Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Faith And Reconciliation After A Horribly Bitter Election

Faith And Reconciliation After A Horribly Bitter Election

Last updated on: November 7, 2024 at 12:35 am by Philip Jenkins

0 Comments

Faith And Reconciliation After A Horribly Bitter Election 2024-11-06T08:32:47-04:00 Philip Jenkins

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Did you hear about the election they just had in the US? It actually got quite a bit of coverage.

So is there anything new to say about it? Well, I might have something different to say, because I am working with 20-20 lack-of-foresight. To be precise, I am writing a week before the election, and have no clue which of the two candidates, whom I will call Smith or Jones, is going to win. That gives me a wonderful impartiality in what I have to say. By the time you read this, democracy will have democked, and you definitely know that Smith won, but I don’t, and I am not going to update anything I write to reflect the actual outcome of the election when it does occur.

So what do we do next? I am thinking specifically of the religious angle of the question. What, if anything, should Christians be doing now, right after the election? This question occurred to me when my own Episcopal church in Pennsylvania announced special opportunities for prayer and reflection on the eve of the ballot. The church announced that it “will hold a worship service to come together as a community, offer prayers, and find comfort during this time of stress and uncertainty.” On election day itself, the church remained open all day “for individual prayer and reflection.” That was a superb idea, although I was concerned about what the content of some of those prayers might have been: was it a ferocious “Lord, smite them as the Amalekites! Let them be unto you as publicans and sinners!” Seriously, were people just praying for victory for their particular cause?

Maybe I misjudge them. Maybe they really were praying for peace, justice, and reconciliation. I’d love to think so. In my street, many houses have yard signs declaring support for either party, except for one belonging to a Mennonite minister that says just “Be kind,” citing Ephesians 4.32. What an idea.

Towards Reconciliation

So what next? What should be the course for anyone who believes in a religion of peace, forgiveness, and reconciliation? Here follow a couple of suggestions. I am addressing them as much to myself as anyone else because, as I say, I don’t presently know who will win.

Most fundamentally, I really think Christians get far too invested in fighting for the causes of Smith or Jones, Tweedledumb or Tweedledee, as if it somehow mattered in the grand divine scheme, any more than (say) the war between the Houses of York and Lancaster did five hundred years ago. It is a deadly error to assume that God supports any particular faction in these contests, any more than we jokingly suggest in sporting competitions (“Of course God is a Penn State fan! Why else is the sky blue and white?”) Nor, of necessity, is the other side doing the Devil’s work.

Such a view is pernicious nonsense, all the more so if it leads believers to plunge wholeheartedly into the whole toxic and obsessive world of fervent partisan lies and contorted propaganda, on either side of the divide. Driven in large part by social media and shifting standards of media and news presentation, American electoral contests have become ideal vehicles for the institutionalization of hatred, dehumanization, paranoia, and mendacity.

At a personal level, I have witnessed the effects of current partisanship on people I used to think were rational and critical. I am not sure they are ever coming back to anything like normality as it once existed. Nor can I cite too many real-world cults that have had such a pernicious effect on the minds of their devotees. Incidentally, my comment here is totally non-partisan: I have seen people on both sides of the divide vanish into their respective rabbit holes.

The world remains the world, and the more you invest in it and its delusions, the worse for all of us. Maybe that text about “My kingdom is not of this world” really means it, and if we forget that, we are making the greatest mistake of all. Why do we always act as if the contrary is true?

Well, that gets into theological issues that might be too weighty to argue through right now, but let me make some more practical (and secular) suggestions for understanding and reconciliation.

Half a Country

If your candidate won, then celebrate by all means, and enjoy victory. But maybe minimize the crowing or gloating, don’t claim a moment of national salvation or resurrection, and above all, don’t show contempt for the other side. The one thing I can say with near certainty is that if your person won, then around half the country disagrees with you and them, I mean really disagrees, very seriously. They are in pain right now. They think the country is on a direct path to Hell, and I don’t just mean that in a spiritual sense. They have a sense of apocalyptic doom.

More to the point, those people are not going away. Nor are they going to change their opinions because they are constantly attacked and mocked. They are going to hold those views more strongly and passionately. You know the bumper sticker “The floggings will continue until morale improves”? You know that is meant to be a joke, right?

The odds are that you don’t personally know anyone who holds an opposite view about the relative virtues of Smith and Jones, and that kind of separation in itself is a horrific statement about any society, and its chance for survival as a democracy. But assume you do know someone. How about offering some sympathy, some compassion? Not to mention some practical advice, grounded in history.

A Country Is Far More Than Its Presidents

Try saying something like this. So your candidate Jones lost and you hate that, I understand that, and personally, I am glad they did lose. But remember how the US system works. We elect a President, not a dictator. Presidents may want to do all sorts of things, but they are really limited in what they actually can do. We have a Congress, and courts, and both are still operational. So is the extensive bureaucracy that implements policies.

That really is a critical point that often gets missed, and I blame historians for perpetuating the error. When we describe US history, we always do it in terms of Presidents and their elections, because they seem to mark such critical dividing points. We think of the Reagan era or the Obama years. But how much do such individuals actually matter in shaping the country and its history in terms of what actually affects people’s lives? Nothing like as much as we pretend. I’ll come back to this point.

