Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Walking on the Water

Walking on the Water

Last updated on: April 21, 2022 at 12:22 am by Philip Jenkins

Walking on the Water 2022-04-20T05:43:43-04:00 Philip Jenkins

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Over the past week, we have heard a great deal about Jesus’s Resurrection, open tombs, and Jerusalem gardens, and the same topics will dominate the lectionary readings and sermons for next Sunday. Here is another view of the story. I want to suggest that we actually possess an alternative version of the very earliest story of a Resurrection appearance, and we don’t have to go some fringe source or “Gnostic Gospel” to find it. It’s hidden in plain sight. And you already know the story very well indeed.

He Appeared to Peter

A while back, I posted on Jesus’s Resurrection appearance in John 21, where the disciples meet him at the Sea of Galilee. I argued that this scene, or something like it, was the very oldest version of a Resurrection appearance, and that by several decades it predated the familiar story of Jesus meeting Mary Magdalene in the garden. We miss this point because the present structure of the Fourth Gospel lets us read the Galilee story as a tacked-on later appearance, as an additional visit that Jesus pays to his faithful followers. To the contrary, I suggested that that is the original.

We can’t stress this enough: the earliest church believed that Jesus’s first Resurrection appearance was to Peter. That core fact gets progressively diminished in works written through the decades, as it is obscured by other stories and characters.

The oldest language is recalled in the formula in Luke (24.34), as “The Lord has risen and has appeared to Simon.” Note the early form of the name. More substantially, Paul’s celebrated passage in 1 Corinthians 15 is unquestionably the oldest and most authoritative statement of what the very first Christians believed, and as such, it deserves careful reading. Paul is certainly repeating a kind of credal statement, which he must have acquired in Jerusalem in the 30s:

that Christ died for our sins in accordance with the scriptures,

that he was buried,

that he was raised on the third day in accordance with the scriptures,

and that he appeared to Cephas [literally, “was seen by Cephas,” ophthe Kepha],

then to the twelve.

Then he appeared to more than five hundred brethren at one time, most of whom are still alive, though some have fallen asleep.

Then he appeared to James,

then to all the apostles. (vv.3-7, RSV)

The fact that Peter is here remembered as Cephas strongly suggests that this is a primitive statement, which likely originated in Aramaic. These are the pristine words of the pre-Gospel Jesus Movement – in fact, the pre-Paul movement. They cannot have been produced more than a few years after the crucifixion, and conceivably might have been composed just months after that event. This was still a church community that gave an exalted role to James.

Ivan Aivazovsky, “Walking on Water,” (1888) Public Domain image

Supporting that very early date, this proto-creed includes stories that were forgotten or dropped out of what became the literary tradition we have in the gospels, like the appearance to the five hundred, and to James. The absence of those once-critical Resurrection appearances from later accounts demands our close attention. Such historical amnesia offers a sobering insight on just how much of that primal tradition we have lost irrecoverably, and which might already have been lost before the end of the first century. Surely, we would think, those stories were not incidental to the larger narrative and belief system, but were rather fundamental to the whole structure. That is what the I Corinthians passage indicates.

Someone could write a fine book on just how, when, and why those later appearances dropped from the story, and the implications of those irretrievable absences for the making of the larger gospel tradition. Were the omissions conscious and deliberate, or did they reflect simple ignorance of that earliest historical tradition? What did the evangelists not know, and why did they not know it?

The Resurrection narrative known and recorded in the Jerusalem community of the 30s was unrecognizably different from the standard accounts we know from the canonical gospels, and which forms the basis of so many thousands of sermons in American churches this present Easter season. A chasm of historical memory separates us from that primitive community – the chasm probably being the catastrophic Jewish War of 66-73.

The Lake in Galilee

So where did Cephas do that “seeing”?

Note what this proto-creed says about the Resurrection. Jesus rose on the third day, he appeared to Peter, but there is no indication of the chronology of this “seeing.” We are not told the linkage between the rising and the “being seen,” or the gap separating those events. We are not told that this appearance occurred on the third day, or in Jerusalem, or any particular time or place.

Lots of miscellaneous evidence makes clear that the site was, or should have been, Galilee, not Jerusalem. We see a memory of this idea in Mark and Matthew, both of whom recall statements that once Jesus has risen, he will go ahead of the apostles into Galilee. There, he will presumably meet them for the first time in his new state (Mark 16.7; Matt.16.32). In Mark, the angelic figure tells the women to “tell his disciples and Peter, ‘He is going ahead of you into Galilee. There you will see him, just as he told you.” As the gospel texts stand presently, those Galilee references make no sense. They represent ghosts of an earlier stage in the story, one that no longer exists.

The Resurrection takes place in Jerusalem, the first appearance is in Galilee. As I have suggested, Mark’s gospel probably ended with a now-lost concluding scene that was very much like John 21. Whatever we make of that idea, there is no doubt that this particular scene in John 21 is presented as a post-Resurrection appearance. Others have suggested that the same incident might also be depicted in the Gospels in another setting, but where the story’s original context has become confused.

