Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Conservative Men and Women Together? Two Books on Evangelicals and Politics

Conservative Men and Women Together? Two Books on Evangelicals and Politics

Last updated on: January 6, 2021 at 6:00 am by Andrea L. Turpin

Conservative Men and Women Together? Two Books on Evangelicals and Politics 2021-01-06T04:25:13-04:00 Andrea L. Turpin

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I ended my Baylor graduate course last semester with a one-two punch of books on modern American evangelicals and politics. The first, Jesus and John Wayne: How White Evangelicals Corrupted a Faith and Fractured a Nation, by fellow Anxious Bench contributor Kristin Kobes Du Mez, traces the rise of a brash “militant” version of masculinity within large swaths of White American evangelicalism and its effect on evangelical political and social behavior. Specifically, it contributed to embracing combative foreign and domestic politics and to tolerating bullying and abuse within the church. The second, This is Our Message: Women’s Leadership in the New Christian Right, by Emily Suzanne Johnson, analyses how women within that same culture found their political voice.

I assigned the books in that order because I wanted to give women the last word. Doing so got me thinking: to what extent are the men and women of the evangelical political right on the same page?

Jesus and John Wayne lays out a pretty harrowing—and convincing—narrative of how twentieth-century White American evangelicals increasingly came to conceptualize masculinity in particularly militaristic terms. Indeed, its central argument is that for many evangelicals, Donald Trump’s poor character and abrasive personality is actually a feature, not a bug. Some evangelicals held their nose and voted for him because of his policies, such as his pro-life stance, but many others liked both his policies and his attitude. Thus, Robert Jeffress, pastor of First Baptist Dallas, declared that he wanted “the meanest, toughest, son-of-a-you-know-what” as president to defend conservative values (258). Jesus described himself as “gentle and humble” and urged his followers to turn the other cheek. But that simply would not do in an earthly protector.

Exactly how many evangelicals in the pew supported Trump for one reason versus the other is difficult to say (and one out of five did neither). Likewise, historian Tommy Kidd noted in Who is an Evangelical? The History of a Movement in Crisis that the lives and identities of many evangelicals revolve less around politics and more around their church and family life, evangelism, and charitable giving.

Regardless, Du Mez demonstrates how pervasive this unbiblical masculine ideal had become within American evangelicalism, largely through a shared popular subculture of books, conferences, TV, and film. A poll of my course’s students who grew up evangelical revealed that for some this cultural ideal had been so pervasive that they had never been exposed to any alternative. Others had worshipped in evangelical churches influenced, but not controlled by that ideal. In other words, everyone was touched by it; some could not escape it. Sobering stuff indeed.

Which raises the question of women’s role in all of this. Johnson argues that women played a significant role in the rise of the Religious Right and that, along the way, they simultaneously shored up and altered that movement’s conceptions of gender. Specifically, the book traces how politically conservative evangelical women moved from creating a cultural identity to overt political activism to running for office themselves through the public careers of author Marabel Morgan, activist Anita Bryant, author and activist Beverly LaHaye, televangelist Tammy Faye Bakker, and politicians Sarah Palin and Michele Bachmann. A wildly popular books like Morgan’s The Total Woman bound together conservative women around a common identity of “traditional” gender roles, but it also subtly altered the definition of wifely submission to involve greater initiative and choice. Women like Bryant and LaHaye (and Catholic Phyllis Schlafly) extended behavior considered womanly to political activism on behalf of issues believed to affect the family. Finally, women like Palin and Bachmann directly sought political office for the same ends (as had Schlafly, unsuccessfully).

If Du Mez has demonstrated that the Religious Right advocated an increasingly harsh machismo, how did politically active conservative women relate to this ideal? Some, of course, simply embraced it. (Du Mez noted several of these women, although her focus was on men.) Historians have long observed that men and women of a given race or class often share more priorities with one another than with people of the same sex outside that group. After all, most people live in mixed-sex households but fewer people live in mixed-race households, and households pretty much constitute a single social class by definition. All evangelicals (like most religious believers) attend mixed-sex churches, but fewer churches are meaningfully cross-race or cross-class.

Where Johnson shines is in noting that other women embraced this combative masculine ideal, but slightly softened it, like Morgan softened the common understanding of wifely submission. As Johnson notes—and sociologist James Ault similarly argued in Spirit and Flesh: Life in a Fundamentalist Baptist Church—some conservative women supported this version of masculinity because they came from broken homes and believed it to be the solution to securing men’s commitment to the family and community. But, as independent-minded women, how they understood it to work on the ground made space for significant female initiative.

The most dramatic case Johnson discusses of a woman forging a softened approach to conservative ideals is Tammy Faye Bakker, who retained a belief in the sinfulness of gay sex, but publicly argued for compassion for the gay community during the AIDS crisis rather than joining activists like Anita Baker in portraying that community as the enemy. In a different vein, other conservative women, like politicians Palin and Bachmann, adopted the “feminist” label for themselves, to the chagrin of more liberal feminists. After all, they clearly worked more than forty hours outside the home.

There are implications here both for women’s responsibility and for women’s opportunity. As fellow Anxious Bench blogger Beth Allison Barr once noted, if all the women of a church stopped supporting a particular approach to gender roles, that approach would have to change. Even if women do not themselves embody a particularly problematic masculine ideal prevalent in their community, they retain responsibility to help alter it.

They also have a particular opportunity to do so. Women and men of the same religion, race, class, or political persuasion share many of the same experiences and convictions. But not all of them. Women’s different life experiences open up a space for them to see more clearly some of the troubling aspects of the version of patriarchalism that has taken deep root within modern American evangelicalism.

A clear recent example is popular Southern Baptist Bible teacher Beth Moore. In 2016, many of the male leaders within her evangelical subculture excused Donald Trump’s “Access Hollywood” claims about committing sexual assault as “locker-room talk” that didn’t hold much significance compared to his policies. But, unlike them, Moore was a woman and an abuse survivor. Seeing the world from that position gave her a different perspective, one that galvanized her to say, in essence, “no, that is not OK.” Her denomination, the Southern Baptist Convention, now remains in the throes of a reckoning over its handling of accusations of sexual assault within its ranks. That reckoning has been led by vocal women such as Moore, Rachael Denhollander, and Karen Swallow Prior.

None of this excuses men from cleaning their own house. And several prominent evangelical men such as the Southern Baptist Convention’s Russell Moore have indeed both spoken against Trump’s character and held their denomination to account for its handling of sexual abuse. We are all responsible for our own beliefs and actions. Not only must women speak up; men must pay attention. When a big part of the problem is a warped understanding of masculinity, a big part of the solution will be listening to women.

Many women are speaking; many more could. For both evangelical women and men, change will require a willingness to sacrifice power and influence—personally and politically—on behalf of the true and the good.

American Religious History

Emily Suzanne Johnson

kristin du mez

Previous Post

January 5, 2021

Is My Biography of Charles Lindbergh Actually an Autobiography of Chris Gehrz?

Next Post

January 7, 2021 Jemar Tisby’s How to Fight Racism

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What food did God provide for Israel in the wilderness every morning?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Barley Manna Quail Olives