What Goes Around…

More important, even very strong presidents are highly constrained by Constitutional realities. Do realize that in two years, TWO, not four, there will likely be a massive sea change in politics, which will almost certainly benefit your side. Pretty much always, there is a mid-term reaction against the established order as symbolized by the new president, and that will be reflected in Congressional and Senate elections. Focus on 2026.

Do you hate the newly-elected President Smith for what that person believes and promises? Well, don’t worry too much. In two years time, their power to do much will be massively constrained.

The Greatest Country In The World, Seriously

It also pays to recall that the country that just made this presidential decision is not going away, not going to change fundamentally, even if particular elections don’t work the way you want. But you really can’t go anywhere else. Somehow, however they voted, the two very different halves of the country have to find ways of living together, no option.

SPOILER ALERT: I am about to say something that sounds like I am venturing into sentimental cliché. But it does bear directly on my point about just how much particular presidential elections do (or don’t) matter.

I can give you a list right now of things that, in my view, are deeply wrong and troubling about the US, and the directions it is taking. But maybe, with all its problems, this really is the best country in the world to live, in terms of its prosperity, safety, and freedoms. And changes elsewhere in the world make it even more so as time goes on. If you want to argue with that contention, feel free to offer alternative suggestions as to other candidates for model countries, and I can tell you why they don’t work.

Do particularly let me know if you can think of a country that lacks a heritage of violence, conquest, land theft, and systematic injustice, a society that has always been marked by justice, peace, and equality. Good luck on that one. To be more specific, do point me to societies that for lengthy periods of their history did not institutionalize slavery, or some functional equivalent of that system, or did not practice systematic racial/ethnic oppression. The main difference with the United States is the degree to which this country has worked to come to terms with its past.

You can fantasize about moving to some other country where they do things better, but you can’t really do such a thing. Where would you go? When people mention moving to Country X, they are usually going on a stereotype of that country that is probably a decade or two out of date, and those people are not talking to current residents of that country, who are deeply disenchanted with it and probably want to move to the USA anyway.

So you are going to move to England for its socialized medical system and its Labour government? Or to Russia because they don’t have gay marriage? Really? And you still think there is such a thing as Scandinavian social democracy? Don’t get me started on Canada…

To quote the ancient scripture, “There is no more New Frontier/we have got to make it here.”

Presidents Come and Presidents Go…

But could even a dreadful new president ruin the “greatest country”? Think about the country’s astonishing fundamental strengths, and more specifically, look at the mind-boggling US-driven and -dominated technological and economic transformation of the past three decades. I quote a recent Economist:

Over the past three decades America has left the rest of the rich world in the dust. In 1990 it accounted for about two-fifths of the GDP of the G7. Today it makes up half. Output per person is now about 30% higher than in western Europe and Canada, and 60% higher than in Japan—gaps that have roughly doubled since 1990. Mississippi may be America’s poorest state, but its hard-working residents earn, on average, more than Brits, Canadians or Germans.

Do read that last sentence carefully. Have you wondered why the USA is the unerring magnet for attracting ambitious and enterprising people from all corners of the world?

You may remember China, which was allegedly on its way to overtaking the US as the world’s largest economy? It is facing a monumental series of crises, financial, industrial and above all, demographic. Its nominal GDP was 75 percent of the US figure in 2021, but 66 percent today. Maybe, to adapt a saying once applied in another context, China is the country of the future, and it always will be.

And before you say that material prosperity is not all that matters, you are exactly right. But poor countries stand no chance whatever of dealing with the world’s problems, of creating justice and spreading prosperity. Climate issues alone are going to be very, very, expensive.

More to the point, that spectacular three decades or so – the American period since 1990 – involved administrations by some presidents that you loved and some you loathed. We are dealing with Bush I, Clinton, Bush II, Obama, Trump, and Biden. That is a scarily diverse bunch of individuals and policies. But those individual realities interfered not at all with that overall trajectory, with that spectacular period of growth and development. The social, cultural, and technological revolution launched by smartphones and social media began under Clinton and Bush II, and soared under Obama. Technically, the utterly revolutionary innovation of the iPhone arrived under Bush II, in 2007, but no sane person would describe it as a product of the “Bush era,” of the “Age of W.”

To ask that seditious question once more, how much do presidents actually matter? So what makes you think the incoming President Smith is going to make any greater impact, for good or ill?

Doing Unto Others

Anyway, if my own Jones candidate actually does lose, that is the kind of message that I would like to hear. It would really encourage me to reconcile to the other side. If the candidate I prefer does win, then may I apply these lessons when dealing with others.

Philip Jenkins

elections

presidencies

Previous Post

November 6, 2024

Lord, Give Us A King to Lead Us

Next Post

November 9, 2024 What Is the Anxious Bench: A Note from Our Editor

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I love horror but would have to acclimate back to Lovecraft and especially Machen. Have ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"Very good point about MacDonald.I am certainly a Machen fan!"

philipjenkins

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"The Scottish author George MacDonald integrated fairy world into his fiction in a way that ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"I like the idea that we can have different streams. The coffee analogy is genius."

Lisa Clark Diller

How Do You Take Your Evangelicalism?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Rabboni" mean, as Mary Magdalene called Jesus after the resurrection?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Savior Messenger Shepherd Teacher