Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

anxiousbench

The Myth Of 1453, And How Empires Do Not End

Last updated on: April 24, 2023 at 11:36 am   by Philip Jenkins

0 Comments

The Myth Of 1453, And How Empires Do Not End 2023-04-24T11:36:37-04:00 Philip Jenkins

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

This post concerns a year in which not much happened, or at least, far less than we often think. I’ll explain that cryptic remark.

I have published quite a bit on Eastern Christian traditions, most recently in my forthcoming book A Storm of Images: Iconoclasm and Religious Reformation in the Byzantine World (Baylor University Press). That dealt with the eighth and ninth centuries, but more recently I have been working on the Late Byzantine period, and the diverse manifestations of the Byzantine inheritance through subsequent European history and culture: to borrow the title of Nicolae Iorga’s classic work, it concerns “Byzantium After Byzantium.” Mine is an ongoing project, and I am not entirely sure just what the eventual outcome will look like. I know it won’t be a straight history of the era, because we have excellent studies of that kind by Jonathan Harris, Michael Angold, Donald Nicol, and others. Anyway, watch this space.

The year I am discussing is 1453, and more specifically a day in that year, May 29, which is one of the most famous in world history. On that date, the victorious forces of the Ottoman sultan, Mehmet II, captured the city of Constantinople, which had been established some 1,100 years previously as the New Rome, the capital of the Roman Empire. Still in 1453, it remained the capital of an entity that called itself the Roman Empire, and its final Christian ruler bore the distinguished name of Constantine, the eleventh ruler of that name. That Constantine XI, of the Palaiologos dynasty, perished heroically in the final battle. Edward Gibbon, who really admired him, wrote that “The distress and fall of the last Constantine are more glorious than the long prosperity of the Byzantine Cæsars.”

So much is well known and often recounted, and that date of 1453 often appears as a pivotal moment in the titles of textbooks and college history courses. Even so, the actual meaning of that event is subject to many different interpretations: literally a whole book – and a sizable one – could be written on the rhetorical uses of 1453. According to taste, it symbolized the catastrophic fall of a great Christian civilization before the aggression of the faith of Islam; or it was the triumph of the true Islamic faith over Christian error. In modern Turkey, the authoritarian Islamist regime of Recep Tayyip Erdogan has made a point of commemorating this glorious triumph annually, and Erdogan himself has tweeted “May Sultan Mehmed II of the Ottomans and his army rest in peace!” In 2022, he declared that “As our ancestors buried Byzantium, let us hope that today, by building our vision for 2053, we also manage to put in the time warp of history the current Byzantines who are plotting against us.” In contrast, Orthodox Christians recalled the fall of Constantinople as a profound trauma: this was “the day the world ended.”

Older accounts suggested that the Ottoman conquest had directly caused the mass flight of Byzantine scholars to Western Europe, where they sparked the Renaissance in Italy in elsewhere. Coinciding so closely as it does with other key dates, such as the invention of printing and the beginning of European global exploration, the Fall of Constantinople this provides a neatly symbolic marker of the birth of a new world order centered in then-Catholic Western Europe. Different nations have their own particular takes on “the Fall,” their own memories and mythological systems. It has an amazing resonance in Russian history and culture, as well as those of pretty much every Orthodox Christian society.

Another of those mythologies with a strong contemporary relevance involves the supposed clash of civilizations, and specifically the confrontation between a Christian “West” and a demonized Islam. In modern polemics directed against Islam, conservatives often depict 1453 as a historic defeat for Western civilization, and (by implication) a key stage in an Islamic invasion of Europe, a region where, in reality, the Ottomans had already been well established for over a century. This conservative narrative finds a stark visual symbol in the church of Hagia Sophia, once the world’s largest Christian structure, before its conversion to become a mosque. As I’ll suggest in a later posting, you may not realize just how powerful and commonplace those perceptions can be unless you are well versed in the wide world of Far Right conspiracy theory.

Generally, scholars do not write books on years in which nothing particular happened, but an excellent case can be made for a study of this kind focused on 1453. To take a couple of examples, it is certainly true that the Ottoman power grew mightily in Anatolia and south-eastern Europe, replacing what had once been a very powerful Roman/Byzantine realm. But that Byzantine empire had never fully recovered from its conquest and sack by fellow Christians in 1204. If not the Fall of the Roman Empire, this was at least a Fall. Although a Greek empire was restored in 1261, it was very weak and extraordinarily prone to endemic civil wars. It was increasingly hemmed in by fellow-Christians – Serbians and Bulgarians – not to mention the Ottoman Turks. It survived solely and entirely on the strength of the fortifications of Constantinople, which (at least before the coming of gunpowder) could survive almost anything except internal treachery or subversion.

This may be unfair, but I think that when modern writers see 1453 as such a turning point, they are making a fundamental geographical error. They imagine that the Byzantines were the last force protecting some kind of Bosporus bottleneck, and when the city fell, that uncorked the bottle and allowed the Ottoman hordes to pour into Europe. That is nothing like the truth. As early as the 1360s, the Ottomans captured the cities of Adrianople and Philippopolis (Plovdiv) both of which in earlier centuries had been critical bases for Byzantine power in its European territories. In 1369, Adrianople became the new Ottoman capital, significantly located on the European side of the Straits: the Ottomans were already a rising European power. The Bulgarian lands were largely absorbed by 1382, and Serbia never recovered from the hideous slaughter at Kosovo in 1389. The Ottomans took the vital city of Thessaloniki in 1387. In 1394, the Ottoman sultan began a siege of Constantinople. Meanwhile, decades of brutal raiding, massacre, and slave-taking had already destroyed ancient Christian societies across much of Anatolia.

