Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Why Do Christians Read (and Write) Biographies?

Why Do Christians Read (and Write) Biographies?

Last updated on: January 4, 2022 at 2:15 am by Chris Gehrz

Why Do Christians Read (and Write) Biographies? 2022-01-03T20:17:09-04:00 Chris Gehrz

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“Why should we read — and write — biographies?”

It seemed like a good question to ask halfway through the adult class I taught last month at a Presbyterian church. I’d spent the first session summarizing key events and themes from my spiritual biography of Charles A. Lindbergh, so before we dug any deeper, I wanted to think more closely about the appeal and purposes of that genre of writing.

Biographies are generally popular with all sorts of readers. (My group mentioned reading about everyone from presidents and generals to composers and explorers.) But since I was talking with fellow followers of a Lord and Savior whose life story is told in four different ways in our scriptures, I particularly wondered how everyone thought Christians ought to approach biography.

The first response is the one I expected — the oldest and most enduringly popular reason for Christian biography: “To learn from the lives of spiritual heroes.”

This kind of biographical writing isn’t unique to Christians. Early in the second century CE, for example, Plutarch wrote about the Parallel Lives of great Greeks and Romans. While he aspired to “[purify] Fable, making her submit to reason and take on the semblance of History,” Plutarch did not aim at dispassionate empirical analysis so much as moral instruction.

But followers of Jesus soon found it helpful to tell the stories of saints. I’m no expert on hagiography, but since our message the previous week had mentioned the Council of Nicea, I noted Eusebius’ fanciful account of the Life of Constantine (in which that Roman emperor appeared before that gathering of bishops “like some heavenly messenger of God”) and how Athanasius not only argued for orthodox christology at Nicea but later made legendary the Life of Antony. Later monastic hagiographies helped foster the “cult of the saints” that bothered Protestants, but reformers both magisterial and radical wrote their own stories of spiritual heroes who stood faithful in the face of persecution.

Such writing grew unfashionable with the modernization of the historical discipline in the 19th and 20th centuries, but Christian historian Rick Kennedy has noted the recent revival of what he calls the New Hagiography,” in which “the author must try to analyze methodically while believing. Unthinking piety has to be avoided, but reasonable empathy, even responsible apology, is encouraged.” While “the academic credentials of each book are manifest,” wrote Kennedy in a 2015 article, pointing to works by historians like George Marsden, Grant Wacker, and Thomas Kidd, “the hope of Christian instruction in each of these books is palpable. The authors want their readers to imitate the Christian character of their subjects.”

Rick’s own religious biography of Cotton Mather stands in that line, and so too might Arlin Migliazzo’s account of Henrietta Mears, which was recognized last month in the Christianity Today Book Awards. I haven’t read Mother of Modern Evangelicalism yet, but it seems telling that the publisher’s description suggests that Migliazzo’s readers would find in his book “a religious leader worthy of emulation in today’s world….”

My own contribution to the same series is about as far from hagiography as you can get. The very first biographies of Charles Lindbergh presented him as a messianic or divine figure, worthy of emulation both as a modern who used technology to expand the definition of human possibility and as a Jazz Age embodiment of values as old-fashioned as modesty and chastity. But writing on the other side of the pilot’s middle-aged advocacy of white supremacy, anti-Semitism, and eugenics, biographers have left it to sculptors to depict a purely heroic Lindbergh.

In fact, it’s become clear to me that Lindbergh’s many faults have made an audience for a new biography smaller than I initially imagined. “Hard pass,” said one commenter when they saw an ad for my book on Facebook, “he was an anti-Semite.” Others are put off by the more recent revelation that Lindbergh secretly fathered seven children with three European mistresses in the 1950s and 1960s. The more conspiracy-minded even insist that Lindbergh masterminded his oldest son’s kidnapping and murder.

One interviewer wondered how I could possibly bear to spend so much time “with that big of a creep.” To which I wanted to ask, “Have you looked at my bookshelf?”

Being a Lindbergh biographer is only a side hustle, after all. I’m a historian of the 20th century, an age of total war, genocide, gulags, and other disasters inflicted by a few humans on the rest of the species. To the extent that there are any biographies on my office shelves, they’re most likely to feature the likes of Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, and Mao Zedong, all of whom are at least as creepy as Charles Lindbergh — and far more murderous.

My favorite of the bunch is Alan Bullock’s version of Plutarch: a one-volume telling of the parallel lives of Hitler and Stalin. According to a recent edition of Plutarch’s original, that ancient moralist was interested in exploring both virtue and vice. But there’s nothing remotely hagiographical about Bullock: call it hamartiography, a story of sin.

At least to some extent, that is the nature of my Lindbergh biography. A story of sin isn’t a particularly comfortable tale to tell, but I tried not to pull my punches when truthfulness required such blows. I didn’t linger on the dichotomy between the angelic, even virginal Lindbergh of 1927 and the scheming liar who thirty years later violated his marital vows to bed a woman in Munich (then her sister, and his private secretary). But I did suggest that the story of his bigamy underscored the secretive darkness cloaking most of Lindbergh’s life. And while I take Lindbergh’s daughter Reeve at her word that her father raised her after World War II to be tolerant and unbiased, his own lack of personal prejudice can’t obscure his sympathy for Hitler’s regime or his larger participation in the systemic evil of white supremacy.

Tellingly, no one in my adult Sunday School class suggested that the importance of hamartiography justified reading (and writing) biographies. It’s more pleasant to read of saints. Indeed, I tend to think that the “hard pass” non-readers who can barely tolerate the idea of a sinner’s story being published will inevitably take a U-turn back to hagiography — though their ideas of saintly lives may differ from those of Athanasius and John Foxe.

It’s precisely because I think Martin Luther was right that the sinner and saint share a single life that I’m not excited by either hagiography or hamartiography. I’m willing to use my writing to help readers hold up a mirror to their own virtues and vices — what Tracy McKenzie has called “moral reflection” — but I’m not really a moral philosopher. I’m a historian. And so I resonated most strongly with what one other student said in our opening conversation:

There’s an Eerdmans biography for that, too…

I read biographies because history can be too big.

For example, World War II is so vast and complicated. But I can at least start with a book about Dwight Eisenhower.

Likewise, I wanted to write a biography of Charles Lindbergh and others to read it primarily because it would help us understand histories: of my home state and European immigrants to it, including those who started to see themselves less as “Swedish American” and more as “members of the white race”; of eugenics and its religious advocates; of the debate over American intervention in a second world war; of the development of technology and its impact on humanity and its environment; of celebrity fueled by mass media; etc.

Most of all, I wanted to explore how religion and spirituality — though concerned with things eternal — are subject to change over time. I thought that telling the story of a great-grandchild of a Restorationist preacher rejecting both Christianity and atheism in order to chart his own path to belief in God might help believers like me understand our present and future as Christians inhabiting an increasingly post-Christian society.

Previous Post

January 3, 2022

Primal Religion? Indigenous? Traditional? What?

Next Post

January 5, 2022 (Two) Year in Review: Women, Baptists, and Science, Oh My!

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: James states that the tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE