Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Primal Religion? Indigenous? Traditional? What?

Primal Religion? Indigenous? Traditional? What?

Last updated on: January 3, 2022 at 12:17 am by Philip Jenkins

Primal Religion? Indigenous? Traditional? What? 2022-01-02T08:25:45-04:00 Philip Jenkins

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Across much of Africa, we encounter the familiar figure of the Nganga, a word that appears in many slightly differing guises. The Nganga is a spiritual healer, who draws on supernatural powers. No reasonable person would today apply the ugly term that Western colonialists used for such people, which was “witch-doctors.” But what exactly do we call the spiritual system that they represent? Going far beyond the specific instance of the nganga, this is actually a very difficult question, with major implications for North America, and even for global politics.

A reviewer recently criticized me for speaking of African primal religion, on the grounds that this made that system sound primitive, even infantile, and backward in evolutionary terms. Needless to say, I never intended any such thing, nor do the many other people who use or who have used that same “primal” terminology. But the criticism concerns me. I spend much of my professional life dealing with Africa and Africans, and specifically in challenging claims that “African religions” (especially Christianity) are in any sense a manifestation of backwardness. I desperately do not want to perpetrate any such stereotypes myself.

Creative Commons License

So what are the alternatives? In the bad old colonial days, it was “paganism,” or worse, so we cried out for a non-judgmental alternative. How about Traditional African Religion(s), which is what Wikipedia favors? That sounds excellent, but the term is exclusionary. If those religions are traditional, then of necessity, other faiths are not. That includes Christianity, which has been on African soil for over 1,900 years, and Islam, with at least 1,300. That Muslim figure represents forty-plus generations! Just how long does it take to build up a tradition? Think of the great Christian and Muslim kingdoms that prevailed in sections of the continent, and imagine telling the residents of those areas that their religion is not traditional, or indeed, not authentically African. Tell that to Christian Ethiopians, or a Muslim resident of Timbuktu.

Similar issues arise with the equally well-intentioned “African Indigenous Religion.” If what an nganga does is “indigenous,” then by the same token, what Christians and Muslims do is not, and that idea is just as unacceptable. However tempting the abbreviated term might be, we should not speak simply of “African Religion,” as that again suggests that neither Islam nor Christianity has really made its home on African soil. Maybe it will in another millennium or two.

That word “indigenous” needs unpacking. I quote Merriam-Webster: “Indigenous derives from the Latin noun indigena (meaning “native”), which was formed by combining Old Latin indu (meaning “in” or “within”) with the verb gignere (meaning “to beget”).” Roughly, it means “born here.” The other well known word for the concept is “native,” which comes from the Latin verb nasci. That’s all straightforward, but here is the problem. Native means “born here.” It says nothing whatever about how long your ancestors, or your ethnic group, have resided on this soil. As an immigrant, I am not myself a native-born American, but my children are, so please don’t tell them to go back where they came from. That would be Pennsylvania.

When you write about American history in the nineteenth century, you can produce some odd situations by talking about “Native Americans,” in the sense of “Indians,” while at the same time referring to “Nativists,” those xenophobic Anglo-Saxon derived Protestants, who hated Catholics and immigrants from Continental Europe. Their creed might have been loathsome, but they were dead right about their name: they were indeed native-born. In modern times, the word Nativist has been generously extended to residents of Northern and Central European stock, who don’t want to see more people of Latin inheritance. A generation or two on American soil creates new generations of Natives, and of Nativists.

So what do we properly call Native Americans or Canadians? “Indigenous” is commonly used, but as I have suggested, it has problems. By the meaning of the word, if you were born in the United States, you are indeed indigenous, even if your parents had arrived only recently.

