Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Heathens and and the History of Race-Making in the United States: A Conversation with Kathryn Gin Lum

Heathens and and the History of Race-Making in the United States: A Conversation with Kathryn Gin Lum

Last updated on: May 2, 2022 at 7:18 pm by Melissa Borja

Heathens and and the History of Race-Making in the United States: A Conversation with Kathryn Gin Lum 2022-05-02T19:18:56-04:00 Melissa Borja

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Scholars have long described the global ambitions of White Protestant American as rooted in a sense of exceptionalism animated by notions of racial and religious ascendancy. But as Stanford historian Kathryn Gin Lum argues, we cannot limit our attention to understanding how “a White American Christian superiority complex” has driven Americans to see themselves as set apart and called to be saviors of the world. We also need to understand how they viewed the people whom they endeavored to save and transform–in other words, the “heathens” of the world.

This topic is the subject of Gin Lum’s new book, Heathen: Religion and Race in American History, published by Harvard University Press later this month. In Heathen, Gin Lum builds on some of the ideas she presented in her first book, Damned Nation: Hell in America from the Revolution to Reconstruction (Oxford University Press), a history of ideas of damnation. This time, though, she focuses not on hell, but on the people believed to be destined for it. In so doing, she tells a much larger story about the durability of cultural categories, the meaning of history, and the emergence of ideas of about racial difference, which she sees as intertwined with religious difference. As Gin Lum persuasively and provocatively argues in this book, “racial othering has been a ‘heathen inheritance.'”

I had the good fortune of discussing Heathen with Gin Lum last month. The interview has been edited for clarity and length.

Frontispiece in John Cameron Lowrie, A Manual of Missions, or, Sketches of the Foreign Missions of the Presbyterian Church

Melissa Borja: What is the story behind your book?

Kathryn Gin Lum: There are really two stories behind the book, one academic and one personal. On the academic side, this book started back when I was a senior writing a thesis on missions in Gold Rush-era California. I was interested in Protestant missionaries and how they interacted with the Euro-American and the Chinese populations in California. I was especially interested in how they would sometimes refer to Chinese Christians as ‘heathen converts,’ and to Euro-Americans as ‘dead Christians’ when they acted in ways that Protestants did not consider to be ‘Christian.’ At the same time, I came across a mid-19th century missionary map of the world color-coded by religion, that showed the vast majority of the world as gray, for ‘heathen.’ This all got me to wonder: what does the figure of the ‘heathen’ entail? How can this category be so all-encompassing, and persist for some groups of people even after they convert? And what does this way of looking at the world tell us about the racial imagination of 19th-century white American Protestants?

I took a slight detour to the idea of hell for my first book, but really, that’s also related to this project because the heathen are understood to be damned if they don’t convert. If you look at a missionary map like this, what you’re really looking at is how much of the world white American Protestants believed were going to hell if they didn’t save them. The first book had more of a national focus and was more bounded in terms of time. In the second book, I try to take a much more sweeping view of the history of this concept of the heathen.

In terms of the personal story behind the book, I was raised in a conservative Christian denomination. I grew up thinking that there were heathens in the world and that it was my responsibility to help save them. And because I’m also Chinese American, I grew up wondering about my ancestors in China, about relatives that I never knew. I grew up worrying about them and wondering if they were going to hell.

I write in the book that childhood me could really be a primary source for historian me. And then I say that, actually, me right now could continue to be a primary source for historian me because I continue to think about these issues and about the faith-based implications of the questions that I ask from an academic perspective.

MB: Can you tell us what the main argument is of your book? I know it’s very complex. Walk us through some of the arguments.

KGL: So the central question I’m asking in the book is how the ‘heathen’ as a religious category of difference relates to racial othering. In George Fredrickson’s classic, Racism: A Short History, he writes about the ‘heathen’ as a religious category that is not yet racial, and the reason that he gives for this is because the heathen is thought to be changeable. The heathen can be converted out of heathenism. For Fredrickson, and for a number of other scholars, race has to incorporate an idea of innate, inherent difference, rooted in the body and not in belief. Race arises later, and it comes to replace religion as the primary way of differentiating between people. In the book, I call this the ‘replacement narrative.’