By 1373, the Byzantines became a client state of the Ottomans, subservient vassals, who held very little territory outside Constantinople itself. In 1390, the emperors of the time were forced to join their Ottoman overlords in conquering the city of Philadelphia, the last Christian holdout in the Anatolian peninsula, and a place with Christian origins dating back to the first century.

The Byzantines did stage a minor comeback in the fifteenth century, entirely because the Ottomans suffered a disastrous defeat at the hands of the invading forces of the Central Asian conqueror Timur. But the Ottomans soon regained their power, and (again) besieged Constantinople in 1422. By the 1440s, they had conquered most of south-eastern Europe, establishing Islamic rule over territories where it would remain substantially until the late nineteenth century.  As Philip Mansell describes Constantinople in that era,

the city’s population [fell] from a peak of 400,000 inhabitants to about 50,000 Greeks – or `Romans’, as they were still proud to call themselves. By 1400 it had shrunk to a collection of small towns, separated by farms and orchards. In 1453 the last Emperor, Constantine XI, ruled over no more than the city, a few islands and coastal districts and the Peloponnese. Commerce had passed into the hands of Venetians and Genoese. The classical statues had been sold or stolen. The lead on the roof of the imperial palace had been used to mint coins.

When Constantinople actually fell in 1453, there was very little left of the city itself. In its closing days, the empire could muster just seven thousand soldiers, two thousand of whom were Italian mercenaries.

Moreover, even that constrained Byzantine world did not wholly end in 1453: related offshoots and statelets continued in Greece and the Black Sea region until the last was snuffed out in 1475.

From the Ottoman point of view, 1453 was one landmark date of many that occurred in the process of empire building, between (say) 1302 and 1571.

It is reasonable to ask how, if at all, European or world history would have differed if the Ottomans had snuffed out that ghost empire in the 1370s, or 1394, or in 1422. (Actually, that is a real question, to which I will return in a later post). Symbolically, it would be nice to imagine a world in which the Byzantines held out a few decades longer than they did, so that the very last Roman emperor had survived to hear about Columbus’s ventures in the New World. But in practice, 1453 changed very little.

Many things are going on here. There is an obvious ideological component in our focus on 1453, as we so often portray history in terms of a neat clash between religions and civilizations. Moreover, particular states and societies are anxious to stake their claims to historical continuities. More generally, we have a natural tendency to seek convenient dates that we can use as markers, to use in the titles of books and college courses and television documentaries. When we have found those dates, we invest them with far more significance and finality than they actually had at the time. We don’t like to be reminded of the messy realities.

The story warns powerfully against over-stressing watershed dates or moments as “the end of empire,” a process that is usually far more prolonged and multi-faceted than such an approach would suggest.

 

The books referred to above are:

Michael Angold, The Fall Of Constantinople To The Ottomans: Context And Consequences (New York: Pearson, 2012)

Jonathan Harris, The End of Byzantium (Yale University Press, 2010)

Nicolae Iorga, Byzantium after Byzantium (originally published 1935: Portland: Center for Romanian Studies, 2000)

Philip Mansell, Constantinople: City of the World’s Desire, 1453-1924 (St. Martin’s, 1995)

Donald M. Nicol, The Last Centuries Of Byzantium, 1261-1453 2nd ed. (originally published 1972. Cambridge University Press, 1993)

You can also find my working bibliography on this topic here.

 

 

 

 

Philip Jenkins

Byzantine Empire

Fall of Constantinople

Ottoman Empire

Previous Post



April 19, 2023

The Tree Flag and Christian Nationalism

Next Post



April 21, 2023 Keep Hope Alive

Recent Comments

0 | Leave a Comment

"Life Force is a guilty pleasure of mine! Not a great film, but a fun ..."

philipjenkins


Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"I love horror but would have to acclimate back to Lovecraft and especially Machen. Have ..."

Terry


Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"Very good point about MacDonald.I am certainly a Machen fan!"

philipjenkins


Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."

"The Scottish author George MacDonald integrated fairy world into his fiction in a way that ..."

Terry


Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the ..."


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the Roman governor at the trial of Jesus?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Alexander Herod Caesar Pilate

Related posts from Anxious Bench

Family

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the Secret Commonwealth

Anxious Bench

Family

Hogg’s Justified Sinner: A Gothic Classic for Halloween

Anxious Bench

Family

James Hogg, Weird Wives, and Feminist Witches

Anxious Bench

Family

How an Explosive Book Rewrote the Study of...

Anxious Bench

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Emotion in Early Christianity by Andrew Crislip

Andrew Crislip’s Emotion in Early Christianity examines an often overlooked dimension of...

16 Spiritual Touchstones for a More Grounded Life

  After decades of spiritual study, here are 16 principles I try...

Catholic Evangelization: Sharing Your Faith Every Day

Welcome back to the Graceful Awakening mini-series called, “From Faith to Mission.” ...

The Pillar of the Boatmen: the Ancient Monument...

The Pillar of the Boatmen is a Romano-Gaulish sculpture that dates from...

Westminster Abbey-- Part One

In one sense walking into Westminster Abbey is like walking down the...

'Super Scam Me' Exposes AI Jon Bon Jovi...

Leslie Pickett believed she was in a relationship with Jon Bon Jovi....

view all Evangelical blogs

What Are Your Thoughts?leave a comment

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube