Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
History and Religion
Treating the Dead with Dignity and Honoring Your Fathers and Mothers

Treating the Dead with Dignity and Honoring Your Fathers and Mothers

Last updated on: November 15, 2022 at 8:53 am by Joey Cochran

Treating the Dead with Dignity and Honoring Your Fathers and Mothers 2022-11-15T08:53:08-04:00 Joey Cochran

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Last month, I enjoyed attending the Baylor Institute for the Study of Religion’s virtual conference, “Evangelicals on Their Past: Studies in the History of Evangelical Historiography,” organized by David Bebbington. The overarching research question Bebbington returned to regarded the legitimacy of confessional histories and their distinction from professional histories. As I mulled over the presentations, I, too, wondered about my perception of the making of the evangelical past. As the conference concluded, the ethical dimensions and implications of evangelical history occupied my mind. I drew two lessons from what I learned. Evangelical historians must meet the ethical demands of treating the dead with dignity and honoring their fathers and mothers.

Treating the Dead with Dignity and Honoring Fathers and Mothers

During the conference, one historian, Ian Clary, invoked George Marsden as an exemplar of professional evangelical history writing. Clary did so in an effort to honor one of his father’s of evangelical history. Clary recounted an oral history on the sticky situation Marsden found himself, when Iain Murray, a confessional historian, critiqued Marsden’s biography of Jonathan Edwards, published at the tricentenary of Edwards’s birth (Jonathan Edwards: A Life [Yale, 2003]). Murray, as an ideological heir to Edwards and defender of his heritage, did not care for how Marsden treated the dead, Jonathan Edwards.

Murray’s confrontation with Marsden must have troubled Marsden, who undoubtedly never wished for his work to be considered an affront to Edwards, his legacy, nor his heirs. Marsden’s self-perception of himself as a professional historian undoubtedly was that he had dignified the dead, Jonathan Edwards, with care and honor. I couldn’t help but notice Clary’s apparent conflicted dilemma as he recounted this dispute between two historians of Edwards. Here were two fathers of evangelical history, who Clary wished to give due honor. Yet, one contested with the other over how the dead ought to be treated.

This anecdote conveys two assertions on the ethics of constructing history. First, evangelical historians have a responsibility to honor their fathers and mothers in the historical tradition. Second, evangelical historians have a responsibility to dignify the dead. The first observation is indebted to the Reformed tradition of faith, especially the section of Thomas Watson’s Body of Divinity on The Ten Commandments. The second observation is indebted to Beth Barton Schweiger’s essay, “Knowledge and Love in History,” from Confessing History: Explorations in Christian Faith and the Historian’s Vocation (60–80).

Dignifying Dead Evangelicals When Constructing History

One of the fundamental questions evangelical historians must ask, when constructing evangelical history, is what would the dead, the subjects of our study, think or say about their evangelical role qua evangelicals? Are we honoring the dead? This might generate a whole series of questions that must be considered. Did the dead call themselves evangelicals during their lives? Could there be evangelicals before a self-conscious understanding of evangelicalism? Have we properly constructed the temporal, spatial, and ideological boundaries of evangelical history? Have evangelical historians included periods, people, and places that are beyond the bounds of evangelical history? Why might evangelical historians have constructed bounds too liberal or too constricted?

I have been wrestling with these questions because I am developing a spring course at Wheaton College on “The Rise of Evangelicalism,” which will use Noll’s first volume in the IVP series on evangelical history as a textbook. During the course, I will ask myself and my students these research questions as we explore Western European civilization from the sixteenth century through the Ante-Bellum era of the United States, with an eye especially to when, where, and who might be found at the headwaters of evangelical history. I intend to both honor Mark Noll as a predecessor in constructing evangelical history while also dignifying dead evangelicals, too.

Treating the Dead with Dignity in the African-American Christian Tradition

The anecdote concerning Murray versus Marsden and the confessional versus professional treatment of the dead struck me as being of great consequence as I’ve thought about developing my course on the rise of evangelicalism. You see, the past concerns and tensions between how a confessional and professional historian treated the dead can be carried over to present day corollary concerns and tensions about how the dead have been and ought to be treated in studies of race history. We should dignify the dead. To do so, we have to tread cautiously as we work with the past.

For instance, if I, as a white male evangelical historian, attempt to retrieve the past of African-American Christianity and portray its biblicism, it would be a valuable contribution to African-American Christian historical studies. But it would be overreaching for me to propose that African-American Christians, across the history of the United States, ought to be included within the story of the evangelical past because they meet the criterion of biblicism, an acceptable ideological marker of evangelicals.

