Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
History and Religion
Facing Fears with an Evangelical Faith

Facing Fears with an Evangelical Faith

Last updated on: July 13, 2023 at 10:13 am by Joey Cochran

0 Comments

Facing Fears with an Evangelical Faith 2023-07-13T10:13:46-04:00 Joey Cochran

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Tumultuous times of transition in the academic, evangelical, political, and social spheres have brought evangelical historians to an interesting midpoint of the summer. These conditions potentially foster fears that plausibly lead to the opportunity of faith.

This past spring, a number of colleges and universities announced their closing, notable from the Christian sector included the announcement from King’s College in Manhattan. Then more news of transitions came from Manhattan in May, with the passing of Timothy Keller, heir of the neo-evangelicals, a sire to the Reformed-Resurgence movement, and co-founder of TGC. SCOTUS delivered two key decisions related to education in late June, including rejecting Biden’s plan of student loan forgiveness and effectively ending affirmative action. Meanwhile, we’re all trying to figure out where to process these transitions, for Elon Musk continues to blunder his way through owning Twitter, by creating too much friction for users. A mass exodus to alternate social platforms—such as Mastodon, Bluesky, and Post—has perhaps found its terminus with Meta’s launch of the Threads application, which reported to have 100 million users within days of its launch.

These sudden cultural turns do not happen in a vacuum. Individuals are affected by them, while they manage their own adversity. Sometimes we conceal private adversity for the sake of everyone else, who seem overly burdened with managing the affairs of these meta cultural shifts. I’d say that’s the case for me. Too long have I played the role of the public intellectual, always ready to respond to and speak into the issues of cultural adversity, while quietly carrying the burdens of personal adversity. Nonetheless, doing so has been to the detriment of cultivating the opportunity of faith by conveying how I’ve faced my fears.

I began to ponder this following a major transition that occurred in our family life. This last week, we laid to rest our beloved Maltese, Lenny. Fortunately, we were blessed that he had quite the long life of sixteen years. Our decision to transition him came after two long years of observing his decline. The affects of blindness, deafness, immobility, and incontinence—along with increasing signs that he was in real pain and discomfort—caused us to share with our children that it was time. Since our oldest is fourteen, essentially, none of our children know a world without Lenny. This past week has been a time of deep grief for all of us, grief we didn’t think would be there.

But that’s not all. The decline of Lenny has occurred concomitant to the decline of my father. Nearly two years ago, my father went missing, after leaving home to get a haircut, go to Home Depot, and then pick up some pool chemicals from Leslie Pools. After nearly twenty-four hours, he was found three hours from home in Northeast, Texas, near the Texarkana border. It was at that time that my mother and he decided to get a definitive diagnosis of dementia. Granted, we all suspected this condition when he was in his late fifties, and we kept finding post-it note reminders all over his home office. However, over the last couple decades, the situation shifted from seemingly innocuous absent-mindedness that made good fodder for jokes and jests about dad’s “memory” to real endangerment and risk to his safety in his late seventies.

Why have I quietly concealed this burden? Imagine being a historian on the hunt for a tenure-track position in your early forties, while personally wondering whether the condition of your father lies dormant within you. I mean, our profession relies on the use of memory.

I’ve always prided myself in having a stellar one. I’ve credited it to certain habits. Voracious reading, storytelling, and writing are among those habits. As an elementary aged child, I told such good stories to my teachers that they pushed me to compete in UIL as a storyteller. That was the start to discovering my love and skill for teaching. I’ve never been a notetaker. Left-handedness never lent itself to fostering penmanship, so my notetaking has always been sporadic. Perhaps that’s what caused me to skillfully map webs of information in my mind to reinforce oral and reading comprehension. While my penmanship is atrocious, I’ve been fortunate to benefit from the keyboarding power of the digital age, in order to compensate for my poor penmanship and facilitate a love of composition.

Nonetheless, facing the fear of memory loss has reinforced new habits. I make meticulous visual presentations for my lectures because they provide a handy tool for reviewing the lecture material during the hour or minutes prior to a lecture. I have developed an extensive digital archive of primary and secondary sources. I leverage social media as a record of my reading. I can refer back to it to recall important quotes, their sources, and when and where I read them.

The fear of memory loss has also created a sense of urgency, which is counter-intuitive for me. Because my personal disposition is that of a risk-taker, I attempt to counteract the propensity to carelessness that commonly accompanies risk-taking with patience and prudence. I let my study and research bake until I feel certain it is time to unveil my interpretations and conclusions. I also attempt to be clear when my ideas are experimental. In fact, I employ social media to publicly workshop and experiment with ideas and interpretations of history. The process of being a slow professor or intellectual has proven immensely beneficial, as I commonly uncover more archival data that complexifies and thickens the texture of my research, which sometimes moves it into a new trajectory.

Fundamentally, the fear of memory loss has caused me to be a more vigilant and curious historian, who values both the breadth of general macro-histories and the depth of detailed micro-histories. I cannot settle to be merely an intellectual historian because I know the bearing that social and cultural contexts have on an intellectual’s development, nor can I settle for merely mastering the discipline of history, for I know that having a depth of understanding in other disciplines augments my mastery of the historical discipline.

Lately, I’ve been revisiting historical methodology and practice, specifically in reference to the project of Christian history. The summer is optimal for carving out balcony time to re-assess and re-evaluate how I’ve been doing as a “Christian historian” who works with the history of Christianity in its modern context. It’s not just student evaluations that stimulated this interest. My work with the Conference on Faith and History burdens me with this introspective responsibility, as well as current issues in our discipline.

The publication of Myth America (Basic Books, 2023), edited by Kevin Kruse and Julian Zelizer, has stoked the fires, once again, of tensions between ideological histories from the right and ideological histories from the left. Johann Neem’s review of the book at The Hedgehog Review represents these tensions. I found the review curious because Neem appeared offended that Kruse and Zelizer did not write the book he wanted them to write, one that legitimated his ideological commitments as well as theirs.

This review caused me to step back and revisit how everyday AHA historians probably perceive CFH and a historian like me, at a place like Wheaton College. Over the past couple years at CFH, I have striven to facilitate fellowship between believing historians, while fostering welfare between our niche guild and the wider guild of historians. I’ve also tried to figure out how to be a Christian teaching history from a Christian informed framework, while also maintaining the values of a liberal and pluralistic society.

Hence, over the past couple days I’ve been re-reading Marsden’s The Outrageous Idea of Christian Scholarship (OUP, 1997), revisiting select chapters from History and the Christian Historian (Eerdmans, 1998) and Religious Advocacy and American History (Eerdmans, 1999), and I’ve dipped into Kathleen Wellman’s Hijacking History (OUP, 2021). The process of doing so has been enlightening. It seems the problems I’m concerned about have been the perennial problems of evangelical historians since the conception of the neo-evangelical movement and the attempt to place it in a longer history of evangelicalism.

I’ve drawn two conclusions that lead to two suggested proposals. First, we live in an era where we have to manage ideological tensions rather than resolve them. Second, a context of uncertainty is the opportunity to be faithful in the face of our fears.

To illustrate these conclusions and proposals, I’d like to use anecdotes inspired by my research on William James, the founder of the American school of psychology, co-founder of the philosophical school of pragmatism, and professor at Harvard University from 1872–1910.

If Christ Came to Chicago and Pragmatic Liberal Pluralism

W. T. Stead (1849–1912)

Recently, I shared the following quote from W. T. Stead’s, If Christ Came to Chicago (Laird and Lee, 1894), on social media:

“The gulf between the rich and poor which modern society seems to widen can only be bridged in one way, namely, by the personal sacrifice of individuals in personal service to man and woman” (132).

My CFH colleague, Elesha Coffman, rightly commented on Facebook:

“That’s a really silly statement, yet one that a lot of people would rather believe than the reality that massive, systemic problems require massive, systemic solutions.”

Much could be said about this, so I’ll try to be concise. First, Elesha’s critical engagement is absolutely sound. Out of context this notion is simplistic and absolutizing in a problematic manner. There are alternate proposals that should be entertained, and Elesha offers one such suggestion.

I originally shared the quote because I was bookmarking it for research. I bookmarked it not simply because I thought it was an important idea but because William James thought it was an important idea. You see, the copy I am reading of W. T. Stead’s If Christ Came to Chicago was William James’s personal copy, marked up by him. I’ve enjoyed reading this copy because I can see James’s marginalia and reflect on what he thought was important about Stead’s reporting.

Second, both the quote and Elesha’s response represent ideological commitments that are commonly set against one another and characterize what most would assume are ideological commitments from the right and from the left, respectively. Most fascinating is that when you put the quote in its context, you will see that Stead is teasing out how individual action can lead to systemic changes. The quote comes from the conclusion of his chapter on the 19th precinct of Chicago and follows his comparison of social conditions in Chicago near the river to social conditions near the lake. He reproaches the rich, who live by the lake, for not being concerned about the needs of the poor, who live by the river.

Stead begins the next chapter by commending individual saloon keepers, who subsidized free lunches to vagrants from liquor profits in their saloons. Approximately 60,000 citizens were fed lunch daily by the 3,000 saloon keepers in Chicago. Before you could shoe the shoeless with a pair of Tom’s in the early 2000s, you could feed the out of work by purchasing a dram of whisky in the late 1890s. The charity of these individual saloon keepers complicates our perception of the temperance movement. The temperance movement’s systemic agenda to address intemperance in society with the public policy of prohibition eventually would amplify hunger because the public policy would thwart the ingenious efforts of individual saloon keepers to alleviate the hunger of their clientele.

You see, there is always a trade-off when you attempt to negotiate between free-market capitalism and social-democracy. Both systems offer solutions. One has to manage the tension and determine which solution is pragmatic.

Sadly, uncertain times problematize which solution to pursue. We live in an era where a two-party system is increasingly polarized and so are the economic policies that follow those systems. Thus, if we are to maintain a liberal and pluralistic society, we have to be able to manage tensions and live faithfully in the midst of various options and solutions that may be simultaneously employed to resolve these tensions. We need systemic and individual action working in cooperation.

Marsden’s Outrageous Idea of Christian Scholarship reminded me of this principle, and he did so by retrieving William James:

William James, in his famous essay “What Pragmatism Means,” provides a helpful image of how a liberal pluralistic society ought to work. James describes pragmatic liberal discourse as ‘like a corridor in a hotel. Innumerable chambers open out of it. In one you may find a man writing an atheistic volume; in the next someone on his knees praying for faith and strength; in the third a chemist investigating a body’s properties. In a fourth a system of idealistic metaphysics is being excogitated; in a fifth the impossibility of metaphysics is being shown. But they all own the corridor, and all must pass through it if they want a practicable way of getting into or out of their respective rooms.’ I find this image quite congenial. Essentially my position is that in a pluralistic society we have little choice but to accept pragmatic standards in public life. (Kindle loc. 561–66)

In other words, various solutions may work to assuage or resolve the tension. Selecting the one that you think works best for you is your responsibility, and a liberal society offers the freedom for various people and groups to procure their solutions. Additionally, it is your responsibility to respect the alternate methods and decisions of others because we all share the same space.

William James (1842–1910)

Experimental Pedagogy and Facing Fears with Faith

This fall I will teach “American History to 1865.” I’ve elected to adopt Thomas Kidd’s American History, Volume 1 and juxtapose it to Volume 1 of YAWP. It’s an experiment inspired by Lendol Calder’s essay “Uncoverage: Towards a Signature Pedagogy for the History Survey” (The Journal of American History [March 2006]:1358–70).

