Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
History and Religion
Mothers of the Church: Pulcheria

Mothers of the Church: Pulcheria

Last updated on: March 19, 2024 at 2:00 am by Adam Renberg

0 Comments

Mothers of the Church: Pulcheria 2024-03-18T06:42:03-04:00 Adam Renberg

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Council of Chalcedon is famously the standard of Christological orthodoxy. The definition put forth in 451 outlines how the “saintly fathers” all confess “one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, Only-begotten, acknowledged in two natures without confusion, change, division, or separation” (Price and Gaddis, The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon, 5.204). As with all important theological documents from church history, there can be a danger of decontextualizing them—of forgetting the time, place, and people who shaped the language and categories found therein. An often forgotten key to understanding and contextualizing the council of Chalcedon (indeed, the entire course of the Christological controversies in the early 5th century) is the person who steered it: Pulcheria, the empress.

We even see evidence of her importance after the proceedings at Chalcedon, when the bishops praised Pulcheria: “It is you who drove out the heretics,” and “To the Augusta many years, to her who is pious and Christ-loving!” (The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon, 6.241) Pulcheria, a laywoman, was given praise from these clergymen because she had been embroiled in two Christological controversies, siding with ‘orthodoxy’ in both instances, despite her brother (the emperor) supporting those eventually deposed of heresy.

The Monastic Princess

Aelia Pulcheria was born in January of 398 or 399, the granddaughter of Theodosius I—the emperor who made Christianity the official religion of Rome. Her parents, Eudoxia and Arcadius, passed away during her youth, the former in 404 and the latter in 408. This left the throne to Theodosius II, who was only 7 years old at the time. Eventually, Pulcheria took charge of her brother’s education and acted as his guardian at just 15 years old, for which she was proclaimed Augusta by her brother. It appears that she was wise beyond her years though, an expert in Greek and Latin, who was able to lead with a shrewd political sensibility.

From 414 onwards, Pulcheria’s leadership took a decidedly monastic tone. The palace in Constantinople, a place of decadence and extravagance, became a house of prayer and virginity. The ancient church historians, Socrates and Sozomen, record that these imperial siblings prayed at certain hours, recited hymns together, and learned the Scriptures by heart. In all of this, Pulcheria “strove chiefly, to lead him (Theodosius) into piety, and to pray continuously; she taught him to frequent the church regularly, and to honor the houses of prayer with gifts and treasures” (Sozomen, Ecclesiastical History 9.1; See also: Socrates, Ecclesiastical History 7.22).

Pulcheria also became a consecrated virgin, committing herself to God in an act of public worship. “She first devoted her virginity to God, and instructed her sisters in the same course of life… In confirmation of her resolution, she took God, the priests, and all the subjects of the Roman empire as witnesses to her self-dedication” (Sozomen, Ecclesiastical History 9.1). And while some ancient and modern sources have speculated that she did this to retain power (rather than marry and have her husband crowned emperor), there is reason to believe that she was truly motivated to live as a holy virgin, especially in light of her grand acts of charity. “They (Pulcheria and her sisters) all pursue the same mode of life; they are sedulous about the priests and the houses of prayer, and are munificent to needy strangers and the poor” (Sozomen, Ecclesiastical History 9.3). Pulcheria was beloved by her subjects for her philanthropy from her teenage years onwards.

Pulcheria remained unmarried for nearly the rest of her life, until her brother’s death. Theodosius II died in 450, leaving behind no male heir to lead. Thus, the throne fell to Pulcheria, who ruled alone for about a month before marrying Marcian, a tribune, as required by Roman law. Pulcheria set forth a condition for their marriage though: it was to remain a celibate one. Thus, she was a consecrated virgin until her death, despite being married.

The One Who Drove Out the Heretics

Pulcheria’s entrance into theological controversies was with Nestorius, just five days after he became bishop of the imperial city, Constantinople. Apparently, she and her brother went to church to receive communion on Easter 428, in the Holy of Holies with the priests. Nestorius met her at the door and denied her entry, insisting that “only priests may walk here.” She asked: “Why? Have I not given birth to God? He replied: “You? You have given birth to Satan!” (Letter a Cosme 5-7 (Patrologia Orientalis XIII, 278; translation from Holum, Theodosian Emperesses, 153). Two elements of this exchange are noteworthy. First, Pulcheria clearly roots her spiritual authority in Mariology, that a woman gave birth to God. Second, Nestorius had not yet popularized his views rejecting the Theotokos (the title, Mother of God), for which he was eventually condemned, but he clearly had opposing theological sensibilities than Pulcheria on the role of Mary and women generally.

To avoid bogging you down with the theological details, it is worth noting that Pulcheria was instrumental in the following years, leading to the Council of Ephesus in 431. Theodosius was a staunch supporter of Nestorius, the bishop of his city, despite Pulcheria’s disdain for the man. Eventually, Cyril of Alexandria wrote to the imperial palace, pleading for Theodosius to reconsider his theological allegiance in Address to the Pious Emperor Theodosius on the Correct Faith. But, this was not the only work that he sent—he also wrote Address to the Most Pious Princesses, and Address to the Most Pious Empresses on the Correct Faith, in which he encouraged the royal women—foremost, Pulcheria—to convince Theodosius to see truth. Eventually, Nestorius is deposed at the council, for which Pulcheria seems to have a hand—both sides of the debate claim that she was the reason for Nestorius’ demise (See: Nestorius, The Bazaar Of Heracleides, 146-7; Leo, Letter 31).

Leading to Chalcedon, a similar series of events takes place, though with a different Christological heresy popularized by Eutyches. Pulcheria favored Eutyches’ deposal in 448 for the rejection of the language proposed after Ephesus, called the Formula of Union, even though Theodosius favored the so-called ‘Robber Council of Ephesus’ in 449, which vindicated Eutyches. At this point, another important ecclesiastical figure, Pope Leo, wrote to Pulcheria asking for her assistance (Leo, Letter 31) in condemning Eutyches at an ecumenical council. After her brother’s death, Marcian called the council of Chalcedon (Leo, Letter 73; See: The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon, 1.92), though there is no doubt that Pulcheria was the true force behind this decision. In the end, Eutyches was deposed and Pulcheria, once again, had fought for the side of orthodoxy. In a letter defending the council in its aftermath, Pulcheria writes, we must “confess that the Saviour Christ is one and the same Jesus Christ, perfect God and perfect man, the same God truly and the same man truly, in no way divided or converted” (Pulcheria, Pulcheria to Archimandrites in Jerusalem). All of this led to the bishop’s adulation: “It is you who drove out the heretics.”

The Trier Adventus Ivory, an enigmatic work of 4th or 5th century art, might be a depiction of Pulcheria and Marcian at the council of Chalcedon.

The New Helena

In my first post about the Mothers of the Church, I talked about the visibility problem—that there is a tendency to look past the contributions of women of faith in the early church. In some ways, Pulcheria seems to be more visible than others: She is a saint in both the Eastern and Western Churches, her feast day being held on September 10th. Further, the bishops at Chalcedon, as mentioned, recognize her devout faith and fight for Christological orthodoxy. This praise is at its peak when they claim that “Marcian is the New Constantine, Pulcheria the New Helena! You have shown the faith of Helena. You have shown the zeal of Helena. You defend the cross of Christ. Helena found it, Pulcheria rescued it” (Acts of the Council of Chalcedon, Acts 6.240). Helena is the mother of Constantine, who was famous for her piety, the model of imperial Christianity for women—something that Pulcheria, apparently, embodied perfectly.

