

Last updated on: September 16, 2025 at 2:00 am by Adam Renberg

0 Comments

I’m Only Human: Sin as the Rejection of Human Nature 2025-09-15T08:25:36-04:00 Adam Renberg

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

How should we think about our flaws and misbehavior? For some, flaws are something to be embraced: we should be loved ‘warts and all’. For others, imperfections are simply based on our birthdays, an unavoidable result of our zodiac signs (“sorry I am late, I’m a Pisces!”). Or most nefariously, sin is justified as a natural part of one’s sex — “boys will be boys” – and thus certain bad behaviors are deemed as normative.

All of these answers have a common assumption: imperfections and sins are an inevitable part of what makes us human and thus should be excused rather than addressed. Thus, wicked actions are allowed to flourish while the perpetrator can simply throw up their hands and yell, “I’m only human,” thereby denying any responsibility. Christians, of course, should reject this notion—Adam and Eve were sinless before the fall and they were still human. Surely sin, therefore, is not part of human nature, but an accident to it! But this might not go far enough in reforming our conceptions. Perhaps, with Origen of Alexandria, we should view sin as a rejection of human nature.

Origen on the Image of God

Origen of Alexandria was an influential priest, theologian, and biblical scholar from the third century, famous for his biblical exegesis and ambitious theological system (for a discussion of his exegetical assumptions, see my last post). Amidst my research on Origen’s theological anthropology for my next monograph, I have been struck by his discussion of sin as a denial of what it means to be human. But, to discuss this, we must first understand how Origen conceives of human nature. Thus, we must begin with a brief sketch of his theology of the image of God.

First, drawing from Colossians 1:15, Origen claims the image of God is none other than the eternal Son of God himself (see: On First Principles I.2.6). His image theology begins not with anthropology but with Christology. Second, Origen claims humans ‘are an image of an image, since the Son is the image’ (On Prayer 22.4). We are made to be like Christ in particular. Third, the image of God is assigned to the soul alone, not to the body or even the whole human person (see: Homilies on Leviticus 4.3). Fourth, while humans are created in the image of God at the beginning, they put on the image by conforming themselves to the true image, the Son of God, in virtuous living. Or conversely, they put on another image through a life of vice, what Origen terms ‘the image of the earthly’, thereby obscuring the image of God. Humanity is always moving towards an image, it just might be the wrong one.

In sum, to be ‘human’ for Origen, is to be like Christ. Thus, we become human the more we are “conformed to the image of his Son” (Romans 8:29), mirroring his heavenly and holy nature.

What Are We Imaging?

If you put on the ‘image of God’ through virtue, you put on the ‘image of the earthly’ through vice. Origen discusses this in a striking way in his exegesis of Ezekiel 14:4 and Leviticus 17:8, which contains an odd grammatical construction in the version that Origen uses (the Septuagint, a Greek translation of the Old Testament). Origen quotes from Ezekiel: “Thus says the Lord Adonai: Human-human of the house of Israel, who shall conceive his devices in his heart … I the Lord will answer him according to the things in which his mind is entangled…”

No, ‘human-human’ is not a mistranslation—the Greek version has repeated ‘human’ twice here: λέγει κύριος: ἄνθρωπος ἄνθρωπος. Origen probes into why ἄνθρωπος, which means ‘human’, is written two times.

So why does he say: “man-man,” and what is the significance of the double mention of the term man? It seems to me that this should not be passed over in silence. The apostle teaches that there is an “inner man” and an “outer man,” and the former is being “renewed from day to day according to the image of the man who created him”; but the latter is visible and is being corrupted (Homily on Numbers 24, 2.1).

Origen reads these words in Ezekiel in light of 2 Corinthians 4:16, which provides a sort of blueprint for human composition in his thought. Humans are made up of “dual aspects,” with the “outer human being” referring to the body and the “inner human being” referring to the soul (See: Commentary on Romans 2.13.34). In other words, ‘human-human’ is shorthand for our twofold nature: ‘human (body)-human (soul).’

But just because it says ‘human-human’ in Ezekiel 14, doesn’t mean that all human beings hold both titles. Origen writes,

“All men are born men, but we are not all “men-men,” … Be men-men, namely, because not all are men-men. Let us show from the Scriptures why some are not men-men. “When the man was in honor, he did not understand; he ‘has been compared with foolish beasts and he has been likened to them” [Psalms 49:12]. That is not a man-man but a beast-man, “Generation of vipers, who warned you to flee from the coming wrath?” [Matthew 3:7]. This type is not a man-man but a serpent-man. “The horses have become mad for the females, each one was neighing for his neighbor’s wife” [Jeremiah 5:8]. That one is not a man-man but a horse-man” (Homilies on Ezekiel 3.8).

A 13th century illustration in the “Treatise on the Vices” by William Peraldus. It depicts sins as animals and vices as a combination of animals.

Origen employs various passages of scripture that compares humans’ vicious behavior to animals to claim these people are imaging something other than God. While the body is human, the ‘inner human’—the soul—is not human insofar as it has conformed itself to sin and evil rather than God. Thus, an unrepentant sinner might be a ‘beast-man’ or a ‘serpent-man’ or a ‘horse-man’, but not a ‘man-man’—to be a sinner is to reject that which makes you fully human, Christ.

The way to be ‘human-human’, therefore, is act like Christ.

When it has recovered its form in which God made it in the beginning, and when it has received the beauty of its previous form by the restoration of the virtues; then it can offer vows to God and then it will no longer be called merely a “man,” but a “man-man” (Homilies on Numbers 24, 2.1).

To recover the image of God, and therefore become a human in body and soul, is to engage in a spiritual program aimed at overcoming sin. Origen provides a training regime in this passage which discuss building virtue and good character, training in ‘divine principles of education’, seeking after God’s wisdom, and attaining ‘knowledge of the Scriptures’ (Homilies on Numbers 24, 2.2). When one rejects sin and pursues Christ “the inner man has persevered in the image of the Creator,” and “a man is born.” Thus, that one “becomes, according to the outer and inner man, a double man-man” (Homilies on Ezekiel 3.8).

I’m Only Human

While sin might be unavoidable in this fallen world, at least according to Paul (Romans 7:14-25), this does not mean we should assign sin to human nature. In fact, this has a tendency not only to normalize sin, but to institutionalize it. As followers of a holy God, sin is always to be addressed and overcome in repentance—not glossed over or shrugged at. Perhaps, learning from Origen, we should reconceptualize the relationship between sin and human nature. No, sin is not what makes us human—it is what denies our true humanity. Thus, we should not employ the phrase “I’m only human” after sinning to avoid blame, but rather in the context of virtuous actions. I’m only human when I love my neighbor well. I’m only human when I overcome sinful desires. I’m only human when I conform my life to Christ.

History and Religion

theological anthropology

Previous Post

September 12, 2025

Toward Healing? Teaching the Reformation in Mixed Company

Next Post

September 17, 2025 Why Is It So Hard to Do Pentecostal History?

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"The book of THE KEEP is wonderful, but I was not such a fan of ..."

philipjenkins

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"A similar film from the late 80s was The Hidden with Kyle MacLachlan. I get ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"Life Force is a guilty pleasure of mine! Not a great film, but a fun ..."

philipjenkins

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"I love horror but would have to acclimate back to Lovecraft and especially Machen. Have ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What animals were Daniel thrown to for worshiping God?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Bears Wolves Lions Dogs