Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
History and Religion
The Evangelical Response to the Trump Verdict

The Evangelical Response to the Trump Verdict

Last updated on: June 3, 2024 at 9:09 am by Joey Cochran

0 Comments

The Evangelical Response to the Trump Verdict 2024-06-03T09:09:20-04:00 Joey Cochran

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Since the rule of law was upheld in the courts of New York on Thursday, May 30, 2024 and a jury of his peers convicted the forty-fifth President of the United States, Donald J. Trump, on 34 counts of felony—there have been numerous responses to the verdict from evangelicals. While these events have unfolded and as I’ve taken in the evangelical responses to them, I have been rereading and reflecting on the significance of James K. A. Smith’s book, You Are What You Love (Brazos Press, 2016), a book published months after Trump took office. Why? Smith’s book, You Are What You Love, has helped me understand the evangelical response to the Trump verdict.

Evangelical Responses to President Trump’s guilty verdict near Manhattan Criminal Court (AP Newsroom)

The premise of Smith’s book is that we are liturgical creatures of habit, whose desire and ultimate end is to love. What we love forms or de-forms us, depending upon the nature of that love. Smith argues that de-forming secular liturgies surround us that tell us a substitute and counterfeit story of love. One of those many liturgies has to do with consumption.

Smith says that this secular liturgy deceives us in many ways. The ideal advertising images of the good life make us think we can fix our broken lives if we just had the goods they advertise. This deceives people into an unending cycle of consuming goods and services that they think might save them and fix their problems. Yet, these goods become obsolete or out of fashion, forcing us to dispose them for new goods. And the conclusion of a service or experience requires us to seek another one even more exclusive or superior.

Possessing the tangible, finished product tricks us into forgetting the invisible processes of resource and labor exploitation that brought that good into being. While tailoring consumer decision making to our own tastes and preferences entails individualism, the experience of shopping involves others but often towards the end of comparison and competition. We compare and compete with one another for status designated by the goods we accumulate or the exclusive services we experience.

While the deceptive allure and corruptive power of consuming goods and services seem apparent to us, there is no escaping the fact that we are embedded in a capitalistic system that requires us to labor for resources that permit us to purchase goods and services, which ensure our survival. Our resource rich environment, while being rapidly depleted through industrialization, has made it possible for many, who have an abundance of disposable resources, to massively consume goods and services that cater to their values and worldview.

One of those value and worldview driven conglomerates of goods and services is Brand Evangelicals, which is undergirded by an entire industrial complex, coined by Skye Jethani as the Evangelical Industrial Complex. The existence of Brand Evangelicals and its industrial complex entails a convergence and blurring between the secular liturgy of consumption and the sacred Christian liturgy that Smith champions, for evangelicals have built a brand and industry out of the evangelical story.

The evangelical brand and industry is a sort of kingdom vision in and of itself. As Smith puts it, “To be human, we could say, is to desire the kingdom—some kingdom…we all live and long for a social vision of what we think society should look like too” (Smith, You Are What You Love, 11). The social vision of Brand Evangelicals looks like something. Whatever it is, it is desirable to them and signifies their vision of human flourishing and the good life.

James K. A. Smith, You Are What You Love (Brazos, 2016).

This is why the philosophical, theological, and cultural premises of Smith’s book undergird my research on Brand Evangelicals. If we are what we love, how we use our time and spend our resources objectively indicate what are our habit forming loves. Consumption of the evangelical brand is formative, just as Smith argues, and it produces reflexive responses to our world. Since reflexive responses to the world indicate what evangelicals value and love, then major events that dramatically affect the lives of evangelicals become valuable moments to get a pulse on what values are forming and fashioning the evangelical brand.

The felony conviction of Donald Trump is just one such moment that helps us put a finger on the pulse of the evangelical heart. And, if we take Smith’s argument seriously, that the heart is the control center of our being, then getting the pulse of the evangelical heart is of great consequence to us.

Mind you that Mark Noll’s emphasis on the Scandal of the Evangelical Mind may have inadvertently caused evangelicals to inordinately put too much stock in an intellectualist tradition, one to which evangelicals historically do not adhere. Part of the story of evangelicals is that they are heart religion people. The pietist and mystical impulses that emigrated from Continental Europe into the affections of early evangelicals played a crucial role in stimulating the transatlantic evangelical revival of the eighteenth century. Merely look to the intellectual father of evangelicals, Jonathan Edwards, and note that his pinnacle reflection on the revival consisted of an exploration on how an individual might perceive genuine religious affections within herself or himself (Religious Affections, WJE, Vol. 2).

