Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
Donald Trump’s Conviction and Historical Turning Points

Donald Trump’s Conviction and Historical Turning Points

Last updated on: June 10, 2024 at 2:00 am by Paul Thompson

0 Comments

Donald Trump’s Conviction and Historical Turning Points 2024-06-10T01:59:09-04:00 Paul Thompson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Donald Trump’s May 30th conviction by a jury of his peers on 34 felony counts inspired countless pundits to declare that America had entered a “new era.” For example, a Wall Street Journal editorial called the verdict the beginning of a “new and destabilizing era,” and Al Mohler called it “a major turning point in American history.” Even the response to the verdict has been declared a turning point. Ronald Brownstein in The Atlantic claimed that Republicans’ denunciation of the verdict ushered America into a “dangerous new era.” (It’s like we entered one era on Thursday and another one by Friday. Boy that first era was short!) Well . . . everyone . . . welcome to a “new era” in American history! We are almost two weeks in. Are you feeling it yet?

Such hyperbole triggers the historian in me to reflexively respond with many questions. Here is a sampling: What makes Trump’s conviction a “turning point” or a “new era” in American history? Is it really a “new era?” How would we know? What makes the events of May 30, 2024 any more of a “turning point” than a whole list of other events that have occurred since Trump announced his presidential candidacy on June 16, 2015? But more on this in a moment. Let me first offer a mini history lesson.

One of the timeworn tasks of historians is to identify turning points in history, or to define historical time periods, aka periodization. The historians who most enjoy this exercise tend to believe that we need some distance in time between us and the matter being studied so that we can acquire a degree of objectivity and begin to perceive some cause and effect over time. Most historians would consider it an act of hubris (or journalism) to declare that an event that occurred literally yesterday is a “historical turning point.” Historians are not prophets. Unlike historians, however, pundits and opinion columnists tend to be rewarded for prophetic utterances.

The act of periodization falls under one of the so-called “five C’s” of history, namely, change over time. It is so foundational to our profession that in graduate school I once earned a B+ on a research paper primarily because I failed to demonstrate change over time. The scholarship of every field of history employs widely recognized turning points, but occasionally historians argue for a different periodization scheme than the commonly accepted one, and I have always enjoyed reading alternative periodization models.

In western civilization, the most basic periodization scheme is ancient/medieval/modern. In U.S. history, it is common to create two-part U.S. history survey courses and two-part African American history survey courses. Many schools end the first half of each course with the end of the Civil War (1865), but some end it with the Compromise of 1877 which ended the era of Reconstruction. In my own area of research, 19th century temperance, Jack S. Blocker Jr.’s American Temperance Movements book offered the most common periodization model, but I have suggested another one that conflates two of his time periods into one.

When I was a student during the 20th century, I was told by one of my history professors that as far as historians are concerned, “history” ended about 40 years ago, and everything since then is “current events.” The rise of bullet point communication, the internet, social media, and instantaneous worldwide news has substantially altered communication since the 1980s, so now in this century, the Anxious Bench blog on which this post is appearing, is only one of many 21st century venues (blogs, podcasts, substacks, etc.) where historians are systematically ignoring this tradition in order to join conversations about current events using their historical lens. So this is my take on Donald Trump and historical turning points. (For full disclosure, 2004 was the last time I voted in a presidential general election.)

Donald Trump has built his presidential campaigns and presidency by brazenly crossing unwritten lines, and then boldly inhabiting previously uninhabited legal, procedural, constitutional, and rhetorical spaces. Period. That is “the Donald’s” political playbook. It is a difference in kind, not degree, from previous presidents and presidential candidates. (See here for an example of how he is different in kind from his predecessors.)

Some of these are practices with judicially unexplored ramifications (pardoning himself), some are potentially treasonous (alternate elector scheme and attempts to overthrow 2020 election by fiat), and some undermine longtime practices that evolved to build confidence in the integrity of the person and the office of the presidency (his refusal to release his tax returns and how he relates to foreign leaders). And Trump is promising to continue this trend in constitutionally threatening ways if re-elected by trying to directly control spending himself. With the exception of Congress, other institutions, such as the media and the judicial system, have been slow to adapt to Trump’s re-conceptualization of the presidency.

However, in the case of Trump’s New York civil and criminal trials, we have witnessed what can happen when the judicial system creatively adapts itself to Trump. New York City and state law enforcement have become as baldly political as Trump has been crassly disrespectful of presidential traditions and the office itself. He is unaccustomed to the judiciary stepping into the same legal, procedural, constitutional, and rhetorical gray zones he inhabits*,* and so they have collided. He is upset that they are merely doing what he has been doing for years.

These collisions (the felony convictions and his unfavorable civil verdict) seem to be merely two more stops on the train ride to a “new era” in American history we are all experiencing. Turning points between eras are often more akin to “local” subways with many stops, than to express trains. Our nation has been on something akin to the “8th Avenue local” (a NYC subway) since at least June 2015. Below I identify some of the many “local stops” we’ve experienced along the way that any prescient observer could have dubbed the dawn of a “new and destabilizing era,” or a major “turning point.”

Arguably the first stop was how The Apprentice reality TV show created a misleading image and overwhelming nationwide name recognition for Trump. (here and here) (New Yorkers, of course, already possessed an image of Trump independent of his reality TV show, and have twice overwhelmingly rejected him for president.)

Perhaps the next stop was when voters decided they could excuse a presidential candidate who said as part of his candidacy announcement that Mexico was “sending people who have lots of problems. . . they are bringing drugs . . . they are rapists.” (Black people also have been called “black beast rapists.”)

Another stop was when voters decided they could excuse Trump’s practice of encouraging individual violence from the podium during his rallies. Surely this heralded a “new and destabilizing era” in American history!

Then there were the many many stops in the white evangelical community, as millions of “evangelical voters,” one by one, rationalized how they could vote for Trump despite his disturbing character issues. A month after declaring his candidacy, during the Family Leadership Summit, Trump doubled down on his comments about Mexicans. Then, when asked if he ever asked God for forgiveness, said: “I am not sure I have. I just go on and try to do a better job from there. I don’t think so,” he said. “I think if I do something wrong, I think, I just try and make it right. I don’t bring God into that picture. I don’t.” (here and here) Months later he doubled down on that answer. The fact that masses of “evangelical voters” did not flee his candidacy like the plague after such bone chilling hubris from a presidential wanna be, surely merits the moniker “major historical turning point.”

Another stop in the evangelical community on the way to May 30 was when evangelical voters en masse decided that the Bible verses and practical theology contained in such documents as the 1998 Southern Baptist “Resolution of Moral Character of Public Officials” and in James Dobson’s September letter of that same year to his supporters regarding the Clinton-Lewinsky scandal should only apply to Democratic presidential candidates. (This matter resurfaced again just last week on Anderson Cooper.) John Piper parsed the theological legerdemain practiced by millions of evangelical voters as only he could, when he said he was

“baffled that so many Christians consider the sins of unrepentant sexual immorality (porneia), unrepentant boastfulness (alazoneia), unrepentant vulgarity (aischrologia), unrepentant factiousness (dichostasiai), and the like, to be only toxic for our nation, while policies that endorse baby-killing, sex-switching, freedom-limiting, and socialistic overreach are viewed as deadly.

The reason I put those Greek words in parentheses is to give a graphic reminder that these are sins mentioned in the New Testament. To be more specific, they are sins that destroy people. They are not just deadly. They are deadly forever.”

These historic “turning points” among evangelicals were so disturbing that they generated a wave of scholarship exploring the “crisis” of the evangelical world, as Thomas Kidd put it in his book.

Then there was Kellyanne Conway’s infamous “alternative facts” statement that artfully employed postmodern thinking to burnish Trump’s image in response to the obviously low attendance at his inauguration. Surely that was some kind of “new era!”

Trump was the first president to be impeached twice.

There have been so many local stops!

Then there was Trump’s December 19, 2020 “Be there. Will be wild!” tweet encouraging followers to attend a protest in D.C. on January 6. Never before had a president called for a protest in D.C. after being told by his attorney general and others that he had lost the election. Why not call that a new era?

Of course there were the events of January 6, 2021 itself, where so called “patriotic” Americans rioted and invaded the capitol for the express purpose of interrupting a constitutional proceeding of Congress. Police officers who tried to stop the rioters were injured, and are now disdained by many Republican lawmakers. Lawmakers and Trump initially criticized the rioters, but then did a 180 and now call them persecuted patriots. (This paragraph would have been nonsensical and unbelievable if written any time in our history before the 2020 presidential election.)

The list of stops goes on and on. You get the idea.

Trump’s conviction was many things, and it might have been a “major” turning point, but I doubt it. (Time will tell.) Using another metaphor, I suspect it was just another mile marker on a miles-long exit ramp from our Founding Fathers’ vision for responsible and moral self-government at the federal level.

Americans have always said our president is not above the law, so now our legal system has the opportunity to demonstrate that this is in fact the case, and not merely a canard. But it is likely that the only way our legal system can actually hold Trump accountable for some of his behaviors is for it to move into and in ambiguous spaces like Trump does. Yes, Trump’s presidential-related actions are also changing related American governing institutions, and he wants to be reelected so he can do more of that. (see Project 2025)

But all of these changes can only occur because so many earlier “turning points” had already occurred in the hearts and minds of so many voters in a few swing states. In light of such a long list of unprecedented events associated with Trump’s candidacy and presidency, his conviction alone (nor the Republican response to it) should not be seen as a unique marker of a “new and destabilizing day” in American history. Almost any well informed person could have predicted the events of May 30th.

Politics and Religion

Donald Trump

Evangelicalism

Historical Thinking

Southern Baptist Convention

Southern Baptist Convention

voters

Previous Post

June 7, 2024

Memory Loss, Identity, and Whether History Matters

Next Post

June 11, 2024 The Danger of Silence About Gaza

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I love horror but would have to acclimate back to Lovecraft and especially Machen. Have ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"Very good point about MacDonald.I am certainly a Machen fan!"

philipjenkins

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"The Scottish author George MacDonald integrated fairy world into his fiction in a way that ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"I like the idea that we can have different streams. The coffee analogy is genius."

Lisa Clark Diller

How Do You Take Your Evangelicalism?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called ____ of God.

Select your answer to see how you score.

Servants Friends Children Disciples