Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Politics and Religion
A “Just Peace” for Both Israel and the Palestinians

A “Just Peace” for Both Israel and the Palestinians

Last updated on: May 28, 2024 at 2:00 am by Daniel K. Williams

0 Comments

A “Just Peace” for Both Israel and the Palestinians 2024-05-27T14:53:44-04:00 Daniel K. Williams

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Christians didn’t have to wait until the latest round of campus protests against Israel to know that discussions about Israel and Palestine can inspire passionate moral debate about what justice really means in this case.

Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, US president Bill Clinton, and PLO leader Yasser Arafat at the Oslo Peace Accords, 1993 (Wikipedia / Executive Office of the United States)

A decade ago, the Presbyterian Church (USA) was sharply divided between partisans on both sides of a denominational debate about divestment that news reports described as “passionate.” In 2012, the denomination’s General Assembly voted by the narrowest of margins – 333 to 331 – to reject a motion to divest from companies that did a substantial amount of business with Israel. Two years later, the vote was almost as narrow – 310 to 303 – but the outcome was different: the PCUSA voted this time in favor of divesting from Israel. Immediately Jewish organizations that had been allied with the denomination denounced the move, and there were angry debates within the denomination as well. People wanted to know how a denomination that had once been such a strong supporter of Israel could begin treating it as an “apartheid state” – a phrase the denomination adopted in a 2022 resolution on Israel.

After the attacks of October 7, some in the Protestant world – especially the evangelical Protestant world – were quick to rally to Israel and to brook no criticism of any of its policies toward the Palestinians. Christians United for Israel, an evangelical organization founded by pastor John Hagee that now has 10 million members, pledged millions of dollars in support of Israel immediately after Hamas’s attack. And though Christianity Today has historically been more moderate and less overtly Zionist, it too responded to the beginning of the war with an editorial by Russell Moore encouraging Christians to “stand with Israel.”

Meanwhile, Churches for Middle East Peace (CMEP), of which the PCUSA is a member, called for a ceasefire within weeks of the beginning of the fighting. In February, the PCUSA’s mission agency warned that the United States was “complicit in the possible genocide of Palestinians in Gaza” because of its aid to Israel.

It might seem that Christians on either side of this debate are diametrically opposed in their thinking. One group wants justice for the Palestinians. In the view of their opponents, they have abandoned the concern for Israel that many American Protestants (both mainline and evangelical) had for much of the second half of the twentieth century.

The other side is adamant about being a blessing to Israel in accordance with the mandate of Genesis 12 and other scriptures. In the view of their critics, they have turned a deaf ear to the pleas of the Palestinians.

But perhaps there’s a way to find more common ground among the disputants than it might first appear. As I’ve reflected on the possibility for common ground over the past few weeks and months, I found inspiration in the insights of an evangelical Baptist ethicist who taught at Fuller Theological Seminary in the late twentieth century. The late Glen Stassen may not be a household name among American evangelicals, but his commitment to “just peacemaking” offers some needed wisdom for our current moment.

Just Peacemaking: The New Paradigm for the Ethics of Peace and War [Book]

Stassen, who was the son of Minnesota Republican governor Harold Stassen, was deeply committed to the path of peace, but as the son of a politician who was a presidential aspirant, he was no stranger to real-world political conflicts, and he was therefore no starry-eyed idealist. Making peace is difficult, he knew – but he was also convinced that it was possible. Over the course of several decades, he developed some practical steps for resolving longstanding conflicts with both justice and peace.

His first principle of just peacemaking was a commitment to mutual security for both parties in a conflict. Countries go to war with each other because they fear the other country is a threat to their security – so the key to creating a “just peace” between the two sides is to get both sides to affirm the security of the other. “The security of each adversary depends on the security of both adversaries,” David Gushee wrote in a summary of Stassen’s thinking. “There can be no security for either party unless both parties are confident that their reasonable interest in their own security is respected.”

A country that is truly interested in peace will take the first initiative to reach out to its enemy to discuss possibilities for peace, Stassen argued. And those initiatives will provide some sort of assurance of the others’ security, as well as an attempt to make amends for past wrongs rather than demonize the other.

So, what does this mean for the current conflict in Israel?

It means that the future security of Israel depends on guaranteed security for a Palestinian state. And the future security of a Palestinian state depends on the Palestinians’ guarantee of security for Israel.

If partisans on all sides of this conflict would affirm their commitment to the security of an Israeli Jewish state while talking about the rights of the Palestinians, and if they could affirm their commitment to justice for the Palestinians while talking about their support for Israel, both groups would discover some common ground.

To do that, it’s important to remember a bit of history from this region. It’s important to remember, for instance, that Jews have lived in Israel / Palestine continuously for thousands of years, and that the creation of the modern state of Israel had the imprimatur of a United Nations mandate in 1947, which was passed in the immediate aftermath (and in recognition of) the massive genocidal tragedy of the Holocaust. To pretend that the Jews have no right to have a state in Israel ignores a great deal of history. The principles of just peacemaking in this conflict require that we begin with a commitment to Israel’s right to exist – and, by extension, to a right to a peaceful, secure existence in which it is not threatened by organizations or states that want to annihilate it.

There are good reasons for Christians to support Israel and its right to exist. One is the issue of justice: Israel is a legitimate state whose rights must be upheld in the same way that any state’s rights to existence and security must be honored. But another reason is the special tie that Christians have to Israel and the Jewish people, both because of a shared history and because of a history of injustice. Christian Europe was guilty of centuries of anti-Semitic policies and actions. Even the United States, while not guilty of the pogroms that were part of some European countries’ policies toward the Jews, engaged in plenty of anti-Semitic actions. It was partly because of a shared sense of horror over the Holocaust and a realization that the world’s Jews needed a safe haven from the anti-Semitic horrors that the United States had done too little to oppose that the United States during the Truman administration was so quick to extend diplomatic recognition to the newly created state of Israel.

As a non-dispensationalist with a Reformed amillennial lens for interpreting scripture, I don’t believe that the Bible’s prophetic promises toward Israel pertain to the political state of Israel today – although I recognize that for millions of American evangelical Christians who hold a different interpretation of biblical prophecy, the Bible does provide a clear mandate for supporting the nation of Israel. But even without a dispensational reading of scripture or a belief in a modern fulfillment of the Bible’s land promises to Israel, I think that Romans 11 offers a clear mandate for a special permanent non-Jewish Christian respect for the Jewish people, since – as that passage of scripture points out – it is from Judaism that Christianity is descended. That certainly doesn’t mean that we should necessarily endorse everything that Israel does. But it does mean that Christianity has a special relationship to Judaism and a particular obligation to respect the Jewish people. Christians have an obligation to renounce whatever anti-Semitism has characterized Christianity in the past and to guard against its contemporary or future reappearance.

But at the same time, Christians also have good reasons to support the Palestinians. Arabs have lived in Palestine for at least 1,300 years, if not longer, and they, too, expect the right to self-determination and equality. Christians have an obligation to support Palestinian nationhood for reasons of justice.

They also have good reason to support Palestinians as fellow members of the body of Christ. The small and rapidly diminishing Arab Christian population among the Palestinians is leaving Israel in droves – and the poor economic conditions and pressure they face from Israeli occupation are at least a partial contributing factor to this phenomenon, as a Christianity Today article noted in 2020.

So, there are good reasons to support both Israel and the Palestinians, and we shouldn’t have to choose between the two. Historically, both the West and the United Nations have tried to honor the rights of both.

When the United Nations voted to create the Jewish state of Israel, they divided British Palestine into two sections and gave one section to the Palestinians and the other to the Jews.

1947 UN partition plan for Israel / Palestine and 1955 UN map of Israel (with pre-1967 boundaries) (Wikipedia)

The Palestinians then promptly attacked Israel. Although Israel defeated the Palestinians, Arab leaders in the region – especially the Egyptian president Gamul Abdel Nasser – made it a point of supporting the Palestinians and denying Israel’s right to exist. In 1964, the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) was founded with the support of Egypt as a militant group dedicated to Israel’s destruction and willing to use terrorism to accomplish its goals. Egypt and other Arab countries launched two major attacks against Israel – one in 1967 and the other in 1973 – with the intent of wiping Israel off the map. With substantial help from American weapons, Israel quickly beat back most of those attacks. After the first war in 1967, they gained control of the Arab-occupied parts of Palestine – the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

But contrary to what some might imagine, Israel never acquired the legal right to hold that territory. The United Nations passed a resolution (UN resolution 242) after the Six-Day War in 1967 demanding that Israel withdraw from that territory. “Emphasizing the inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war and the need to work for a just and lasting peace in which every State in the area can live in security,” the United Nations Security Council unanimously declared, Israel must give the territory back to the Palestinians. In the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, Western countries commonly annexed territory through war, but in the late twentieth century, after World War II, the great powers of the world were unanimous in saying that such behavior was illegal.

On paper, Israel agreed. It did not claim the right to permanently occupy the Palestinian territories. It said that its temporary occupation of the territories was needed to secure its own safety, but over time, some of its traditional enemies renounced their erstwhile desire to attack Israel. In 1978-79, Egypt made peace with Israel. In 1993, the PLO renounced terrorism and agreed that Israel had a right to exist. In return, Israel agreed to a two-state solution. Even Benjamin Netanyahu pledged his support for a two-state solution in 2009 and again in 2015.

But despite its assurances, Israel has illegally used its occupation of the West Bank to build settlements for its citizens. The result has been massive Palestinian frustration. The Palestinian Authority – the most politically moderate Palestinian organization and the best chance that Israel had for a peaceful Palestinian neighbor – has looked embarrassingly weak as a result, and many Palestinians have therefore turned to more radical (and more autocratic) organizations. The result has been less security for Israel.

As the Christian Century declared earlier this spring, “The marginalization of Palestinian moderates may have contributed to Hamas’s rise in Gaza in the first place—and this should be avoided at all costs in the West Bank.”

Some in Israel recognize this. On the Israeli left, support for a two-state solution, which was already strong before the attacks of October 7, became even stronger during the weeks after the attacks, because Israelis on the left believe that a two-state solution will not only bring justice to the Palestinians but will also enhance Israel’s own security. But among right-wing and moderate Israelis, support for a two-state solution, which was already low, became even lower after the attacks, because Israelis on the right see a Palestinian state as a breeding ground for terrorists and a threat to Israel’s future.

During the past half-century, most of the Arab world has become much more accepting of Israel than it was in the early 1970s. Egypt, once Israel’s inveterate enemy, officially recognized Israel’s right to exist after the Camp David Accords of 1978 and has been at peace with Israel ever since. Jordan has made peace with Israel. Even Saudi Arabia, the most conservative of the Arab Muslim states, appears ready to extend an olive branch to Israel if Israel will take concrete steps toward the formation of a Palestinian state. Similarly, among the Palestinians themselves, the Palestinian Authority recognizes Israel’s right to exist, which was once unthinkable.

There is more support among Arab states than ever before for Israel’s right to exist – if Israel will genuinely take immediate steps toward a state for the Palestinians. If Israel does so, it will undercut the claims of the remaining groups in the Middle East that are hostile to Israel, such as Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran.

Those who care about both Israel and the Palestinians need to denounce Hamas and all other groups that support terrorism against Israel or deny its right to exist.

But at the same time, they need to insist that Israel end its settlements in the West Bank and require Israelis living in the occupied territories to move within Israel’s pre-1967 boundaries. They need to insist that Israel act on its prior stated commitments to the formation of a Palestinian state.

Right now, Israel is facing an impasse with most of the rest of the world because of its refusal to comply with a previous UN mandate and its own previously stated commitment to allow the formation of a Palestinian state.

Pope Francis has joined the call for a two-state solution, which he has linked to his demand for an immediate end to the current war. In praying for peace in Israel, he is praying that Israel and Palestine “may be two states, free and with good relations.”

World opinion on this is nearly unanimous: A United Nations resolution to admit a Palestinian nation as a member state passed by a vote of 143 to 9 in the General Assembly this month. One of the nine votes against the resolution came from the United States, which favors a Palestinian state, but said that it needed to be created through a negotiation process with Israel and that it must come with the assurance that Gaza will not be a “platform for terrorism.”

This last point is a reasonable demand, I think. But what is not reasonable is either a categorical refusal to recognize the rights of Palestinians or a refusal to recognize Israel’s right to exist as a secure state.

The most promising path to peace and to Israel’s security is also the best path forward at this point to justice for the Palestinians.

That path is Israel’s commitment to a Palestinian state, a commitment which will need to be accompanied with outreach to the most moderate Palestinian governing group – the Palestinian Authority – along with neighboring Arab states that are willing to work with Israel to guarantee Israel’s security in exchange for the recognition of a Palestinian state. This diplomatic move will isolate Hamas, reduce radicalism among Palestinians in Gaza and elsewhere, and win back the good will of the world that has become increasingly frustrated with the refusal of Benjamin Netanyahu’s government to honor Israel’s previously made promises of a Palestinian state. In the end, it will lead to a more secure Israel – and a more secure Palestinian people.

This is a path to peace that will fulfill the principles that Glen Stassen outlined for “just peacemaking.” And as a result, it’s a peace that Christians who love both Israel and the Palestinians should support.

Politics and Religion

History and Religion

Previous Post

May 27, 2024

How Important Are Birthdays Anyway?

Next Post

May 29, 2024 Forgetting Martha Stearns Marshall: Women's Roles in the SBC

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I have an identical twin, and Thomas was always the disciple I connected with most. ..."

Terry

In the Footsteps of Thomas: A ..."

"I've never thought of Constantine as a villain. Do Christians generally? Maybe the ones who ..."

stevewe

Defending Constantine

"The TV sitcom BEWITCHED was an old favorite of mine"

philipjenkins

How Scotland Gave Us Our Modern ..."

"From now on whenever I see a clipper ship, see a certain brand of Scottish ..."

Terry

How Scotland Gave Us Our Modern ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims Piracy pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public Executions Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who touched Jesus' cloak and was healed of bleeding?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jairus' daughter A centurion Martha A woman in the crowd