But what I try to argue is that the religious category of the heathen is not replaced by racial categories. The figure of the heathen continues to inform, and even underlie, race-making and racism in the U.S. There are, of course, many ways to think about race and racism. One way is as a socially constructed, hierarchical system of discrimination based on perceived differences between people that are understood to be inherent and unchangeable. That way aligns with Fredrickson’s view of race. But race doesn’t only operate in hierarchical gradations based on perceived phenotypical differences. It can also work in a kind of blunt binary: the binary us versus them, of white people versus everyone else. And here, I think, is where the category of the heathen–a broad umbrella that sweeps together so many different parts of the world–is still so powerful and still informs how white Americans look at the world.

It traces back to that missionary map again: Where do we get this way of viewing the world where people from vastly different areas and vastly different regions are lumped together under broad headings like the ‘Third World’ or ‘developing nations’? I argue that it comes from the idea of the ‘heathen world’ and this ongoing conception of the ‘heathen’ who needs help.

In making this argument, I am drawing from Sylvester Johnson’s book, African American Religions, 1500-2000: Colonialism, Democracy, and Freedom. Johnson writes about race as colonial governance, as the differentiation between the European and the non-European, between those who designate themselves as ‘governors’ and those they designate as the ‘governed.’ That’s really what’s at play in how I’m thinking about the ‘heathen’ as a religious and racial category. Designating people as ‘heathen’ implies that their lands and lives need to be changed, rooted as they are in supposedly ‘wrong’ belief. So I’m really trying to complicate what Fredrickson says about race, and to show how the quality of changeability is actually key to the way that racialization works in and as colonial governance.

MB: I’m really compelled by this description of how ideas about religion inform ideas about race. Could you give a good example to illustrate how those two categories are operating together?

KGL: Oh, there are so many examples. In the book I call heathenism a ‘get out of jail free’ ticket that’s used to rationalize all manner of atrocities in the name of saving the ‘heathen.’ It’s used as an excuse to justify enslavement. It’s used as an excuse for the creation of residential schools, and even today it’s been appallingly used to justify the hundreds of Indigenous childrens’ graves that have been found at those schools. It’s used as a reason to annex Hawai‘i. And you could say for all of these examples that, well, the ‘heathen’ ticket is just an excuse, and fundamentally all of these examples are about the desire for capital, labor, and land. Absolutely, that desire is central. But that doesn’t make the justifications unimportant. I don’t think that we can or should dismiss the significance of the ‘heathen’ ticket that is used again and again, to this day, to make greed look good. Of course, some–even many–people have believed that they really have been doing good in bringing ‘help’ to the ‘heathen,’ whatever the costs, but one of the things that I hope my book does is to encourage readers to look at the implications of such motivations.

MB: Yes. I think what’s so powerful about what you’re describing is how adaptable and useful the category has been to reproduce unequal relations of power.

KGL: Right.

MB: There are a lot of different ways that your book connects to the scholarship on religion, on empire, on race. Could you outline some of the main interventions that your book makes, both in the scholarship and in how the broader public thinks about religion and race and history?

KGL: I’ve spent a bit of time on religion and race already, so let me focus on history here, though of course they’re all related. One of the central things that made people ‘heathen’ was supposed to be their lack of historical development. Some so-called heathens were thought to be in the childhood of human history, so basically historyless. Others were thought to have stagnated; to have hit a kind of ‘heathen ceiling’ beyond which they could no longer develop until and unless they converted.

I argue in the book that the category of ‘heathen’ is really useful for Americans who are anxious about their own, very young, experimental nation. When they compare themselves to China, for instance, some worry arises since China seems so ancient, with such a long-lasting ‘civilization.’ But here’s the thing–if China has hit the ‘heathen ceiling,’ then Americans believe that it can’t develop any further until the entire nation is brought to Christianity. That’s because, as heathens, the Chinese are supposed to have misunderstood the nature of the land and their relationship to it. They worship ancestors and spirits in the land (‘feng shui superstitions,’ as white Americans liked to say), and so they don’t want to disturb the ancestors’ bones, carve the land up, put it to use. They’ll do that as laborers in America, but not in China.

By contrast, even if America is a much younger nation, Americans reassure themselves that they’re on a much steeper trajectory of development. White Americans in the nineteenth century pride themselves on developing all these machines to make the land productive, on charging forward through history, while ‘heathens’ are basically stuck in time because of their misguided beliefs.

This is the backdrop to the professionalization of history as a modern academic discipline in the United States. I recently learned that the American Historical Association was organized in 1884, two years after passage of the Chinese Exclusion Act. I think it’s no accident that assumptions about ‘authentic history’ drew from ideas then-circulating about progress-driven Christians in contrast to stagnating pagans.

And I think that they continue to inform the discipline. History is supposed to change over time. That’s what I was taught as a historian-in-training. But that’s a progress-driven way of thinking about history, and we need to also think about history as cyclical, as repetitive, as continuous. I worked through some of these ideas in an earlier article, and this book is my attempt to write a history that does what the article calls for. I try to show the repetitiveness of how the category of ‘heathen’ has been used, again and again, by the very people who think they are changing over time, charging forward through time.

Another intervention the book tries to make is at an ethical level of thinking about how Americans interact with and think about the world. This is a complicated history of people who are trying to do things that they think or claim are beneficial for others and in some cases really are or could be understood to be, like clean water initiatives. There’s all sorts of initiatives that grow out of the impulse to help other people. As an aside, there’s a little part of the book where I talk about the Silicon Valley and the tech impulse to save the world. Being in the Silicon Valley, I’m very steeped in techno-salvation language, and I see that also as a continuity of these 19th century discourses.

But for Americans to define themselves as helpers defines others as helpless/needy. It creates a binary that is both religious and racial, between an ever-changing, progressive ‘us,’ and a stagnant but changeable ‘them.’ So how does it shape how Americans think about themselves and their actions in the world to see how these kinds of discourses continue to this day?

MB: I wonder if you could give specific examples of how you’re seeing this heathen logic at work today–perhaps in this new cycle of tensions between the US and China, for example, or in relation to the relationship between the US and the rest of the world. How are you seeing ideas about the heathen deployed in our current moment, and what work is it doing in the current moment?

KGL: I started writing this book well before COVID, but I finished drafting it at the beginning of the pandemic, when it felt like both everything and nothing had changed. I ended up adding a postscript on COVID, which I first drafted in the spring of 2020, when Trump was trying to deflect all blame to China for COVID. In his language and in the media, I saw the same ideas that had been used to denigrate the Chinese as ‘heathen’ in the 19th century: ideas about unsanitary eating habits, weird beliefs, wet markets, ‘magic,’ all of which supposedly lead to disease and contagion.

But then at the same time, there was really interesting pushback against this narrative.

People have been able to use the category of the ‘heathen’ over time as a really powerful way to critique white Americans. Another metaphor that comes up in the book is the ‘heathen barometer,’ a way to detect ‘heathenish’ behaviors among white Americans and to call out white Americans for acting like the heathens they’re supposedly trying to save.

S. D. Ehrhart, Our “Civilized” Heathen (Library of Congress)

We don’t use the word ‘heathen’ anymore, for the most part, but we do use replacements for it, like ‘third world’ and ‘developing country.’ So, at the beginning of the pandemic, when the country just seemed to be completely failing at how to meet this challenge, people were comparing the United States to a third world country. Nurses and doctors were saying, ‘I cannot believe we are being forced to wear garbage bags because we don’t have enough PPE.’ Articles were coming out in the news on how America was turning to China for sanitizer and masks because we couldn’t produce them quickly enough. And I remember someone said on Twitter that ‘The United States is a Third World country in a Gucci belt.’ So this is an example of the heathen barometer in action, or I guess you could call it a ‘third world barometer,’ to say: you are not being who you claim you are or who you’re dressed up as. You are actually being who you claim you’re helping. But you’re the one who really needs help.

With the recent crisis in Ukraine, I’m seeing a lot of resonances there as well, particularly in how the media has covered the war and the kind of shock that they’ve expressed over war in Europe, in supposedly ‘civilized’ countries. The whole category of the ‘civilized’ country versus the countries where violence is expected traces back again to the binary, broad strokes, Christian versus ‘heathen’ dynamic.

MB: To sum up all of these things you’re discussing about heathenness: even though we don’t use the word heathen, that logic is still operating, but it goes by different names.

KGL: Yes. It’s in some ways so obvious once you see it. But the work that I’m trying to do is to tease out and understand how these heathen metaphors or logics–the umbrella, the get out of jail free ticket, the ceiling, the barometer–iterate and reiterate over time.

Books

Missionaries

race

Previous Post

April 28, 2022

The Curse of Capitals and the Theology of Punctuation

Next Post

May 3, 2022 What the End of Roe v. Wade Will Mean for Abortion Rates (part 1)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

On what mountain did God give the Ten Commandments?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mount Zion Mount Sinai Mount Moriah Mount Ararat