All that said, if you’re an evangelical, you may wish to examine your embodied, emotional, and social response to the verdict of Donald Trump and consider what that means about what has discipled or catechized you. Your visceral and instinctual response to this news points to what you really long for and desire. You may also wish to look at signature evangelical leaders’ responses to the Trump verdict to compare notes and get a read on how attuned your heart is to those who sit at the heart of the evangelical movement.

Let’s take, for instance, the opinion editorial, “The Verdict Is In”, at World Magazine from Albert Mohler, President of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky. Mohler’s response to the verdict helps us get a pulse on the heart of evangelicals, and I aver that your response to his article also pinpoints much about what you think and feel about the evangelical brand.

Mohler argues that the verdict is “a major turning point in American history.” I am not surprised that he believes this, nor am I inclined to disagree with his perspective. But I’d like to qualify this by noting that historians normally require more time to pass, in order to create critical distance from an event, which makes it possible to distinguish the importance of one event from any other rival turning point. After all, it is tempting for people to hyperbolize and sensationalize moments in history with the turning point construct.

Essential to a turning point is an irreversible outcome that forever changes the course of the subject you are studying. Once again, failing to permit substantial time to pass, after an event, may lead to falsely calling a reversible event a turning point. For instance, it now would be embarrassing to call Al Mohler’s tweet “Never. Ever. Period” a turning point for him.

Never. Ever. Period.

— Albert Mohler (@albertmohler) May 4, 2016

Nonetheless, Mohler’s assertion that this is a turning point in American history checks out when we consider his theological and cultural commitments, the argument of his opinion editorial, and the nature of the turning points construct. Here’s why. Turning point histories have predominantly been male biased.

The medievalist, Caroline Walker Bynum, remarks, “Women tended to tell stories and develop personal models without crises or turning points” (Bynum, Holy Feast and Holy Fast, 25). Mark Noll’s Introduction to the third edition of his Turning Points book admits to the traditionally male bias of turning point histories. “That it is mostly men who figure as the principal actors in the turning points that follow is less a statement about the intrinsic character of the faith than it is a reflection of how the church’s public life has been documented through the centuries” (Noll, Turning Points, 10). The notion of turning points is the product of what Herbert Butterfield called Whig history, history centered on writing about great men by great admirers, who all happened to be white, male, and normally reformed protestants.

So then we should not be astonished when Mohler centers the toxically masculine Trump as a victim of a “show trial”, elevates Trump’s discretion that “he doesn’t confuse male and female”, downplays the abusive and destructive behavior of Trump’s sexual scandals, and calls it all a “major turning point in American history.” For Brand Evangelicals like Al Mohler, there is no turning back. Protecting and preserving the American value of patriarchy is more critical than prosecuting predators. Mohler prefers to belittle the rule of law and our judicial system than give ground on evangelical political and cultural power.

Is this Trump verdict the evangelical Scopes trial of the twenty-first century and a turning point in the history of Christianity in the United States? We shall see. From Mohler’s perspective, it is.

Elesha Coffman recently published her own Turning Points in American Church History (Baker Academic, 2024). In her Introduction she writes:

Like any author, I have opinions about the topics I write on. My opinions inform my perspective, as does my demographic identity. I can write only as the person I am: a white, English-speaking, American Protestant woman, born in what is often called “the year of the evangelicals.” But perspective differs from partisanship. (Coffman, Turning Points in American Church History, 6, emphasis added)

I’d like to think that Mohler’s perspective, and that of World Magazines, is unencumbered by partisan loyalties. However, my gut says that the typical evangelical response to the Trump verdict is driven by partisan loyalties rather than a kingdom ethic of love.

If you wish for a fair and thoughtful reporting on the landscape of the evangelical response to the Trump verdict, I commend to you the excellent reporting from Harvest Prude at Christianity Today, “Guilty Verdict Shakes Trump Supporters Faith—in the Justice System.”

Joey Cochran (Ph.D., Trinity Evangelical Divinity School) is the General Editor of the Anxious Bench and the Social Media Coordinator for the Conference on Faith and History. He has taught at Wheaton College, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, and Trinity Christian College. Cochran is the author of the forthcoming book from Brazos Press, Brand Evangelicals*.*

History and Religion

You Are What You Love

Previous Post

May 31, 2024

Reckoning with the Cost of Free Land

Next Post

June 3, 2024 Hallowed Be Thy Name: Your President Is Not Jesus

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I love horror but would have to acclimate back to Lovecraft and especially Machen. Have ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"Very good point about MacDonald.I am certainly a Machen fan!"

philipjenkins

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"The Scottish author George MacDonald integrated fairy world into his fiction in a way that ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"I like the idea that we can have different streams. The coffee analogy is genius."

Lisa Clark Diller

How Do You Take Your Evangelicalism?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who betrayed Jesus for 30 pieces of silver?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Simon Peter Judas Iscariot John James