Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
History and Religion
Adams, MacArthur and Evangelical Denial of Mental Illness

Adams, MacArthur and Evangelical Denial of Mental Illness

Last updated on: June 21, 2024 at 5:46 pm by Guest Contributor

0 Comments

Adams, MacArthur and Evangelical Denial of Mental Illness 2024-06-21T17:46:16-04:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

On the eve of mental health awareness month, a clip of John MacArthur made its way around the website formerly known as Twitter. In it, the pastor of Grace Community Church in Southern California denied the existence of such mental disorders as PTSD, OCD, or ADHD. He claimed that these diagnoses were simply “noble lies” that Big Pharma used to give psychologists license to medicate people, stating that mental illness was, in reality, the result of an inability to cope with life and to take responsibility for one’s actions. This is but one recent instance in a longer history of evangelical denial of mental illness.

Evangelical Denial of Mental Illness

For those familiar with MacArthur, the ideas expressed in this clip were neither new nor surprising. But as someone whose research examines the history of evangelical attitudes toward mental health and modern psychology, I find MacArthur’s comments remarkably reminiscent of an earlier strand of opposition to modern psychology that has flourished in some evangelical circles since the 1960s. It is these older arguments that MacArthur recycles, even as broad swaths of the evangelical world see no contradiction between a life of faith and the science of the mind.

For centuries before the advent of modern psychology, many Christians considered care for the “soul,” long thought to encompass the mind and emotions, to be among the most vital responsibilities of the church. As the psychologist replaced the pastor’s authority on the mind in American society, conservative white Protestants in the twentieth century developed an ambiguous relationship with the new science. By midcentury, many evangelicals sought to reverse the perceived cultural separatism of their fundamentalist forebearers, engaging readily with academic disciplines like psychology. Evangelical psychologists simultaneously worked to demonstrate that psychotherapy and theology could indeed coexist—that, as they often put it, all truth was God’s truth (even when that truth was ascertained through academic research). These evangelicals founded professional organizations like the Christian Association for Psychological Study (1956), academic journals, and accredited doctoral programs at such institutions as Fuller Theological Seminary (1965) and Biola University (1968) to train evangelical psychologists to meet the mental health needs of the church. These efforts were, by and large, successful in bringing the insights of modern psychology into the evangelical mainstream.

But while these efforts helped to equip Christian psychologists and pastors to offer aid to those suffering, their efforts prompted backlash among other evangelicals. The most well-known example was that of Jay Adams, Presbyterian pastor and father of what became known from the late 1960s onward as the “biblical counseling movement.” Under Adams, this movement was initially premised on several assumptions.

First, that human beings consisted of body and soul, exclusively; what psychologists and others conceived of as the “mind” fell under the broader category of soul. This resulted in a dualistic anthropology that collapsed mind, soul, and spirit into a single, immaterial category. Whereas Christian psychologists wrestled with the complex relationship between body, mind, and spirit, believing that these facets of the human being were inextricably, if mysteriously, connected, Adams believed that human beings consisted only of body and soul and, furthermore, that these two categories existed in isolation from one another.

That “mental illness” occurred not within the mind but within the soul meant, in Adams’ estimation, that psychological issues were, at root, spiritual issues. This line of thinking transformed mental illness into moral illness. Even before founding the biblical counseling movement, Adams had become convinced that psychotherapy merely functioned to absolve the guilty by casting wrongdoing as mental or emotional illness. In recalling his early attempts at pastoral counseling before adopting a “biblical counseling” approach, Adams’ wrote: “I found myself asking, ‘Is much of what is called mental illness, illness at all?’” (Adams, Competent to Counsel, xi). This pastor became increasingly convinced that most instances of mental illness stemmed from hidden sin. Addressing readers in 1970, he offered the example of persistent drunkenness, claiming that what the Bible labeled as a “sin” most mental health literature called a “disease.” Adams went on to theorize that other psychological diagnoses, such as depression, more often than not were the result of compounded guilt for unrepentant sins. (Given that Adams saw it as the pastor’s role to confront the sins of those who came to him, he often referred to his approach as nouthetic counseling, from the Greek word meaning “to admonish.”) He illustrated for readers the effects of this guilt with the graphic below:

Jay Adams, “Depression – Guilt” in Competent to Counsel (Zondervan, 1970, 2009), 126.