This past spring I followed Calder’s technique for my “American History from 1865” course, using Howard Zinn’s and Paul Johnson’s histories as my texts. In my student evaluations, one student excoriated me for using inferior texts and focusing my pedagogy on a German inspired seminar style rather than filling students with awe from brilliant lectures. The student’s evaluation implied that I designed the course to camouflage my inadequacy to teach the course.

Reading that evaluation was a rough experience but an opportunity to extend a liberal and pluralistic mindset with someone whom I share space. I had to remind myself that this student’s expectations and desires were different from mine, and I needed to accept and recognize that student’s liberty to express those views.

Nonetheless, this student evaluation shook my confidence about my plan for the fall. Again, William James has been helpful.

From 1876–78, James experienced a number of transitions. He met and married Alice Gibbens, and she became the compass to direct his emotional, social, and intellectual energy. He became stubbornly committed to Harvard University, despite John Hopkins attempts to court him and Harvard extending to him only part-time contracts for his work (Richardson, William James: In the Maelstrom of American Modernism, 212–15).

During this time, he drafted the essay “Rationality, Activity and Faith” which was published a few years later in The Princeton Review 58 (July–September, 1882): 58–86. This essay offers summaries of protean ideas that he had been developing into his notions of consciousness, pragmatism, and positive psychology. These notions would reach their maturity in his publications: Principles of Psychology (New York, 1890), The Will to Believe (New York, 1897), The Varieties of Religious Experience (New York, 1902), and Pragmatism (New York, 1907).

I found his definition of faith in this essay reassuring:

Now there is one element of our active nature which the Christian religion has emphatically recognized, but which philosophers as a rule have with great insincerity tried to huddle out of sight in their pretension to found systems of absolute certainty. I mean the element of Faith. Faith means belief in something concerning which doubt is still theoretically possible; and as the test of belief is willingness to act, one may say that faith is the readiness to act in a cause the prosperous issue of which is not certified to us in advance. It is in fact the same moral quality which we call courage in practical affairs…the power to trust, to risk a little beyond the literal evidence, is an essential function. (70, 71)

James goes on to illustrate the act of faith by recounting the dilemma of a climber who comes to a chasm that he must leap across. James described the climber’s faith as one which results in two plausible conclusions. First, the climber’s faith may inspire him to muster a confident courage to achieve what otherwise might have been impossible. Second, his faith might be grounded in fear and despair, which causes him to plumet into the abyss. He draws this conclusion about faith:

In this case, and it is one of an immense class, the part of wisdom is clearly to believe what one desires, for the belief is one of the indispensable preliminary conditions of the realization of its object. There are then cases where faith creates its own verification. Believe, and you shall be right, for you shall save yourself. Doubt, and you shall again be right, for you shall perish. The only difference is that to believe is greatly to your advantage. (75)

In the end, we have to face our fears in a way that cultivates faith rather than despair. Whether our fear is death, memory loss, job security, institutional death, unsettling turns in public policy, or the end of modernism, democracy, and evangelicalism (see Jake Meador’s Mere Orthodoxy piece)—faith must manifest as an opportunity and possibility rather than doubt and despair.

History and Religion

Previous Post

July 7, 2023

Parents' Rights, Religious Freedom, and the State

Next Post

July 12, 2023 On Saying Goodbye to a Beloved Church

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"The TV sitcom BEWITCHED was an old favorite of mine"

philipjenkins

How Scotland Gave Us Our Modern ..."

"From now on whenever I see a clipper ship, see a certain brand of Scottish ..."

Terry

How Scotland Gave Us Our Modern ..."

"There are no such things as witches. They were just unmarried or elderly women with ..."

Dot Newkirk

How Scotland Gave Us Our Modern ..."

"The book of THE KEEP is wonderful, but I was not such a fan of ..."

philipjenkins

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What is the shortest verse in the Bible in English?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Rejoice Pray always Jesus wept God is love