Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
The problem with JD Vance

The problem with JD Vance

Last updated on: October 1, 2024 at 2:21 am by Erica Ramirez

0 Comments

The problem with JD Vance 2024-10-01T02:21:09-04:00 Erica Ramirez

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Tomorrow night, Tim Walz will debate JD Vance, fresh off his Saturday appearance in Pennsylvania. Vance took the stage at what the NY Times called “a Town Hall ‘hosted by The Lance Wallnau Show Courage Series.'” Lance Wallnau is an evangelical prosperity preacher from Dallas and a high profile leader in the New Apostolic Reformation (NAR). Participants in the NAR hold “the belief that Christians should influence or even rule society, from politics to media to culture and the economy.” The movement is considered a very strident strain of Christian Nationalism. When I read about Vance’s appearance at a Wallnau event, I thought it seemed odd–but seeming odd appears to be par for Vance’s course.

Recent polling suggests that Walz enjoys stronger support across the midwest. According to the NY Times, polls found: “Mr. Walz was viewed favorably by 44 percent of likely voters in Ohio, Michigan and Wisconsin and unfavorably by 41 percent. Mr. Vance was viewed favorably by 42 percent of likely voters in those states and unfavorably by 48 percent, the polls found. Both men were chosen in part to appeal to voters in the Midwest.” Even in Vance’s home state of Ohio, 45 percent of likely voters had a favorable view of Mr. Vance, while 47 percent had an unfavorable one. Ouch.

There are likely many reasons midwesterners are cool toward Vance. But as I have watched him struggle to make a case for himself and the Trump ticket, I have come to suspect that Vance is caught in something of a conundrum with evangelical Republican voters. One the one hand, Vance provides important intellectual heft that the ticket needs in a candidate but on the other, he also embodies things they really don’t like.

On What They Need. It’s shorthand to say that Donald Trump overturned Roe v. Wade. In 2015-16 Donald Trump campaigned on overturning Roe but what that meant was Trump committed to appointing conservative judges to the Supreme Court every chance he got. (There is a fascinating podcast on this topic, concerning Trump’s pact with Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of the anti-abortion Susan B. Anthony List, by The Daily.) While media coverage of the overturning of Roe focused on Trump’s role in appointments, less noted was the increasing Catholicity of the Supreme Court bench. But to establish the conservative supermajority that Trump delivered for his constituents, Trump appointed not one but three Catholic jurists to the bench. (Gorsuch is sometimes credited with being Protestant but hails from Catholic circles).

“Why haven’t there been any evangelicals on the Supreme Court?” asked a March 2022 article in Christianity Today. The article notes the historical dominance of Catholics on the bench and includes a quote from The New Republic, from 2005, which asserted (by way of an answer) that: “Evangelicals didn’t just need Catholic bodies; they needed Catholic minds to supply them with rhetoric that relied more heavily on morality than biblical quotation.” Commenting on 2005’s conservative bench, this New Republic article observed: “When George H.W. Bush appointed Thomas, it’s a good bet that his Catholicism wasn’t foremost on the president’s mind. But the emergence of the Court’s Catholic bloc reflects the reality of social conservatism: Evangelicals supply the political energy, Catholics the intellectual heft.”

If, as the media depicts, evangelicals are most responsible for putting Trump in office, the overturning of Roe required something more– well educated, decorated, legal scholar-Catholics. The end of Roe was an interfaith effort.

This story is writ a little smaller in the Trump-Vance ticket. Vance is better than Trump at giving voice to conservative politics. He’s better at communicating political concepts and promises than is Trump, who remains bombastic and simplistic in his speech– a big beautiful wall, monster immigrants, Haitians “eating dogs and cats”–Trump’s strength is not his turn of political phrasing. In his debate with Harris, candidate Trump stumbled and bloviated: his are the bigger crowds! Asked for an outline of a future policy, Trump suggested that he had “concepts of a plan.” Faced with the same questions about Trump’s policy plans, Vance pivoted quickly and effectively to Trump’s record of delivering a strong economy. Confronted by Dana Bash on the dog and cat-eating mishap, Vance held his rhetorical ground: his role was to amplify the concerns of his constituency, not repress such concerns–as does the media.

“Unlike a lot of candidates who get trained to deliver their talking points over and over and over again, [Vance] actually engages with a question and is able to have an ongoing dialog or battle,” says Henry Olsen, a senior fellow at the conservative thinktank Ethics and Public Policy Center, in the Guardian. The article asserts that Vance is “more Trump than Trump” and “an effective Maga messenger.”

If this is true, Trump has given the base something they need: a person able to thoughtfully act as apologist for the angst of Trump’s base– and someone young, with a long career potentially ahead of him.

On What They Want. While I do think Vance is better at rhetoric than Trump, I am not sure that he is the better Maga messenger. It’s no secret that in the month after the Republican National Convention, the shine really seemed to wear off Vance– Walz capitalized on this time by memorably asserting Vance to be weird.

While Vance is better spoken and more thoughtful than Trump, ultimately, I think these very strengths are a liability for Vance. His demeanor and address announce him as cerebral and even elite (Vance attended Yale Law). These are qualities that work against one in populist crowd like Trump’s, who prefer plain-speak and common sense.

I’ve written elsewhere about Trump’s style of humor– his cantankerous anti-elite diatribes against the likes of Dr. Fauci and Barack Obama (a Harvard Law grad). Trump’s populist humor appeals to the populist dna in evangelical culture. After he was shot in the ear in a failed assassination attempt, many commentators hoped Trump would emerge with a new tone (conciliatory, transcendent?) and a new message (unity). But instead, Trump offered:

” I was supposed to be nice. They say, something happened to me when I got shot–I became nice–.And when you’re dealing with these people, they’re really dangerous people, you really can’t be too nice. So, if you don’t mind,” Trump bellowed, “I am not going to be nice! Is that okay?’

The crowd roared with laughter.

Other people may have been looking for a chastened, more erudite Trump to emerge after being shot. But what Maga crowds wanted was their favorite comedian, performing his well worn schtick. For Trump to emerge fully recovered and in spiritual tact, he needed to get back to roasting someone.

Taking this cue, Trump went on to berate President Jimmy Carter for being the worst president ever–that is,right up until Biden. It’s this side of Trump, willing to model populist antagonism, to which Trump’s base (including evangelicals) clings.

In showing up to Wallnau’s Town Hall, Vance is signaling he’s willing to reach out to Trump’s most rowdy and activated base. In order to win the debate, he will attempt to use logic and persuasion. Vance will be composed and thoughtful in his answers. He will be tenacious for the ticket and Trump’s vision for America. But he doesn’t know good jokes work and when he tries to be funny, he’s often palpably awkward.

Tomorrow night, we will find out whether Trump’s base can evaluate substance separately from style.

American Religious History

Previous Post

September 26, 2024

The Faiths of #VastEarlyAmerica

Next Post

October 3, 2024 The River Empires of #VastEarlyAmerica

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I love horror but would have to acclimate back to Lovecraft and especially Machen. Have ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"Very good point about MacDonald.I am certainly a Machen fan!"

philipjenkins

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"The Scottish author George MacDonald integrated fairy world into his fiction in a way that ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"I like the idea that we can have different streams. The coffee analogy is genius."

Lisa Clark Diller

How Do You Take Your Evangelicalism?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who's sight was restored by Ananias in Damascus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Paul of Tarsus Pontius Pilate King Saul Saul of Tarsus