But how does attributing the title ‘new Helena’ shift how we might approach Pulcheria? She is chiefly seen as important in relation, as the wife of the truly important figure—in other words, she has little to no political or theological achievements in her own right. And this is reflected not only in the ancient context (Socrates and Theodoret, for instance, basically pretended that she didn’t exist), but in our modern one. For example, neither the 19th century nor 20th century English translations of Leo’s Letters translate Epistle 77—a letter from Pulcheria to Leo. Apparently, either the content, or the author, was not important enough to disseminate to modern audiences. In evaluating all that Pulcheria accomplished, perhaps it is worth reconsidering her title as the New Helena—by most metrics, she, not her husband, is the ‘New Constantine’, the orchestrator of a church council. Her faith shaped not just her household, but the trajectory of the Christian faith itself–something that we’d do well to note and remember this Women’s History Month.”

Resources:

Primary sources: As far as I can tell (though someone please point this out, if I have missed it!), there are only 4 extant letters from Pulcheria’s own hand—all of them deal with the council of Chalcedon and its aftermath. These can all be found in various places in Coleman-Norton’s Roman State & Christian Church: A Collection of Legal Documents to A.D. 535 vol 1, and several can be found in Price and Gaddis’ The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon. The original source (in Greek) is listed, with accessible English translations in the hyperlinks.

Acta Conciliorum Oecumenicorum 2.1.1 ep. 9, p. 9-10 (Pulcheria to Leo, Nov. 450)

Price and Gaddis, The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon, Document 3 (1, pg. 93-4)
Coleman-Norton, Roman State & Christian Church, Document 463 (pg. 769-70)

Acta Conciliorum Oecumenicorum 2.1.1 ep. 15, p.29 (Pulcheria to Governor of Bithynia, Strategios, Sept 451)

Price and Gaddis, The Acts of the Council of Chalcedon, Document13 (1, pg. 107-108)
Coleman-Norton, Roman State & Christian Church, Document 466 (pg .773-4)

Acta Conciliorum Oecumenicorum 2.1.3 ep. 27, p. 127-129 (Pulcheria to Archimandrites in Jerusalem, Late 452 or Early 453)

Coleman-Norton, Roman State & Christian Church, Document 486 (pg 842-4)

Acta Conciliorum Oecumenicorum 2.1.3, ep. 31, p. 136 (Pulcheria to Abbess Bassa, likely 453)

Coleman-Norton, Roman State & Christian Church, Document 485 (pg 840-1)

Secondary Sources: There are not many modern works on Pulcheria, despite her prominence, but a few can orient you to the literature available:

Kenneth G. Holum, Theodosian Empresses: Women and Imperial Dominion in Late Antiquity (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1982).

Vassiliki Limberis, Divine Heiress: The Virgin Mary and the Creation of Christian Constantinople (New York: Routledge, 1994), Ch. 3.

Liz James, Empresses and Power in Early Byzantium (London: Leicester University Press, 2001)

Kathryn Chew, “Virgins and Eunuchs: Pulcheria, Politics and the Death of Emperor Theodosius II,” Historia: Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte, 55; 2 (2006), 207-227.

Philip Jenkins, Jesus Wars: How Four Patriarchs, Three Queens, and Two Emperors Decided what Christians Would Believe for the Next 1,500 Years (New York: HarperOne, 2010).

History and Religion

Mothers of the Church

Mothers of the Church

Nestorius

Pulcheria

Theodosius II

Previous Post

March 18, 2024

Megachurch Pastor Performs The Gettysburg Address

Next Post

March 20, 2024 Family History, Pretendians, and the Politics of Recognition

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I love horror but would have to acclimate back to Lovecraft and especially Machen. Have ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"Very good point about MacDonald.I am certainly a Machen fan!"

philipjenkins

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"The Scottish author George MacDonald integrated fairy world into his fiction in a way that ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"I like the idea that we can have different streams. The coffee analogy is genius."

Lisa Clark Diller

How Do You Take Your Evangelicalism?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Pentecost" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Forty Fiftieth Firstfruits Twelve