The word “primal” (or indigenous, or Native) is deeply suspect if it suggests immemorial antiquity in a given area, that “we/they have always been here.” People move over time, often quite considerable distances, leaving ancient homelands and discovering new ones. The more evidence we get from genetics, the more clearly we understand those movements in fairly recent times, the past few centuries or couple of millennia, and those movements were generally accompanied by shifts in language and economic life. We are living through what has been fairly termed a “genomic ancient DNA revolution.” As peoples moved – whether in Japan, or Central Africa, or South Asia, or North America – their religions and spiritual outlook moved with them. That is a major and even inevitable theme in human history. It has sizable implications for the concept of being born “here,” of exactly where we are a Native of. It must also affect our idea of indigenous or primal religion.

In a sense, “Native Americans” represent a distinctive group, at least when set aside later arrivals from Europe or Africa. More accurately, those Native peoples make up an extraordinarily large and diverse palette of peoples, cultures, and traditions. That does not mean that particular groups have always been in the regions or territories in which they appear in the historical record. In the American southwest, for instance, Navajo and Apache people undoubtedly belong to those New World groupings, but they only settled in those southwestern territories in the fifteenth century or so, round about the time of Columbus’s arrival in the Caribbean. Those peoples, speaking Na-Dene or Athabascan languages, had over the previous centuries undertaken an epic and indeed heroic migration of at least 2,500 miles from the far north-west. (To put that in context, the distance from London to Moscow is around 1,800 miles). When those Na-Dene people arrived in Arizona and New Mexico, they rapidly formulated a spiritual geography based on special numinous places in the new sacred landscape they now encountered. The Navajo, famously, identified their four Sacred Mountains.

Around the world, “indigenous” peoples are very adept at reading such spiritual meanings into landscapes, and suggesting a vast antiquity for those traditions. Anyone interested in the history of the American West knows about the White settlers and miners pressing into the Black Hills which were sacred to the Lakota people, and the resulting conflict culminated in the Battle of the Little Big Horn. The Lakota had first encountered those Hills just three generations earlier, around 1765, at which point they proclaimed the sanctity of that landscape. The fact that a given people believe that that mountain over there is the hub of the universe or the primeval home of their ancestors does not mean that their predecessors thought the same thing even two or three centuries previously. Sacred landscapes can and do shift over time. To make that statement does not for a second impugn the authenticity of the religious system based upon those beliefs. Rather, it inspires real respect for the creativity of the believers, their openness to inspiration, and their willingness to adapt and experiment to changing situations and environments.

It is not just in modern times that migration is a driving force in the making and transformation of religions worldwide.

We should never think of those primal (or traditional, or indigenous, or pagan) religions as eternal and unchanging, or somehow situated outside history. Just like the literate faiths about which we inevitably have more evidence, those “Native” religions are likewise subject to new movements and transformations, which might arise as the result of traumatic change, in consequence perhaps of calamity or climate shock. Also in the south west, we can trace the religious changes among the ancestral Pueblo people that gave rise to the Katsina cult during what Europeans call the Later Middle Ages. Central to Pueblo ritual and cultural life is the kiva, an institution that can be traced back to the eighth century AD, and which has passed through several very different stages in an evolution of some 1,200 years to date.

Indigenous faiths are dynamic: they have their prophets, messiahs, spiritual entrepreneurs, and religious revolutionaries, quite apart from any possible influences from Judeo-Christian traditions. Meanwhile, tribal and ethnic groups spawn new offshoots, which acquire a powerful identity in their own right, and evolve their own set of customs and beliefs. To say these (or any) religions are “primal” absolutely does not mean they have the exact form in which they emerged countless millennia ago. Primal does not imply Primeval, and such religions and cultures do not provide a window into the Dawn of Time.

