After Ukraine: Apocalypse Quite Soon?

Last updated on: February 26, 2022 at 5:26 pm by Philip Jenkins

After Ukraine: Apocalypse Quite Soon? 2022-02-26T17:26:49-04:00 Philip Jenkins

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

If you were not terrified yesterday, you were not paying attention. Something very bad indeed happened, and you may not have grasped just why it was so frightening.

Vladimir Putin’s Russia invaded Ukraine, and that was a catastrophe in its own right. But that was only one part of the story, as Putin also said something chilling. He warned the West that “Whoever tries to impede us, let alone create threats for our country and its people, must know that the Russian response will be immediate and lead to the consequences you have never seen in history. All relevant decisions have been taken. I hope you hear me … No one should have any doubts that a direct attack on our country will lead to destruction and horrible consequences for any potential aggressor.” Translated, that is universally taken to mean that Putin would use nuclear weapons, because his country is so strong, and will use its maximum power against those who impede or threaten it. He believes that nuclear weapons are just another part of the country’s arsenal: Russia can fight a war with these weapons, and triumph.

Here is what is frightening. We finally, after almost eighty years living with nuclear weapons, have a leader in place who controls a large nuclear arsenal, who is extremely aggressive, who demonstrates every sign of shrieking paranoia, and who either does not know or understand what is arguably the world’s most important doctrine, that of MAD – Mutual Assured Destruction. This states that if you use a nuclear weapon against us, we will use one against you, and this process will escalate until both our societies are destroyed utterly, together with most of the planet. Nobody can win, because we’ll all be dead. In consequence, we will never attack you out of fear of MAD consequences. You will never attack us for the same reasons. And we lived happily ever after. Until yesterday.

MAD does not totally rule out the possibility of selective or local use of nukes, but it is all but impossible to imagine circumstances in which they could be used on the European battlefield without causing dreadful damage to a population center, which would invite retaliation in kind. Tit-for-tat then continues and escalates. With Europe ablaze, the missiles would then start turning towards the US and Soviet – sorry, I mean Russian – homelands, and things would go MAD quite quickly.

Let us assume that Ukraine is crushed, what happens next? This is the second part of the story. In December, Putin issued demands that were, by most evaluations, clinically deranged. They basically called for the West to accept the total reversal of the outcome of the Cold War, and something very like the re-establishment of the Warsaw Pact:

They include a demand that NATO remove any troops or weapons deployed to countries that entered the alliance after 1997, which would include much of eastern Europe, including Poland, the former Soviet countries of Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, and the Balkan countries. Russia has also demanded that NATO rule out further expansion, including the accession of Ukraine into the alliance, and that it does not hold drills without previous agreement from Russia in Ukraine, eastern Europe, in Caucasus countries such as Georgia or in Central Asia.

According to Putin’s world-view, the East European nations, all of them, already today pose a deadly threat to Russia by virtue of their NATO membership, and must immediately take steps to remove that danger or – or what? The Ukraine situation is now totally changed, but what happens to Poland or Lithuania? As we heard yesterday, anyone who “creates threats for our country” will be subject to military action, up to and including nuclear attack. And the timetable could be short. Most recently, Putin has portrayed the clear and present danger allegedly facing his country:

What next, what are we to expect? If history is any guide, we know that in 1940 and early 1941 the Soviet Union went to great lengths to prevent war or at least delay its outbreak. … The attempt to appease the aggressor ahead of the Great Patriotic War proved to be a mistake which came at a high cost for our people. … We will not make this mistake the second time. We have no right to do so.

So assume it is February 2023, and Putin is demanding the removal of all NATO forces from Poland, together with the surrender of any and all of that country’s advanced weapons and defensive systems. It must demilitarize and neutralize, or else. If Poland refuses, as it would, then what? Would Russia invade? At that point, we encounter the very important fact of Article V of the NATO Treaty, which says that an attack against one member must lead to intervention by all Treaty signatories, including the US. Does Putin not know that? Seriously? Or does he believe that US leadership is just too enfeebled and shambling to respond?

The US and NATO have no Treaty obligations to Ukraine, so the West can only watch its martyrdom in agony. (I assume we will be helping Ukrainian resisters build IEDs, but that’s just a token). In the case of Poland or Lithuania, the West would have no option but to intervene and thereby, apparently, to invite the process of escalating nuclear attacks that leads to MAD.

One other issue. After yesterday, any rational country in the region knows that in order to avoid Russian aggression, it either has to go nuclear very quickly, or else to join NATO, or both. Sweden and Finland will very probably seek to join the Alliance rapidly, but would their attempt to join be treated as a direct threat to Russian safety and survival? If Russia did strike at either country, would not NATO members be forced to intervene, regardless of Treaty obligations? MAD-ness awaits.

The world is a vastly more dangerous place than it was three days ago.

The only real hope lies in Russia finding some patriotic generals or commanders – or oligarchs, I don’t care which – who are likewise so terrified that they will take action immediately to remove this monstrous danger to peace.

As a final note, let me say that demographic factors mean that internal Ukrainian resistance is not likely to be too successful, even with all the aid that Western intelligence agencies can provide. During the Second World War, resistance movements drew heavily on the legions of teens and young adults that were so common in a high fertility society: they were braver and rasher than their elders, and like all young people, they knew that they were immortal. Today, Ukraine has one of the world’s very lowest fertility rates, and oldest populations, with a median age of 41. The young people who might have formed the backbone of resistance are conspicuous by their absence. Those older people might be dedicated and courageous, but it is a radically different picture from the Europe of 1942.

Philip Jenkins

nuclear weapons

Ukraine

Previous Post

February 24, 2022

Shifting Empires, and the Decline of Buddhism

Next Post

February 28, 2022 Climate Shocks and the Fate of Empires (and of World Religions)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which queen visited Solomon to test his wisdom?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Queen Jezebel Queen Esther Queen Vashti Queen of Sheba