Why should I tread cautiously here?

I should consider how present-day African-Americans perceive this revision of their past? Do black Christians or historians of black Christianity perceive their forerunners as black evangelicals? Has there ever been, is, or might there ever be such a construct as black evangelicalism? Might some take it as an affront to how their dead have been treated if white historians like myself reconstructed their history as a history of black evangelicalism? Might they perceive this history as being an ideological perpetuation of anglo imperial and colonial impulses? Might they feel that their dead have been forcibly displaced and enslaved into a paradigm not of their choosing?

As a white male historian, it would be presumptuous for me to speak on behalf of the heirs of African-American Christianities. I have to leave that task to other historians more fit to the task.

While Albert Raboteau’s research, from Slave Religion, masterfully conveyed how African-American’s employed the bible as they constructed their identity, Raboteau also analyzed the significance of death ways in the African tradition. In Slave Religion, Raboteau conveyed how Africans dignified the dead, honoring and remembering them with care, knowing that if they did not do so, the spirits of the dead might return to haunt them. This tradition was exported from Africa to the Caribbean and to the continental United States. Undoubtedly, African-American Christians today have a tacit remainder of that pre-Christian heritage to honor the dead, and they would be extremely concerned with how a white male evangelical historian like myself may inadvertently mistreat their dead. Needless to say, evangelical historians must prioritize the concern and consider the paragon weight of how the dead, their historical subjects, ought to be treated. Otherwise, they subject their work and legacy to tenuous footing.

Re-Visitation of the Dead, Jonathan Edwards, as Evangelical

One fascinating aspect for evangelical historians practicing evangelical history to consider is that the ethical demands of how they treat the dead has practical consequences, for evangelical historians believe the dead don’t stay dead. Our metaphysics indicate that evangelical historians will come face to face with their subjects one day, and they must give an account for how they have treated those subjects, how they have treated the dead.

Returning once again to the matter of Jonathan Edwards, the evangelical past, and how the dead ought to be treated—one day I might visit with the triumphal Jonathan Edwards in heaven. I should consider, does Edwards perceive himself as one of the founding heirs to the evangelical tradition? If I visit with him, might he gently push back, in rigorous and hearty dialogue, with points of clarification, for how he might differ from evangelical historians’ interpretations of him as an evangelical?

Evangelical historians have a pattern for casting the net, both confessionally and globally wide and liberal, as they set the bounds of the evangelical criterion of biblicism, in order to include the largest catch of fish possible into the evangelical family, and they long have included the prized catch, Jonathan Edwards, within the pool of evangelical biblicists. However, Edwards’s typological interpretation of Scripture does not meet the conventional evangelical biblicist criterion, as it has been understood and conveyed by writers of evangelical history. Surely, Edwards was a pre-critical biblicist. The finest among evangelical historians have argued so. But, simply put, Edwards was not a biblicist according to a modern, scientific, and deductive standard of plenary interpretation of the bible. In fact, if Charles Hodge is considered the measure of the standard for a first-order biblicist, then Edwards falls far short of the standard. Hodge, himself, trenchantly opposed the consequences of Edwards’s biblical and theological study. No doubt, other evangelical biblicists would find Edwards’s exegetical techniques and interpretations of scripture to be rather peculiar upon close examination.

Furthermore, perhaps Edwards’s atonement theory does not emphasize penal-substitution enough to meet the criterion expected of an evangelical by evangelical historians. Yes, he believed in a penal-substitution view of atonement, but he repeatedly argued throughout his works, in regards to his view of the atonement, that “to obey is better than sacrifice” (1 Sam. 15:22). In other words, he foregrounded the satisfaction view of the atonement—where the righteous obedience of Christ, from incarnation to exaltation—takes precedence over penal-substitution.

Thus, it would require some manipulation for a savvy historian to situate Jonathan Edwards as an evangelical, according to conventional, modern evangelical criteria. At least on two points of Bebbington’s quadrilateral would a historian have to perform reparative work to dexterously place Edwards within the bounds of ideological evangelicalism.

Dignifying the Dead and Honoring Elders: Universal Traditions in the Atlantic World

One of the profound gifts of historical work is that it is a science that continues the time-honored tradition of dignifying the dead. One of the disappointments of modernization has been the evolution of how the dead have been treated.

For generations, early modern Western Europeans treated the dying and the dead with care. They lived in a world under enchantment. As a person’s death neared, the community believed a contest took place between the forces of good and evil. The angels of Michael and demons of Lucifer contested over each soul. People engaged in a deathwatch to see how a soul maintained fidelity to Christ and resisted the devil, even to the end. After a person passed, heirs protected their legacy with remembrances. One may turn to Edwards’s publication of the The Life of David Brainerd to see how vital death ways featured in eighteenth century memoir. A full third of Brainerd’s biography recounted his decline and death.

The tradition of Western European death ways has universal parallels, which transcend the watery deeps that divide continents, peoples, and religious expressions. The Atlantic World has always concerned itself with how the dead ought to be treated. Universally, humans care about how the dead are treated and remembered.

My appeal is that evangelical historians should take stock and interrogate themselves, asking the question, how have we cared for the dead? Are they remembered as they ought to be remembered? Have some evangelical historians unwittingly made the dead instruments of their own ends? Have the dead simply furthered the aims of ideological commitments and conquests? Have some evangelical historians retained a tacit imperial and colonial mindset, inherited from Western European tradition and heritage, as they attempt to reconstruct a global and catholic evangelical Christendom?

Likewise, another aspect connected to honoring the dead, is honoring the living while they are still with us, especially giving due respect to elders in the community. This also is a universal principle perceived throughout the history and space of the Atlantic World. Whether in Africa, Latin America, Western Europe, or North America—humans have observed the time honored tradition of dignifying their elders. It’s only prudent for the young to do so. Junior historians, such as myself, have to constantly interrogate our own lives and ask ourselves, am I honoring my mother and fathers, who are evangelical historians.

These ethical appeals, to treat the dead as they would wish to be treated, to respect the wishes of their heirs, and to honor our fathers and mothers, does not set the bar too high, for those who are committed evangelicals and professional historians. It only expects us to live up to the excellent and exemplary standards, for which has set us apart, as evangelicals and professionals.

The Life of David Brainerd as Pattern

Once again, we might look to the dead, Jonathan Edwards, one last time for instruction. We might revisit his editorial work, The Life of David Brainerd, and ask: Is it a consequential example of how evangelicals have honored the dead well? Or, what if, this is one of our blind sides, where we repeatedly fall short of dignifying the dead properly?

Here we have a spiritual father attempting to honor a spiritual son with a panegyric. Historians have noted how Edwards bowdlerized Brainerd’s life when they compare Brainerd’s original journals to the edited publication. Edwards formed Brainerd into a more moderate, less enthusiastic, and less mystical evangelical than he was. Edwards intended Brainerd to be an exemplar for true religious affections and the devout Christian life. Edwards exalted Brainerd to vindicate his other revivalist writings, and he domesticated Brainerd’s New Light excesses to do so. This text set a tone for other New Lights to tame themselves, to reform their manners of revival. Samuel Buell and James Davenport, once radical New Lights, matured into moderate, respectable revivalists in the later third of the eighteenth century. They did so because moderate New Lights won a battle on the polite and socially acceptable mores for conducting revival. Edwards’s publication of The Life of David Brainerd shaped this image of a moderate New Light by setting Brainerd up as an exemplar of one.

Perhaps we might have to face the stark reality that The Life of David Brainerd signals a blind side of evangelicals, where we have an impulse to mishandle the dead. While well-intended aims motivated Edwards’s creative revisionist history, resulting in inspiring a global missions movement. In some way, Edwards set a pattern that gave evangelical historians permission to mistreat the dead and ignore the ethical demand to dignify them properly.

What a Person Thinks and Does with Jonathan Edwards

The trope that Jonathan Edwards fulfills in this essay is not lost on me. He is one of the first figures in history that those who love evangelicalism and identify as evangelicals wish to claim as evangelical. He is also one of the first figures that those who loathe evangelicalism wish to smash as they participate in the ideological iconoclasm of evangelicalism. While some say what a person thinks about Billy Graham is a good rule for defining whether that person has an affinity for evangelicalism, I am equally convinced that what a person thinks and does with Jonathan Edwards is an equally powerful tool for determining whether that person has an affinity for evangelicalism.

History and Religion

African American Religion

African American Religion

Previous Post

November 14, 2022

Evangelical Missionaries and Racial Imagination: A Brief Example

Next Post

November 16, 2022 Did Lydia Play a Role in Planting the Bithynian Church?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many days was Jesus in the tomb before His resurrection?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nine Forty Three Seven