Generosity for Our Own Good

Last updated on: November 19, 2020 at 2:17 am by johnturner

Generosity for Our Own Good 2020-11-15T00:13:01-04:00 johnturner

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Today we welcome Abram Van Engen to the Anxious Bench. Van Engen is Associate Professor of English at Washington University in St. Louis and the author of Sympathetic Puritans and City on a Hill (see the Anxious Bench Q&A here). In today’s guest post, he reviews Alan Jacobs’s Breaking Bread with the Dead: A Reader’s Guide to a More Tranquil Mind. Seems that’s precisely what many of us need in 2020.

In 1931, the president of the American Historical Association, Carl Becker, declared that all people are historians. If history is “the memory of things said and done,” he said, then everyone does history every day. We turn to memory to find our way in the present and see our way to the future. “To be oriented in our little world of endeavor we must be prepared for what is coming to us,” Becker said. “And to be prepared for what is coming to us it is necessary, not only to recall certain past events, but to anticipate (note I do not say predict) the future.” What Becker wanted to emphasize was the continuity between the uses of personal memory (what everyone does) and the uses of cultural memory (what professional historians do). In both cases, memory serves a purpose. History is useful to us because, quite simply, it is constantly in use.

I have long loved Becker’s address because I think it lays bare the essential importance of history. But it also raises some lingering problems. What prevents us from doing bad history—from treating the past however we want, or seeking whatever we please and leaving the rest to rot? How, in short, does the past speak back?

These are some of the questions Alan Jacobs considers in Breaking Bread with the Dead. According to Jacobs, we all too often read all too narrowly: a common attitude sees “all history hitherto” as “at best a sewer of racism, sexism, homophobia, and general social injustice, at worst an abattoir which no reasonable person would even want to peek at.” He wrote Breaking Bread with the Dead to argue “for an account of the past that emphasizes its treasures more than its threats.”

At the same time, Jacobs recognizes the threats. Unlike some attempts to shore up old texts, Jacobs does not claim that we should leave ourselves or our moral judgments behind when we read. Instead, he argues that we are not bringing enough of ourselves to the judgments we make. The quick dismissals of past texts, Jacobs says, are acts of triage we make in an age overloaded with information. These days, we need shortcuts. We make quick decisions. We sort and set aside without fully weighing all we read. And in doing so, Jacobs says, we end up “highly selective in what elements of a historical person’s character we are willing to take seriously.” If we can call something sexist and be done with it, it saves a great deal of time.

This is where the title of Jacobs’ book does so much work. “Art is the chief means of breaking bread with the dead,” W.H. Auden once wrote. And that is the basic model Jacobs proposes: “sitting at table with our ancestors and learning to know them in their difference from, as well as their likeness to, us.”

A nice image, surely, but why should we bother?

Very slyly, Jacobs claims that this model offers us benefits we have not yet known. In becoming “uncharitable to our ancestors,” Jacobs argues, we mostly become uncharitable “to ourselves,” depriving ourselves of perspective, limiting what we can know and how we can grow. The problem, he claims, is that “we live thinly in our instant, and don’t know what we don’t know.” When we treat the past with a quick dismissal, we do harm too ourselves, not to the past itself. In the end, Jacobs argues, it is in our own self-interest to be much more generous—to condemn where condemnation is called for, yes, but at the same time to listen and learn, even perhaps from those we have in some circumstances condemned.

In asking us to look for both difference and likeness, Jacobs proposes that this model can help us achieve what he calls “personal density,” an ability to experience life beyond “just managing the moment.” The description Jacobs offers never fully comes clear, but it makes me think of a speech I have often taught. Every year, the University of Chicago greets its first-year students with an hour-long oration called “The Aims of Education.” In 2002, Andrew Abbot, a sociologist, was tapped to deliver the address. He began with a series of numbers that showed just how little it mattered what these students studied or how well they studied it at U of C. No matter what career they sought or how much money they hoped to earn, the fact of getting into U of C and graduating from it would do the trick. So why should they bother to study?

Abbott’s answer matches Jacobs’ almost exactly. Defining education as “the ability to make more and more complex, more and more profound and extensive, the meanings that we attach to events and phenomena,” Abbott called education an end unto itself, not a means to some other end. Then he offered this example: suppose you and I stand before a painting for five minutes, but you are an art historian and I am not. During those same five minutes, you will see and experience far more. “The experience becomes ‘bigger’ because you are educated,” Abbott explains. “Not merely in the sense that you can look at the painting longer without being bored, but also in that within a single look you will see more.” That’s how education works. Without extending time, the present expands. That, in a nutshell, seems to be what Jacobs has in mind.

I find Alan Jacobs largely persuasive, though I will admit that on this point I am easily persuaded. So I wonder what Jacobs would say to a harsher critic—to someone worried that most people are not good readers, and to re-read the racism, sexism, and other sins of the past is quite possibly to imbibe them, to find them satisfying, to replicate them in the present. That is why the threats, not the treasures, must be named. Such a fear fits with a general sense these days that words are power. They act on us and others. And to respect—or even just to read—the wrong words is do real harm, real violence, right now, either to ourselves or to someone else. On that point, I am curious how Jacobs would respond.

Whatever response he might offer, I am sure it would take a similar form. The argument in Breaking Bread with the Dead does not build on a series of bullet points. Instead, chapters meander thoughtfully through various books and examples. Instead of a legal brief, Jacobs offers us exactly what the book hopes to nurture: a meal. We sit down at table with a seasoned teacher, listening to what he has read and learned along the way. In that sense, the form of Jacobs’ book does as much as its content to back its point. We watch him breaking bread with the dead, and we begin to see why the feast is worth it.

Books

Guest Post

Historical Profession

Literature

abram van engen

Alan Jacobs

Previous Post

November 18, 2020

Is There a “Cosmopolitan Evangelicalism?”

Next Post

November 20, 2020 George Herbert, Little Gidding, and Virginia

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Cain killed his brother Abel because God rejected Cain's offering.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE