Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
History and Religion
The Crisis of the Evangelical Heart

The Crisis of the Evangelical Heart

Last updated on: March 13, 2024 at 4:54 pm by Joey Cochran

0 Comments

The Crisis of the Evangelical Heart 2024-03-13T16:54:13-04:00 Joey Cochran

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

We have a crisis on our hands, and it is the crisis of the evangelical heart. At the center of this crisis is the relationship between the Church and its society. The Church has contributed to making our culture and society, and our society and culture have both enhanced and harmed the effectiveness of Christianity’s expression from one generation to the next.

Richard Niebuhr addressed how the church contributed to making our society in his essay, “The Responsibility of the Church for Society.” Niebuhr argued that the church and its society has had an important but difficult relationship throughout time. When society seems plagued with repeated miseries, the Church has an obligation to enter the misery and minister in that place, weeping along with those who weep and suffering with those who suffer.

H. Richard Niebuhr in Ministerial Gown

This sense of responsibility for the welfare of our culture and society is rooted in scripture and theology, most pertinently evidenced by the Great Commandment to love our neighbor, but also from exilic texts like Jeremiah 29:7: “Also, seek the peace and prosperity of the city to which I have carried you into exile. Pray to the Lord for it, because if it prospers, you too will prosper.” This sense of responsibility for our culture and society ought to be the heartbeat of the evangelical movement.

However, Niebuhr highlighted another reason why the Church has an obligation to society. For its part, the Church is complicit in the making of modern society. He said:

But one highly important root of the sense of obligation is the Christians’ recognition that they have done not a little to make the secular societies what they are. In this respect the modern church is in a wholly different position from that which the New Testament church or even the church of Augustine’s time occupied. The Christian community of our time, whether or not formally united, is one of the great organizations and movements in civilization; it is one of the oldest human societies; it has been the teacher of most of the nations now in existence. It cannot compare itself with the small, weak company of the early centuries living in the midst of secular societies that had grown up independently of it. The American, Russian and British empires as well as the German and Italian, challenge the Church to a sense of responsibility, therefore, which the Roman Empire could never call forth. They were not suckled in their infancy by wolves but nursed and baptized by the Church; it instructed them in their youth and has been the companion of their maturity.[1]

Christians must take ownership and responsibility for their culture and society, and they cannot wash their hands of it. Furthermore, when the culture of their own making, evangelicalism, becomes an unruly child, they cannot simply disown and disinherit it, release it into the wild, and exonerate themselves of blame. Yet, some evangelical leaders have seemingly done so with the unruly child of evangelicalism, which has led us to the crisis of the evangelical heart.

Since the 2016 Presidential election cycle, we have seen increasing rhetoric from leading intellectual evangelical spokespersons that absolves themselves of responsibility for the problem child of evangelicalism, the Christian culture they had been tasked to steward. While many tactics have been employed to do this, a common one is to argue that the evangelical coalition has fractured and fragmented. The cultural fragments they perceive as unsightly are those parts that they jettison. These thinkers perceive themselves as remnant stewards of genuine true Christianity, a past cherished idea and vision that flourished for a time but is now diminishing in its influence. Rather than collaborating across the spectrum of evangelicals to cure its distemper, these folks have attempted to hold the ground at the center until they retreat into the safe ghettos of conservative, confessional affiliations.

One of the techniques used to absolve themselves of responsibility for the cultural disarray of evangelicalism is to emphasize their fidelity to a theological definition of evangelicalism, primarily the Bebbington Quadrilateral, which asserts four values of evangelicals: biblicism, conversionism, activism, and crucicentrism.[2] Perhaps if you were to chat with Bebbington, himself, or one of his own students, you might discover that the Bebbington School only perceives the Bebbington Quadrilateral as a description, rather than a definition. Nonetheless, those who retreat to a theological definitional view of evangelicalism believe that Bebbington’s is the only acceptable definition with which they are willing to concern themselves, and they are ambivalent towards cultural interpretations of the movement. While this tactic is a helpful tell for us to see who and what has been the center of power for evangelicalism, throughout its history, it is also a deeply fraught logical fallacy, one that becomes apparent from the thought of one of their finest minds, the late Timothy Keller.

In Keller’s Center Church, he offered a theological vision for the Church. He argued in the book’s introduction that a theological vision for the Church lies between the doctrinal foundations and ministry expressions necessary to reach a cultural context. He claimed, “Before you choose specific ministry methods, you must first ask how your doctrinal beliefs ‘might relate to the modern world.’ The result of that question ‘thereby form[s] a theological vision.’” To Keller, doctrine leads to a theological vision, which produces a ministry culture and expression. Quite simply, your Church’s theology produces a philosophy, which fashions a culture. “A theological vision is a vision for what you are going to do with your doctrine in a particular time and place.”[3]

Keller believed that a theological vision is fashioned from integrating the reading of one’s doctrine and one’s surrounding culture. Doctrine, theological vision, and culture are entangled with one another. If there is something amiss in one sphere, then the other spheres are affected. Since culture adapts and evolves, then a vision to match doctrine must be restated from generation to generation. “It is critical, therefore, in every new generation and setting to find ways to communicate the gospel clearly and strikingly,” said Keller. He continued, “All churches must understand, love, and identify with their local community and social setting, and yet at the same time be able and willing to critique and challenge it.”[4]

While these principles may be applied to a local ministry, like Keller’s urban Manhattan ministry, these principles might be telescopically employed to analyze and evaluate the doctrine, theological vision, and culture of evangelical Christianity writ large. It is insufficient and irresponsible to claim only a theological understanding of evangelicalism. Evangelical theology produces a vision for society that produces a culture. If evangelical culture has become unruly, it is because its stewards have failed in their task to rightly articulate an appropriate and timely evangelical theological vision that mediates between evangelical doctrine and culture, while also being adopted and practiced faithfully by its evangelical adherents. This failure to do so has caused the crisis of the evangelical heart.

Cultural Evangelical Descriptions Reveal the State of the Evangelical Heart

Rather than attempting to define evangelicals or evangelicalisms, I find it more productive to describe evangelicals and their values from era to era. This helps me monitor the status of the evangelical heart and determine when and where the evangelical heart has been in theological and cultural crisis. One such historical example of evangelicals in theological and cultural crisis includes the Southern versus Northern response to the Civil War and the matter of enslavement (see Noll’s expert analysis of this crisis and a later reassessment by Paul Gutacker).[5]

Evangelicals have a fluid relationship with both their doctrine and culture. They have possessed a profound skill at nimbly pivoting with cultural shifts and adapting to new geographies throughout time. I believe that evangelicals generally trend towards ecumenicity and cultural accommodation rather than sectarianism and cultural retrenchment, or at least this is the case when the evangelical heart is in its healthiest condition.

While I do believe that the headwaters of evangelicalism have been intertwined with the emergence of other early modern phenomena, such as global empire and enlightenment, evangelicals have tended to transcend the limitations and threats that beset empire and enlightenment across time. Needless to say, I have long considered studies that interrogate evangelical theology from the vantage point of its cultural context as appraisals of evangelicals that I deem to be most noteworthy.

Why? I believe that cultural descriptions of evangelicals reveal the state of the evangelical heart and when the evangelical heart is in crisis. While I care much about understanding the evangelical mind, I am increasingly more concerned about the condition of the evangelical heart, especially my own evangelical heart. Cultural descriptions of evangelicalism help monitor when the evangelical heart is in crisis. If we give any due regard to recent assessments of evangelicalism, it would be plain that the evangelical heart is in crisis and too few are taking action to respond to the crisis.

For this reason, I was deeply troubled by John Fea’s assessment, in his Atlantic piece, of Beth Barr’s and Kristin Du Mez’s studies of history. When he referred to their publications as ones that were “woefully flat,” I was flummoxed. The experience I had in reading those two fine pieces of scholarship could not have been more different than his evaluation. Rather, these studies, among others, have exposed and revealed the rot that has led to the crisis of the evangelical heart.[6]

I have met a fair number of white evangelical men, who have conveyed to me their reservations and timidity to purchase and read these books, knowing the social cost that might come with being convinced by their arguments. On the other hand, I have met numerous folks, who have been deeply affected and convinced by their arguments. Those folks counted the cost and willingly paid it because of how those works affected their evangelical hearts.

I believe the popular reception of Barr’s and Du Mez’s work—as seen from the growth of their social influence, their works’ praise from various news outlets, and the manner in which it has struck a nerve and elicited a response from their detractors—overturns the validity of Fea’s excoriating comments to the contrary. Furthermore, his disparaging comments left me even more befuddled because I had personally heard him give praise to these authors for their historical contributions, in their hearing, in at least a couple professional contexts prior to his Atlantic piece.

A Conversation between Kristin Du Mez and Beth Barr

I cannot even pretend to know what moved Fea to shift so radically in his perspective towards Du Mez and Barr. After a protracted time of reflection on what actually happened with the Fea Affair, I am still puzzled. Nonetheless, I believe that this event is a microcosm of the sort of radical shifts in perspective that we will see various evangelicals take in coming decades, and how those radical shifts reveal the dire condition and crisis of the evangelical heart.

Thus far, the twenty-first century has been marked as an era of rapid technological change accompanied with tumultuous economic, political, and ecological unrest. For evangelicals to endure this era with an intact ideology and culture, they must be able to fluidly adapt, while being attuned to a theological vision that is consistent with their doctrinal values. A theological vision for effective evangelicalism in this era will be one that offers a ballast for culture and society. It will have a stabilizing affect, noted for its virtue and upside-down kingdom principles rather than turbulent and erratic sensationalism.

Our culture and society needs to be centered on a theological vision that is simple, clear, and profoundly human. A vision like this will keep the heart of culture and society beating in sync with the heart of evangelicals, who should be counted among its chief advocates. Perhaps no better vision can be commended to evangelicals than those virtues Jesus imparted to his listeners at the onset of the “Sermon on the Mount.” In Matthew 5:3 and following, Jesus explained that those who are poor in spirit, empathetic mourners, meek, merciful, pure in heart, peacemakers, and those who both crave righteousness and are willing to suffer for the sake of righteousness will be happy. Undoubtedly, this is a theological vision that has both staying power and the capacity to increase the heart health of evangelicals, if only evangelicals forego supplanting contending cultural values with those Jesus offered to his followers. Sadly, I see too few prominent evangelical voices championing these virtues or demonstrating them. Perhaps, in similar words to Jerry Bridges, we ought to preach these virtues to ourselves daily.

[1] H. Richard Niebuhr, “The Responsibility of the Church for Society [1946]” in The Responsibility of the Church for Society and Other Essays (Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2008), 63.

[2] David Bebbington, Evangelicalism in Modern Britain: A History from the 1730 to the 1980s (Abingdon: Routledge, 1989).

[3] Timothy Keller, Center Church (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2012), 18.

[4] Keller, Center Church, 22–23.

[5] Mark A. Noll, The Civil War as a Theological Crisis (Chapel Hill, University of North Carolina Press, 2006); Mark A. Noll, “Missouri, Denmark Vesey, Biblical Proslavery, and a Crisis for Sola Scripture” in Every Leaf, Line, and Letter: Evangelcals and the Bible from the 1730s to the Present, edited by Timothy Larsen (Downers Grove: Intervarsity Press, 2021), 97–122; Paul Gutacker, The Old Faith in a New Nation: American Protestants and the Christian Past (New York, Oxford University Press, 2023), 101–42).

[6] Others include, Jemar Tisby, The Color of Compromise: The Truth About the American Church’s Complicity in Racism (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2019); Beth Moore, All My Knotted Up Life: A Memoir (Carol Stream: Tyndale, 2023); Constantine R. Campbell, Jesus v. Evangelicals: A Biblical Critique of a Wayward Movement (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2023); Jon Ward, Testimony: Inside the Evangelical Movement That Failed a Nation (Grand Rapids: Brazos Press, 2023; Timothy Alberta, The Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory: American Evangelicals in an Age of Extremism.

History and Religion

Previous Post

March 11, 2024

Gregory Who?

Next Post

March 13, 2024 Reading for Life: Memories of Calderón in Costa Rica

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"The TV sitcom BEWITCHED was an old favorite of mine"

philipjenkins

How Scotland Gave Us Our Modern ..."

"From now on whenever I see a clipper ship, see a certain brand of Scottish ..."

Terry

How Scotland Gave Us Our Modern ..."

"There are no such things as witches. They were just unmarried or elderly women with ..."

Dot Newkirk

How Scotland Gave Us Our Modern ..."

"The book of THE KEEP is wonderful, but I was not such a fan of ..."

philipjenkins

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What happened to Jesus 40 days after His resurrection?

Select your answer to see how you score.

He ascended into heaven He visited the temple He performed one last miracle He went back into hiding