Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Donald Trump, Evangelicals, and the 2024 Election

Donald Trump, Evangelicals, and the 2024 Election

Last updated on: December 13, 2023 at 12:08 pm by Paul Thompson

0 Comments

Donald Trump, Evangelicals, and the 2024 Election 2023-12-13T12:08:00-04:00 Paul Thompson

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

They say confession is good for the soul, so I am going to confess that as a “never Trumper” I’m getting pretty worked up about the 2024 presidential election, and I need to use this post to process some of my thoughts. In addition to Trump’s continual non-presidential sounding rhetoric and attitude, trial delaying tactics, and just plain craziness, there is a spate of recent and forthcoming articles issuing dire warnings about a second Trump term. My problem is that I am inclined to believe them.

This past week The Atlantic announced that 24 of its writers will be publishing articles in the next few weeks predicting a long list of undesirable things likely to transpire in a second Trump term. Also in the last couple of weeks, Robert Kagan (son of the renowned Yale professor Donald Kagan whose textbook many of us used in college) published two Washington Post opinion pieces explaining Trump’s easy path to becoming an autocrat, and suggesting some ways Republicans can try to thwart that, although he doesn’t expect that to occur. (See here and here.) I hope he is wrong.

Then there is the steady stream of revelations from former advisers and members of his first administration in “tell all” books (and here) and in their testimonies supporting the various felony indictments against Trump. In addition to these revelations, there is the 2017 NY Times bestseller The Dangerous Case of Donald Trump written by 37 mental health professionals warning that Trump is psychologically unfit for the presidency.

It is truly unprecedented for so many scholars, journalists, and advisors to warn voters that a leading presidential candidate poses an existential threat to this nation’s democratic institutions and traditions. But despite these warnings, with just a few weeks to go before the Iowa caucuses, polling data continue to show that Trump remains light years ahead of his next closest competitors among Republican primary voters and evangelical voters.

In light of these extensive and carefully reasoned arguments and first-hand testimonies, I’m saddened that so many white evangelicals and Republican primary voters remain oblivious to the real risks of a second Trump administration. I think there are fundamental structural issues that prevent them from seeing the dangers that go beyond the fact that they are obviously not reading the Washington Post or The Atlantic, and I will offer my list of reasons.

As a historian of nineteenth-century America, I’m tempted to resort to the scholarship about republican thought in America between the mid-1700s and the mid-1800s. Although this scholarship is now considered “old” (mostly written from the1960s to the 1980s) there is a certain attraction for me in revolutionary and antebellum era republican ideology.

In the early years of our republic there were both secular and Christian forms of republican thought, but they both maintained that republics needed a virtuous citizenry in order to survive and thrive. Secular republican thought about the longevity of republics was much more cynical than Christian republicanism. These leaders believed that history taught that all republics go through the stages of birth, maturation, and inevitable decline into some kind of demagoguery based on the existence and decline of its citizens’ public virtue. The only question was how long would it take for decline to set in? Alternatively, many Christians of that era believed that their evangelistic fervor and social reform efforts could indefinitely stave off the decline of the American experiment.

Secular leaders, such as Thomas Jefferson, defined virtue in its classic sense as when “independent” citizens prioritized the public good over their private interests. If Jefferson could see us now, a long list of societal changes would undoubtedly deeply disturb him, and I’m convinced that that list would include the self-evident dearth of public virtue among our elected officials, never mind our citizenry. Jefferson would likely see America as primed to succumb to the rule of a demagogue or autocrat, and perhaps even be surprised that one had not already arisen. Merriam Webster’s dictionary defines demagogue as “a leader who makes use of popular prejudices and false claims and promises in order to gain power.” If this doesn’t describe Donald Trump, then nothing does. I also like the way Kagan describes Trump’s influence: “Trump’s power comes from his following, not from the institutions of American government.” The extent to which this statement is true, is the extent to which we should all be deeply concerned.

Call me old fashioned, but I’m inclined to believe that even though virtue is no longer part of our popular national citizenship talking points, it is nonetheless still, objectively speaking, a cultural value that is necessary for a people to successfully rule themselves. There are multiple definitions of virtue, but regardless of the definition, just like our “founding fathers” and “founding mothers,” I still believe that self-government can only be successful with virtuous citizens.

But I also have other suppositions about why Trump retains a cult following among evangelical and Republican voters despite his lack of personal integrity, coarse and offensive language, vindictive spirit, childish rants, and his active planning to undermine, if not revoke, numerous government traditions, treaties, and laws going back to the 1800s. (See here, here, and here.)

For starters, evangelicals no longer believe what James Dobson said in 1998 when speaking about Bill Clinton’s affair with Monica Lewinsky. In fact, Dobson’s support for Donald Trump in 2016 demonstrates that even he himself doesn’t believe this any longer.

As it turns out, character DOES matter. You can’t run a family, let alone a country, without it. How foolish to believe that a person who lacks honesty and moral integrity is qualified to lead a nation and the world! Nevertheless, our people continue to say that the President is doing a good job even if they don’t respect him personally. Those two positions are fundamentally incompatible. In the Book of James the question is posed, “Can both fresh water and salt water flow from the same spring” (James 3:11 NIV). The answer is no.”

I think that if Dobson’s view was right in 1998 (and it was) then it is right in 2023. This isn’t the kind of thing that changes with the political winds.

James Dobson

Another reason is because white evangelicals have so passionately embraced the very identity politics and victimhood mentality that they loathe to see racial and other marginalized groups claim. Trump knows this better than they do themselves, and he’s expert at channeling those sentiments. Truth is, people who do not see themselves as somehow victimized or aggrieved have little reason to vote for Trump.

Identity politics comes into play in yet another way. Many conservatives are unable to hear truth spoken by people who are not conservatives. To their own intellectual loss, they downplay or dismiss a message based on the identity of the messenger, rather than the merits of the message. Of course this is also a problem for most progressives, and explains why the term echo chamber was created to describe Americans’ current communication proclivities.

Then there is good old-fashioned fear. Evangelical voters are much more motivated by fear of all things Democratic than they are willing to admit. Their fear combines with the absence of a comprehensive biblical framework for civic participation in a pluralistic society, thereby leaving them highly susceptible to manipulation by those most adept at communicating through our media ecosystem.

Oh yes, our media ecosystem. Regardless of one’s educational level, most Americans find our current information ecosystem overwhelming and exhausting. Between TikTok, YouTube, X (formerly called Twitter), Instagram, Facebook, and podcasts — and oh yes, cable and network news, newspapers, and magazines – there is just way too much highly curated information for most people to find enough accurate information on which to base their civic involvement, including their voting. Most people lack the time, the intellectual skill set, or the mental or emotional stamina to sift through the blizzard of information, misinformation, and disinformation coming at them daily. It’s truly a frightful situation for citizens needing good information to rule themselves.

This information vacuum — or worse, confusion—means more and more voters are either susceptible to Trump’s overly simplistic rhetoric or are completely oblivious about many issues. (I think Democrats on average try to embrace a little more complexity and nuance in their public policy decisions than Republicans, who only have had only one policy since Ronald Reagan: “reduce the federal government.”) For example, do most voters really understand the ramifications of Trump’s anti-NATO stance? Do most voters really understand how China used Trump’s failure to appoint ambassadors during his first term to increase its influence throughout the global south? Do most voters understand the ramifications of Russia defeating the Ukraine? These issues remind me of Britain’s 2016 Brexit vote when 51.9% voted to leave the EU, but as of November 30th this year, only 33% still think it was the right decision. I suspect the ramifications of the vote were likely too complex for the average voter to fully comprehend.

Finally, as long as the Democrats nominate Joe Biden, many Republicans who are relatively uninspired Trump voters will not be drawn away. Biden tragically failed to pick a capable VP to whom he could pass his mantle after four year. That was a great disappointment to me.

Our national political institutions are desperately in need of a re-design. They obviously do not produce good nominees any more. With both Republicans and Democrats each respectively representing just 28% of Americans, that means something like half or less of each party will nominate the candidates that all of us will vote on next November. No wonder the rest of us constantly complain about the choices we have in the general election. Hopefully Republican primary voters will nominate someone else, and hopefully Biden will step down at the last minute. We need some truly viable nominees.

These percentages suggest to me that one appropriate response to Trump’s efforts to undermine our governmental institutions is for more of us to become active –or more active– in our American experiment in self-government. The least that each of us can do is find a way to participate in our self-government experiment in 2024 in a new way. If you haven’t voted before, make sure you get registered and you vote, in at least one election next year. Maybe you normally only vote in the general election. Next year vote in the primary. maybe you have never donated to a candidate, or volunteered for one. Next year is a good time to try it. There are many local and state officials running for office in addition to the president. For me, I have signed up to work the polls for the first time in my life. I am excited to be a non-partisan part of ensuring a free and fair election process. Election deniers have been abusing poll workers something terrible in recent years, resulting in many resignations, and I certainly don’t want a manpower shortage in my county. As long as I can, I want to do my part to support this great American experiment in self-rule. After all, as Benjamin Franklin told one lady, we have a republic, but only “if we can keep it.”

Presidential Election

trump

Previous Post

December 8, 2023

Memoir, History, and the Historian

Next Post

December 12, 2023 Please Think Better about Race

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I love horror but would have to acclimate back to Lovecraft and especially Machen. Have ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"Very good point about MacDonald.I am certainly a Machen fan!"

philipjenkins

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"The Scottish author George MacDonald integrated fairy world into his fiction in a way that ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"I like the idea that we can have different streams. The coffee analogy is genius."

Lisa Clark Diller

How Do You Take Your Evangelicalism?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many books are in the New Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

13 27 21 30