Adams set forth these views in, Competent to Counsel (Zondervan, 1970), the book which has perhaps become his most influential publication. Competent to Counsel advanced a twofold thesis: 1) that knowledge of Christian Scripture made ministers (and even Christian laypeople) entirely competent to counsel the faithful through any kind of intra- or interpersonal disturbance, and 2) that most problems that therapists labeled “psychological,” were, in fact, the result of sin. This stance stemmed, in part, from Adams’ counseling experiences in his early years as a minister; he recalled frequent feelings of incompetence when faced with counseling church members, who he perceived to be in need of professional psychological help. Increasingly, Adams grew frustrated with his lack of an alternative to secular psychological offerings. Concerning counseling, he interpreted the growing prominence of psychologists in American society as a threat to the authority of both the pastor and the Bible. Adams’ answer to this conundrum resulted in the publication of Competent to Counsel, which ignited the biblical counseling movement.

Another undergirding principle of Adams’ biblical counseling included his belief that Scripture must be the foundation of any knowledge system; any other epistemic foundation was fundamentally flawed. Adams interpreted and employed the arguments of theologian, Cornelius Van Til, as justification for his stance, writing that, “at bottom, all non-Christian systems demand autonomy for man, thereby seeking to dethrone God” (Adams, Competent to Counsel, xxi, fn. 1). For Adams, this epistemological position further undergirded his argument that pastors alone bore the credentials to offer guidance to suffering Christians. “Rather than defer and refer to psychiatrists steeped in their humanistic dogma,” he wrote, “ministers of the gospel and other Christian workers who have been called by God to help his people out of their distress, will be encouraged to reassume their privilege and responsibilities” (Adams, Competent to Counsel, 16).

This brought Adams into conflict with Christians who made a vocation out of the integration of theology and psychology, even as he demonstrated a failure (or unwillingness) to meaningfully engage with the viewpoints of those he criticized. He expressed staunch opposition to opponents, not only in print but in person, too. After giving a guest lecture at Biola’s Rosemead Graduate School of Psychology in the 1970s, Adams declared to students and faculty, “This program has no reason for existence, not only can you not integrate pagan thought and biblical teaching, but what you are trying to do is to train people to attempt the work of the church without ordination, outside the church. That is distorting God’s order of things” (Adams, More Than Redemption, 276). The address was, predictably, poorly received among his audience of professional counselors, who considered themselves part of the church, and, therefore, carrying out the work of the church, within the setting of a counseling clinic. What these faculty and students saw as a ministry of healing, Adams attacked as the employment of pagan principles that served only to dethrone God.

What began with Adams’ fast-selling book on biblical counseling turned into a full-fledged movement by the close of the 1970s. However, large swaths of the biblical counseling movement have undertaken a marked departure from Adams’s ideas and tone in recent decades. The largest biblical counseling organizations have softened their rhetoric, eschewing Jay Adams’ combativeness for a message decidedly less confrontational. It is now common to find biblical counselors, who affirm the connectedness of body, mind, and soul, as well as the reality of mental illnesses. More biblical counselsors quietly have become open to the use of some scientific research and psychotropic medications, while foregrounding care for the suffering, rather than rejecting psychology in their writings and practices. Still, Adams’ shadow looms large in many corners of this movement.

In many ways, MacArthur’s stance and rhetoric bear remarkable similarities to those of his pastoral counseling predecessor. Similar to Adams, MacArthur has long espoused the belief that the human soul encompasses the mind, and that counsel for the human soul is exclusively the purview of the pastor. But what’s more, he has carried on Adams’ penchant for oversimplification—and outright misrepresentation—of theories, individuals, and entire disciplines, since the 1980s. As far back as 1989, MacArthur warned in sermons that “insidious” psychology had infiltrated the church and country. Messages like this, for the last several decades, not only have failed to offer an accurate depiction of psychological treatment, but also have played consistently upon base human fears.

The aforementioned clip and an ensuing follow-up essay are no exception to this pattern. In the clip, MacArthur constructs a treacherously slippery slope from medication to drug-addicted homelessness, redirecting the anxieties of his listeners from public issues to psychiatry. Reading MacArthur’s follow-up piece, one might get the idea that all psychiatrists (and psychologists as well) readily prescribe addictive medication to the detriment of the individual and society, as they claim that these medications bear a 100% chance of alleviating every symptom of which a patient complains.

Like Adams, MacArthur also has refused to listen and meaningfully engage with brothers and sisters in the church, whose work, research, and experiences run counter to his claims. Indeed, for decades Christian mental health professionals have demonstrated that a life of faith (and often an evangelical faith, at that) need in no way be incompatible with modern psychology. And, unlike the 1960s, one can’t chalk up a dearth of engagement with these voices to an ignorance of their existence or to the inaccessibility of their work. There are now countless examples of faithful Christians, writing about the integration of Christianity and psychology for laity, academic audiences, and everyone in between; one cannot in good faith claim that this information is unavailable or that these voices are, in the words of MacArthur, “attacking biblical sanctification.”

Yet, this dearth of engagement, with qualified interlocutors, fails to take seriously the experiences of fellow believers, who testify to the help and healing mental health treatment has provided, which in no way is at odds with a vibrant life of faith. Tragically, this posture has had serious repercussions, beyond burning bridges with fellow Christians committed to alleviate the mental suffering of many.

In the worst of cases, this has manifested in tragic cases of abuse, including at MacArthur’s own Grace Community Church. Serious allegations have been made concerning instances of physical, sexual, and emotional abuse, which were not reported to authorities. Furthermore, those affected were not referred to mental health professionals. Rather, these instances were treated as the result of a departure from Scriptural teaching. In insulating congregants from the supposed danger of professional mental health services, the church also insulated sufferers of abuse from safety, justice, and legal recourse.

So, to be clear, what is troubling here is not the conviction that insights from Christian scripture or Christian belief could help ease mental and emotional suffering. As a Christian myself, I’ve anecdotally found this to be the case, but scientific research also testifies, in its own way, to the psychological benefits of religious belief, practice, and community, much of which finds its foundation in Scripture. No, what’s troubling about the recent discourse is the refusal to listen or meaningfully engage with brothers and sisters in the Church—whose work, research, and experiences run counter to MacArthur’s claims—and the insistence in doubling down on such stances, even when the fruit of those stances has proven to be so harmful to many. What’s troubling is that these statements obscure, for many listeners, the heart of a God who sees the suffering, hears their cries, and draws near to the brokenhearted.

Skylar Ray (Ph.D., Baylor University), Assistant Professor of History at John Brown University

Skylar Ray (Ph.D., Baylor University) is Assistant Professor of History at John Brown University. She is a specialist in religious and cultural history of twentieth-century United States. Her dissertation—“Healing Minds, Saving Souls: Evangelicals and Mental Health in the Age of the Therapeutic”—examined the evangelical relationship to modern psychology and its therapeutic function in treating issues of mental health.

History and Religion

Health, Fitness and Religion

Previous Post

June 20, 2024

Sea Peoples, Goths, and Barbarians

Next Post

June 24, 2024 No, the Humanity of Migrants Is Not a Joke

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I have an identical twin, and Thomas was always the disciple I connected with most. ..."

Terry

In the Footsteps of Thomas: A ..."

"I've never thought of Constantine as a villain. Do Christians generally? Maybe the ones who ..."

stevewe

Defending Constantine

"The TV sitcom BEWITCHED was an old favorite of mine"

philipjenkins

How Scotland Gave Us Our Modern ..."

"From now on whenever I see a clipper ship, see a certain brand of Scottish ..."

Terry

How Scotland Gave Us Our Modern ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims Piracy pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public Executions Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Hebrews teaches that the blood of bulls and goats can take away sins.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE