Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
History and Religion
Martin Luther King Jr.’s Christian Apologetics

Martin Luther King Jr.’s Christian Apologetics

Last updated on: June 27, 2023 at 2:00 am by Daniel K. Williams

0 Comments

Martin Luther King Jr.’s Christian Apologetics 2023-06-23T22:53:55-04:00 Daniel K. Williams

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It was a hot summer in Montgomery, Alabama, in 1956. The temperature soared to 100 degrees Fahrenheit in August and highs remained in the 90s for weeks.

Walking in Montgomery during the bus boycott

But what made the summer especially miserable for the African Americans who lived in Alabama’s capital city was their standoff with the city authorities over the issue of racial segregation. Ever since the previous December, the vast majority of Montgomery’s Blacks had refused to ride the buses in protest over the city’s segregation policies on its public transportation and over the arrest of Rosa Parks. The city had fought back. The home of Martin Luther King Jr., the 27-year-old Baptist pastor who was leading the bus boycott was bombed in the early spring. King was also arrested later that year. Segregation on the city’s buses continued, and so did African Americans’ refusal to ride them.

King’s organization, the Montgomery Improvement Association, operated a carpool with 300 cars to give rides to some of the people who had depended on bus transportation to get to their jobs and other places of necessity, but those 300 cars were not enough for everyone who might have needed a ride. And so, all through the long, hot summer people walked. “It is more honorable to walk in dignity than ride in humiliation,” King said. “We decided to substitute tired feet for tired souls, and walk the streets of Montgomery.”

At the end of the year, the Supreme Court would declare Montgomery’s system of bus segregation unconstitutional, and the bus boycott would end with victory for Montgomery’s African Americans, who would be able to ride on newly desegregated buses. But at the end of the summer, Montgomery’s Blacks had no way of knowing when, if ever, this victory would come. And they were tired.

King knew that some of his congregants at the Dexter Avenue Baptist church in Montgomery were probably asking the question of where God was in the struggle. So, in September he preached a sermon about the reasons why he believed in God even in the midst of injustice and the challenges of life.

We don’t often think of King as a Christian apologist. When we think of Christian apologetics, the names that might first come to mind are people like Tim Keller or C.S. Lewis or any number of others who have written books arguing for the rationality of Christian belief or theistic affirmations. King never wrote a book about reasons to believe. But when he stood before his congregation in Montgomery, Alabama, in 1956, King offered an apologetic for his Christian faith by outlining his reasons for believing in God even in the midst of adversity.

In 1956, there were several different common approaches to Christian apologetics. Evidentialist apologetics, which relied on historical evidence to demonstrate the historicity of biblical narratives (including narratives of biblical miracles, such as the resurrection of Jesus) and on scientific evidence to suggest that the well-ordered universe must have been created by a divine designer, had been popular since the late seventeenth century, at the dawn of the Enlightenment, and they were still the preferred apologetic approach for some conservative evangelicals. They were the still the leading method of apologetics taught at Wheaton College, where students were expected to take one class in philosophical defenses of Christian theism and another in historical evidence of the Bible’s accuracy – a class that relied heavily on evidence from twentieth-century biblical archaeology.

King never showed any interest in evidentialist apologetics or the classic philosophical proofs of God’s existence that were taught in classes such as those at Wheaton. This was not surprising, since few African Americans had ever gravitated toward evidentialist apologetics or natural theology. All of the books in that field of apologetics had been written by whites, who were asking questions that did not seem to resonate with most African Americans.

But there were other approaches to apologetics that were also common in the 1950s. A few conservative Reformed evangelicals – especially those who were influenced by the theologians and philosophers at Calvin College or Westminster Theological Seminary – were proponents of some form of worldview or presuppositionalist apologetics. Unlike evidentialists, worldview apologists did not try to present evidence to support any particular Christian claim, but instead argued that the entire Christian worldview presented a more coherent picture of the world than the secular worldview did.

Worldview apologetics was closer to the liberal Protestant or neo-orthodox theology that King had learned in his graduate study at Crozer Theological Seminary in Pennsylvania and Boston University, but liberal Protestants of the time placed greater emphasis than Reformed evangelicals did on the connection between Christianity and democracy or human rights. In their opinion, the Christian worldview was correct not only because it offered the most coherent view of human psychology and human nature but also because it offered the only possible framework for a view of human dignity that was the foundation for human rights and American democracy.

In his studies of Reinhold Niebuhr, the Boston personalists, and other mid-twentieth-century American theologians, King had encountered numerous voices who made some version of this argument. But as he stood before his congregation on a Sunday morning in September 1956 and faced people who had lived with racial segregation and the lack of voting rights for their entire lives – and who had just spent months walking in the Montgomery heat because they refused to endure the indignity of moving to the back of a segregated bus – he knew that the liberal Protestant arguments about Christianity providing a foundation for American democracy would probably sound hollow.

Why should the people in his congregation believe in God? What reason did they have for holding onto their faith in the midst of injustice?

King argued that the reality of evil and injustice gave people even more reason to believe in God. “Real, determined faith in God,” King said, “gives you the conviction that although trouble is rampant, that although you stand amid the forces of injustice, it will not last always because God controls the universe.” The idea of a personal God “gives life a meaning and a purpose that it could never have without Him,” he declared.

Martin Luther King Jr.

“I say that if there is not a God, there ought to be one; and since there ought to be a God, there is a God; and if man doesn’t find the God of the universe, he’ll make him a God,” King said. “He’s got to find something that he would worship and give his ultimate allegiance to. And I say this morning that the Christian religion talks about a God, a personal God, who’s concerned about us, who is our Father, who is our Redeemer. And this sense of religion and of this divine companionship says to us, on the one hand, that we are not lost in a universe fighting for goodness and for justice and love all by ourselves. It says somehow that although we live amid the tensions of life, although we live amid injustice, no matter what we live amid, it’s not going to be like that always.”

The God that King believed the universe pointed to was not merely a spiritual force or the impersonal God of some of the deists. The existence of love and justice in the universe suggested a God who was deeply personal and caring, King believed. “Religion at its best does not look upon God as a process, not as some impersonal force that is a mere moral order that guides the destiny of the universe,” King told his church in Montgomery. “High religion looks upon God as a personality. . . . God is much higher than we are. But there is something in God that makes it so that we are made in his image. God can think; God is a self-determined being. God has a purpose. God can reason. God can love. Aristotle used to talk about God as ‘Unmoved Mover,’ but that’s not the Christian God. Aristotle’s God is merely a self-knowing God, but the Christian God is an other-loving God. He reaches out with His long arm of compassion and love and embraces all of His children.”

But was this merely wishful thinking? The argument that there must be a God because it was the only way to secure love and justice and the higher values of the universe might strike some as circular reasoning or merely a wishful assertion.

But King had one other argument for God that was deeply rooted in the African American Christian tradition: the evidence of personal experience of God. Many of the greatest African American resisters of injustice – people such as Harriet Tubman and Sojourner Truth – had heard directly from God and had a sense of God’s presence. Anglo-American Christian apologetics was based on the assumption that God’s existence must be demonstrated through reasoned evidence for people who had never sensed God’s presence directly. But what if they did have direct experience with God’s presence? Could that count as legitimate evidence of God?

King believed that it could. In a seminary class during his second year at Crozer, he wrote a paper titled “The Place of Reason and Experience in Finding God,” in which he argued that experience of God constituted legitimate evidence for God’s existence. Direct experience with God did not have to include hearing God’s audible voice – though for some African American Christians, it clearly did. “Religious experience is not an intellectual formulation about God, it is a lasting acquaintance with God,” King wrote in his seminary class paper. “So it is quite obvious that religious experience ranges from an every day experience with reality to the very height of mystic ecstasy.” And all of that, he argued, could serve as legitimate reason to believe in God.

In his seminary paper, King cited the turn-of-the-century Harvard psychologist William James for the argument that religious experience could be a legitimate way to find God and know that God exists, but in his sermon in Montgomery, he credited the idea to an older source: the enslaved people on southern cotton plantations who found God through a direct encounter. They were “the greatest psychologists that America’d ever known” because of their recognition that faith in the promise that their suffering would not last forever gave them the strength to go on.

So, in his Christian apologetic, King did not feel the need to prove God’s existence from abstract principles or provide historical arguments for the Bible’s veracity in order to argue for the existence of the Christian God. Instead, he pointed out that without a personal God of justice and love, there would be no hope in the struggle and no “meaning and purpose” in life. And then he could point to the evidence of personal experience to show that the God that people hoped for and longed for really did exist. He could remind the people in his congregation that in the moment when things looked most hopeless, faith in God was more necessary than ever. If the struggle seemed difficult even with God’s presence, it would be impossible without God – because there would be no meaning in the struggle at all and no guarantee of a better day.

King’s sermon worked. After his message, African Americans maintained their bus boycott for another three months. By Christmas that year, they could celebrate the end of segregation on Montgomery’s buses and the end of one phase of their long struggle for civil rights.

The arguments for faith in God that King presented in Montgomery continued to guide him for the rest of his life. In his last public address, delivered in Memphis the day before he was assassinated, he employed biblical imagery of the “promised land” to speak of his confidence that victory over injustice would be achieved, even if he would not live to see it. It was his faith in God’s justice that gave him an unshakeable hope that the cause of right would prevail in the end, no matter how difficult things looked.

But King’s arguments for God were very different from those of most white Christian apologists – especially the arguments of Christian evidentialists. The main reason for that, I suspect, is that traditional evidentialist apologetics attempts to find clues to an absent God from history and science. For people who have never sensed God, white Christian evidentialist apologists have pointed to evidence from the complexity of the universe to argue that the cosmos must have had a designer and they have appealed to evidence from historical testimony to argue that the gospels present an accurate record of Jesus’s life and resurrection. It is an apologetic based entirely on an academic study of evidence rather than an examination of personal experience or psychological need. But that form of evidentialism has been almost entirely unknown in the historic Black church.

Instead, African American Christian apologetics, including the sort that Martin Luther King appealed to, was premised on the idea that God is not absent and that people do not have to look to history or to the creation of the universe to find clues to God’s existence. Instead, they can find evidence for God from their own experience with God in the present and from their deepest longings. If injustice seems to be prevailing at the moment, it is a reminder that people need to look more deeply to find evidence of God at work even in the present – because it is in the darkest moments of injustice that the promises of God’s justice and the ultimate triumph of the right can appear more real than ever.

I’m not sure that this form of apologetic would seem persuasive to people who have not experienced deep longings for justice and who have not walked the hot streets of a segregated city in order as a protest for human dignity. There’s a reason that King’s apologetic arguments were not taught at the time in white Christian college classes on evidences for Christianity.

But for those who were participants in the struggle, King’s evocation of the longing for transcendent justice and his reminder of people’s personal experience with God formed a persuasive argument for faith.

History and Religion

African American Religion

American Religious History

apologetics

Baptists

Civil Rights Movement

Daniel K. Williams

Martin Luther King

Previous Post

June 26, 2023

Religion, Race, and Never Have I Ever: A Roundtable on Season Four

Next Post

June 28, 2023 Berlin and Baylor: Models for Memorializing a Difficult Past

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"I love horror but would have to acclimate back to Lovecraft and especially Machen. Have ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"Very good point about MacDonald.I am certainly a Machen fan!"

philipjenkins

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"The Scottish author George MacDonald integrated fairy world into his fiction in a way that ..."

Terry

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"I like the idea that we can have different streams. The coffee analogy is genius."

Lisa Clark Diller

How Do You Take Your Evangelicalism?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to 1 John, what three things testify on earth?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Prayer, fasting, and almsgiving The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit The Spirit, the water, and the blood Faith, hope, and love