Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
History and Religion
Can Pluralism Work in American Higher Education?

Can Pluralism Work in American Higher Education?

Last updated on: October 26, 2022 at 5:00 am by Andrea L. Turpin

Can Pluralism Work in American Higher Education? 2022-10-26T01:12:26-04:00 Andrea L. Turpin

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In 2005, I entered Notre Dame as a wide-eyed young PhD student to study the history of religion in American higher education. Notre Dame was at that time distinguished by having two scholars of such a specific topic: George Marsden had published The Soul of the American University: From Protestant Establishment to Established Nonbelief in 1994 and Jim Turner had published The Sacred and The Secular University (with Jon Roberts) in 2000. (Notre Dame also had an exceptional women’s and gender historian, Gail Bederman, who completed the trifecta that would allow me to study the intersection of religion and gender in American higher education.)

Sixteen years later, my dream of being part of the discussion has come true—and the questions have remained so relevant that Marsden released an updated version, The Soul of the American University Revisited: From Protestant to Postsecular (2021).

But when Marsden first published Soul twenty-eight years ago, I was a freshman in high school. Unbeknownst to my younger self, my subsequent high school and college years would be an extraordinarily productive decade of reexamining the history of religion’s role in American higher education. While a host of authors wrote book-length treatments of this subject, The Soul of the American University arguably made the biggest splash at the time and has had one of the largest ripple effects as well.

Soul articulated a historical explanation for the “secularization” of the academy—and in a postscript, a controversial program for creating a more robustly pluralistic modern academy in which religious viewpoints would have a seat at the table, but not control of the discussion. Marsden believed secularization had been a gain in many ways—it allowed for more participants in higher education, for example—but a loss in others. The loss he highlighted was that no consensus had emerged as to what would replace the ousted broad Protestantism as a moral underpinning for higher education.

Marsden focused on the effects of the tension between the religious origins of most American colleges and the understanding that colleges should serve the entire public, that is, students from a variety of faiths—if not always races, sexes, and class backgrounds, I would add. Navigating these two realities led higher educational leaders to insist that their theological position, and hence their educational institution, was what truly constituted being “nonsectarian,” which was the goal that fused religious purpose and public good in this style of thinking.

Marsden noted that this historical approach was not pluralism; it was more like imperialistic blandness, declaring your own approach sufficiently broad to cover every one. Anyone who disagreed was either overly narrow on one side or heretical on the other. And he blamed people from his own religious tradition—Reformed Protestantism—for pioneering this approach. In the mid-nineteenth century, broad-minded evangelical college leaders made this sort of nonsectarian argument against smaller denominational schools. Then, at the turn of the twentieth century, more liberal Christian scholars used it to take power from the evangelicals. Later in the twentieth century, secular scholars in turn used it against liberal Christians.

To piece together the story of what happened, Marsden sought his answers at the top, which is to say he gave pride of place to the religious and philosophical convictions of college and university administrators, who he believed had the power to set the trajectory of their institutions. He thus spent less time on factors like admission patterns or student life. Marsden also focused on the prestigious institutions at the top—the “usual suspects” in the history of American higher education, or what administrators now call “aspirational peers,” namely those institutions that set the parameters for what constituted prestige in American higher education.

To be fair, selectivity is necessary to tell a coherent story over a large span of time, and the book’s extensive chronological scope is one of its strengths. Still, this focus on famous, trend-setting institutions, particularly those that would become research universities, necessarily constrained the story he told. While Marsden paid some attention to issues of class and financial access to education, The Soul of the American University said very little about how the educational aspirations and increasing educational access of women and people of color fit into his narrative.

As should surprise no one familiar with my work, I advocate using both intellectual and social history to analyze the changing role of religion in American higher education—which is to say weaving race, class, or gender as a significant variable throughout the narrative. What I found by zeroing in on the factor of gender is that college and university leaders sought to enhance their institutions’ national reputation not merely by downplaying their denominational, or even broadly evangelical identity, but also by playing up how they contributed to the national good by educating men, women, or both for unique social contributions tied to the sex of the students the institution served. This shift opened up some doors for students but closed others.