I turn again to Africa’s situation, and the vocabulary we employ. As new Christian churches in distinctly African garb proliferated during the twentieth century, scholars spoke of “African Indigenous Churches,” AICs. That distinguished them from colonial-derived churches such as Anglicans or Methodists or Catholics. But as those churches themselves rapidly became wholly African in leadership, and in worship style, the indigenous label seemed inappropriate: who are you calling non-indigenous? Also swiftly obsolete was the substitute term “African Independent Churches,” which suggested that other “mainstream” churches, like the African Anglicans, were anything but stubbornly independent in their own right. Then we tried “African Initiated Churches.” Today, many scholars using the phrase “AIC” don’t even bother to expand the acronym, just assuming that “You know it when you see it.” Born in Africa, and to faithful Christian parents, Desmond Tutu was surely both African and Indigenous.

These questions of definition might all sound like nit-picking, but in various parts of the world, they can be quite deadly. If one religion is Native or Indigenous, then by definition, others are not. The assumption is that indigenous creeds have a special and unrivaled authenticity in their land. Depending on the political context, that can provide an excuse to attack and persecute those “foreign” faiths, those invasive species of belief.

Two examples of that pernicious approach come to mind. By any reasonable standard, Japanese Shinto is an ancient “indigenous” religion, present in the land since time immemorial. In the 1930s and 1940s, a deadly and intolerant form of State Shinto became the official creed and religious justification for Japanese militarism and racial aggression. Other faiths could exist, provided they absolutely acknowledged the supremacy of that state creed. (In saying that, I mean no criticism whatever of the utterly tolerant and attractive Shinto faith or practice of today).

The other deadly example comes from contemporary India. Oddly as this may sound to foreigners, a case can be made that Hinduism is not a global faith on the lines of Islam or Buddhism, but an indigenous system, and indeed, “the world’s largest indigenous religion.” In recent times, that belief justifies the extreme intolerance of far Right Indian governments and their ultra-nationalist Hindutva creed. True Indians, in this view, are three H’s: they are Hindu, they speak Hindi, and they are Hindustani. The language requirement is bad news for the very large populations of the country’s prosperous southern regions, who speak neither Hindi nor any Indo-European language, but let that pass for now.

In this intolerant model, all true Indians are (or should be) Hindu, and any Indians who follow other faiths, such as Islam or Christianity, are the descendants of people who were seduced or forced into following those alien systems. By whatever means, those deviants must be persuaded or coerced to return to the true, native, indigenous, religion, which is Hinduism. The non-indigenous “deviants” affected might number as high as 250 million. The New York Times just did an outstanding piece on the persecution of India’s Christians, much of which occurs with the support or sympathy of members of the ruling BJP party, and government authorities. Muslims likewise suffer dreadfully.

Just a query: by many definitions, to speak of an indigenous or primal religion implies that it is pre-literate or oral. Did Hinduism lose that indigenous quality when it became so lavishly literate, and scholarly, so many centuries ago?

Definitions of religion, and of indigeneity, can offend and annoy, but they can also kill. Can I propose a rule that once a religion has been established in a particular country or territory for a generation or so, and people have been born into it, it is at once Native and traditional and indigenous to that land? To return to my African problem, I am going to continue using “primal” religion, but I think I will use quotes every time I do. With quotes, I might even use “traditional.”

There is a valuable book edited by Greg Johnson and Siv Ellen Kraft, Handbook of Indigenous Religion(s) (Brill Handbooks on Contemporary Religion, 2017). Every chapter is worth reading, but I especially point to the contribution by Bjørn Ola Tafjord, “Towards a Typology of Academic Uses of ‘Indigenous Religion(s)’, or Eight (or Nine) Language Games That Scholars Play with This Phrase.” See also Siv Ellen Kraft, Bjørn Ola Tafjord, Arkotong Longkumer, Gregory D. Alles, and Greg Johnson Indigenous Religion(s): Local Grounds, Global Networks (Routledge, 2020)

Previous Post

December 31, 2021

Happy New Year, and Enjoy Your Bath!

Next Post

January 4, 2022 Why Do Christians Read (and Write) Biographies?

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What was Isaiah's most famous prophecy about the Messiah's birth?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A king will rise in Nineveh A prophet like Moses A virgin will conceive A child will lead lions