Walking on the Water: The Same Story Retold?

Rudolf Bultmann and others suggested that other early Resurrection appearances survive in the Gospels in the form of stories that are now associated with Jesus’ lifetime. Actually, that sort of confused reshuffling is all the more likely given what I said above about the forgotten parts of the earliest creeds. When the gospels were written, the writers had a lot of stories to deal with and didn’t exactly know what to do with some of them.

The Transfiguration (Mark 9) is the best known example of such a possible “displacement.” Here, though, I’m referring to the famous scene when Jesus is seen walking on the water (Mark 6: 47-51, Matt. 14.22-33, John 6.16-21), which is generally listed among the miracles Jesus performed during his lifetime. Plenty of scholars through history have noted the resemblances between this scene and the acknowledged post-Resurrection appearances, especially that in John 21. Just what is said to have happened is open to debate – a campfire on the beach, walking on the water – but the locale is the same.

Here are some obvious parallels:

*In both, the setting is the Sea of Galilee, and the disciples are aboard ship.

*Both stories give the time as early morning.

*When they see Jesus walking on the sea, the apostles think he is a ghost (phantasma: Mark 6.49, Matthew 14.26). This is an interesting choice of words. In Luke, the disciples meeting the Resurrected Christ think he is a ghost or spirit, pneuma, which Jesus disproves by eating some fish (Luke 24.37-42). However, some very early writers use other words in place of pneuma in this verse. Not much after 100 AD, Ignatius thought Jesus had denied being a “bodiless daimon,” but Tertullian a hundred years later thought that Jesus had denied being a phantasma. Phantasma is a common alternative reading, which also appears in some ancient gospel texts, especially in the Western tradition.

Put another way, Mark and Matthew say that the disciples initially thought that Jesus walking on water was a supernatural being, and used exactly the same word that was commonly used in one of his documented post-Resurrection appearances.

*The dialogue is very similar. Jesus tells them not to be afraid (me phobeisthe), “It’s me” (or “I am,” ego eimi). The same words for “Don’t be afraid” are used by the angel meeting the women at the tomb, and then by the Risen Jesus himself (Matt. 28.5, 10). The ego eimi phrase is usually characteristic of John, and it is often taken to suggest a claim to divine status.

*The Resurrection context is strongly apparent in Matthew. Matthew (alone) makes the parallel much stronger than Mark or John by stressing Peter’s central role. As in John 21, it is Peter who leaves the boat to meet Jesus.

*Matthew enhances the resemblances by describing the disciples’ reactions to the event, which far exceed the effect of any other miracle, even raising someone from the dead. They worshiped him (prosekunesan), saying “Truly, you are the Son of God.” This conclusion fits a Resurrection appearance far better than a mere miracle, even a spectacular one.

*If this is in fact a Resurrection appearance, that gives vastly added importance to Jesus’s words to Peter: “You of little faith,” he said, “why did you doubt?” Surely, the accusation is that Peter is doubting the Resurrection, not just Jesus’s skills on the rough waves. The verb that translates “doubt” is edistasas, from the verb distazo. That uncommon word occurs precisely once more in the whole New Testament, again in Matthew, and in the context of a Resurrection appearance. The disciples worship the risen Jesus in Galilee, but some were “doubtful” (edistasan: Matt 28.17). As in the walking on the water scene, what they are doubting is the fact of Resurrection.

Although the verbal parallels are not precise, Jesus’s reported words obviously recall a scene like his encounter with the Apostle Thomas in John 20, where the exact word used is apistos, unbelieving. But the message is the same. Doubting, disbelieving … the Greek words are different, but surely they reflect the same Aramaic original, from words attributed to Jesus at a very primitive stage of the Resurrection narrative.

I suggest, then, that an early version of the key Resurrection appearance has morphed into a miracle story, and is thus remembered by Mark, Matthew and John. Matthew stands out because either he recognized the tale’s original context, or else he knew a variant of it.

Either way, I repeat the conclusion of my earlier post: As we commemorate Easter, we should think at least as much of the Sea of Galilee as the Jerusalem garden. Whatever happened in that garden on Easter Day, no truly early source claimed that anyone actually saw or met the Risen Jesus there. However much we cherish it today, that version of the story would not evolve for several decades. The lovely story of Mary Magdalene meeting Jesus is unknown before the end of the first century.

Philip Jenkins

resurrection

Previous Post

April 20, 2022

Evangelicals Need More Military History (But of a Theologically Orthodox Kind)

Next Post

April 22, 2022 What Secular Liberal Historians Can Teach Conservative Christians about the Gospel

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims Piracy pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public Executions Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month November 2026 October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Hebrews teaches that the blood of bulls and goats can take away sins.

Select your answer to see how you score.

FALSE TRUE