So arguments about the nature of moral knowledge or the way to transmit morality to undergraduates did not take place in a disembodied void. It mattered who was doing the thinking and the learning at these institutions and who they did and did not envision as their conversation partners.

So I was delighted that Marsden decided to write an updated version and was intrigued to see how more recent scholarship on these sorts of questions would influence it. First of all, let’s get this on the table: I completely own up to running a search in the revised edition for references to my own work. They’re in there! Which is to say, Marsden did not only add new material at the end to bring the story up to the present; he also worked in subsequent scholarship to the way he told the narrative in earlier years. Which is quite impressive. (My research on the topic, for example, spans the 1830s through the 1920s.)

But my favorite chapter was one of the two new ones: “The Twenty-First-Century Postsecular University.” It reminded me of why I have always so appreciated Marsden’s work: it is written with such graciousness and precision. In this chapter, he grapples with the implications of contemporary pluralism, both its intellectual and social versions.

First, Marsden surveys the recent “crisis” literature on the state of American higher education. Now, as Marsden knows, literally every generation has been convinced that American higher education is in a state of crisis. That said, we all do well to pay attention to the nature of our current crisis, which I believe Marsden articulates well: “…universities are driven even more than ever by economic interests….[they] subordinate the humanities and concerns for what it means to be human” (351-352). The loss of a coherent religious framework to provide a common moral purpose was originally replaced by the humanities in the early twentieth century, but now, he notes, with the humanities receding it is replaced by a sole remaining moral commitment to diversity.

And here we have something I really appreciate about Marsden’s careful thought: he is not telling an unnuanced declension narrative. He specifies that this new moral framework is beneficial is some ways, just as it is harmful in others—exactly the same analysis he gave of previous evangelical and liberal Protestant and secular humanities-centered attempts to provide a unifying moral vision for American higher education.

The strength of a commitment to diversity is multifold. Even at institutions that are mostly concerned with setting students up for economic success, this commitment at least works to grant this opportunity to more people. Diversity as a framework also lends itself to the very sort of ideological pluralism that Marsden called for in the first edition of Soul, namely the opportunity for explicit faith perspectives to have a seat at the table of scholarly conversation. Plus, a commitment to ideological and social diversity is necessary for a modern democracy to succeed, so a worthy mindset in which to train students.

As someone who is also strongly committed to all these types of diversity in higher education, I likewise appreciated and was challenged by Marsden’s analysis of their potential pitfalls. In short, humans are naturally tribal creatures and if universities make the one moral value diversity without a concurrent attempt to provide some sort of unifying vision of the good, we are all rather likely to retreat into our subcultures and to perceive other groups distrustfully. Marsden therefore joins contemporary commentators calling for some modern version of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s beloved community.

He realizes the challenges: what is outside the pale? When ought a campus to exclude a student group or an intellectual perspective for being insufficiently tolerant and when is that itself intolerance? It’s actually not an easy question; all readers of this post would probably agree that some things ought to be excluded, but we would likely disagree on where the line is.

And do Christian colleges and universities have anything unique to add to this conversation or do they represent a retreat away from pluralism? Marsden’s other new chapter sparked some thoughts on these questions, so stay tuned for the second half of these reflections next month!

With permission, this post is adapted from my contribution to a roundtable on The Soul of the American University Revisited that will be published in a future issue of the journal Fides et Historia.

History and Religion

Education and Religion

Academia

American Religious History

The Soul of the American University

Previous Post

October 25, 2022

In Search of an Evangelical Political Theology

Next Post

October 27, 2022 The Great Vampire War of the Enlightenment

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which Christian group is known for its emphasis on health and diet?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Presbyterians Seventh-day Adventists Jehovah’s Witnesses Methodists