Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Why Evangelical Women Should Mourn the Loss of #RBG Too

Why Evangelical Women Should Mourn the Loss of #RBG Too

Last updated on: September 21, 2020 at 1:47 pm by Beth Allison Barr

Why Evangelical Women Should Mourn the Loss of #RBG Too 2020-09-21T13:47:14-04:00 Beth Allison Barr

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I missed the announcement of her death.

We had gone out for our first movie since the pandemic began in March. I was grumpy because I had wanted to eat out too, as the local (and I have to add historic) Hippodrome Theatre in Waco features dinner. I had been outvoted. Apparently I make really good pizza from scratch. Still, it was such a relief to get out of the house and do something together as a family. I purposefully left my phone at home.

So it wasn’t until later Friday evening that I realized what had happened. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the second woman appointed to the United States Supreme Court, had died from cancer complications. She had served on the Supreme Court for 27 years.

For many evangelical Christians, the loss of Ruth Bader Ginsburg creates a welcome opportunity: the chance to snag one more seat for a conservative judge on the Supreme Court before the November 2020 election. As Shuran Huang wrote for NPR, “Her death will inevitably set in motion what promises to be a nasty and tumultuous political battle over who will succeed her, and it thrusts the Supreme Court vacancy into the spotlight of the presidential campaign.” Indeed, many evangelicals claimed this was the premise undergirding their support for a man like Donald Trump in 2016–a man who “flouted every value” held “dear” by conservative evangelicals (see Kristin Kobes Du Mez for her evaluation of this claim).

Plus, Ruth Bader Ginsburg was pro-choice. She supported abortion rights. World Magazine (a conservative Christian publication) was quick to point this out. “Only the second woman to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, she shaped her legacy as a lawyer, then judge, as an advocate of women’s rights–which in her mind included no restrictions on government-funded abortion. She described herself as a ‘flaming feminist.'” Within the first three paragraphs of her article announcing Ginsburg’s death on Friday, World senior reporter Emily Belz described Ginsburg as liberal, feminist, a supporter of unrestricted abortion, a critic of Donald Trump, and a supporter of gay marriage. Belz then got to straight to the evangelical point: “With a Ginsburg replacement like 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Amy Coney Barrett, a 6-3 conservative majority would tilt the court’s balance of power. The court might have the votes to overturn Roe v. Wade, for example, and even overrule Chief Justice John Roberts’ moderating efforts on a number of issues.”

So Ginsburg’s loss–although certainly sad for her friends and family–is definitely an evangelical gain. Right? After all, what could the leader of the liberal faction of the Supreme Court, a “flaming feminist” in her own words, have done to help evangelical women like me?

Oh, so many things.

When I was born in 1975, Ruth Bader Ginsburg was already fighting to make my future better. While evangelical women, fearing what they would lose with the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment, rallied around Phyllis Schlafly as she championed a woman’s “right to be in the home as a wife and mother,” Ginsburg was methodically chipping away at legal barriers that hindered women’s equality. Relying on the 14th Amendment’s equal protection clause, ‘nor shall any state deny to any person the equal protection of the laws,’ Ginsburg filed brief after brief during the 1970s that reshaped how women were viewed by the law–as human rather than a special case. By the time Schlafly’s grassroots movement garnered enough support to defeat the ERA in 1982, Ginsburg had already laid the legal foundation to dismantle sex discrimination despite the ERA failure. As columnist Moria Donegan writes: Ginsburg’s legal “victories, coming down between the years 1971 and 1976, forced laws to change nationwide. It is impossible to overstate their impact. One moment, much of family, tax, and financial law was made of statutes that codified men as breadwinners and beneficiaries, women as dependents. Within just five years, all these laws were declared unconstitutional.” So, long before I even knew her name, Ruth Bader Ginsburg made it possible for my future self to own a credit card in my own name. She made it possible for my financial and employment status to stand as strong and independent as that of my father or husband.

When I accepted a tenure-track position in 2008 as a History professor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg was still working hard to insure that I really received equal pay alongside my male colleagues. In 1963, after joining the Rutgers Law School faculty, she discovered her pay was less than that of male faculty. She soon joined with other female faculty to campaign (successfully) for equal pay. 10 years later, in 1972, she founded the Women’s Rights Project with the American Civil Liberties Union. Her goal was to remove barriers and open doors for women in all areas of American life, including insuring equal pay for equal work. In 2007, just one year before I began as a tenure-track professor, Ginsburg wrote a landmark dissenting opinion in LedBetter vs. Goodyear. A female employee had sued Goodyear for years of pay discrimination, but lost the case due to a 180-day time limit for filing grievances. Ginsburg publicly called for Congress to fix what the Supreme Court had not, writing that pay discrimination often occurred in “small increments” over long periods of time and was many times “hidden in plain sight.” She equated pay disparity with a “hostile work environment” and called for employers to be held accountable for wage discrimination. Congress passed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act in 2009, hence forth allowing employees to file wage discrimination after each paycheck “rather than after the initial decision to pay a worker less.” In other words, Ginsburg gave teeth to equal pay for equal work–helping women’s contributions to the family income to be just as meaningful as men’s contributions. Since women make up nearly half the U.S. labor force, Ginsburg’s fight against pay disparity has made a significant difference in the lives of all women, including those like me who identify as evangelical.

When I became pregnant with my son (born 2004) and my daughter (born 2010), Ruth Bader Ginsburg had–again–already snowplowed my road. Although my employer did not yet offer consistent access to parental leave and I continued teaching in-person throughout the semesters I gave birth to my children (both C-sections), Ginsburg had at least insured that I could not lose my job for being pregnant. Yes, that really happened to women–even as late as the 1960s and 70s. Ginsburg herself resorted to wearing baggy clothing to hide the pregnancy of her son until after she signed her next-year teaching contract at Rutgers. But, after 1978, women no longer had to worry about pregnancy (at least from the legal standpoint) ending their careers. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act was passed as an amendment to Title VII. It was a direct result of Ginsburg’s efforts with the ACLU Women’s Rights Project and declared workplace pregnancy discrimination as “unlawful sex discrimination.”

Women who choose to stay home and raise their children can still do so–nothing bars their choice. Because of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, nothing bars my choice either–to do the work that God has called me to as a professor and historian while still raising a family with my husband.

Scholar, author, and Christian intellectual Dorothy L. Sayers gave an address in 1938. She argued “that a woman is just as much an ordinary human being as a man, with the same individual preferences, and with just as much right to the tastes and preferences of an individual. What is repugnant to every human being is to be reckoned always as a member of a class and not as an individual person.” The work of Ruth Bader Ginsburg has laid the legal groundwork to make Sayers argument more of a reality for American women. For women to be recognized as human just like men instead of always as different from men. “Women’s rights,” Ginsburg wrote, “are an essential part of the overall human rights agenda, trained on the equal dignity and ability to live in freedom all people should enjoy.” Because women are human first, even if their bodies and aspects of their lives differ from men, that does not justify women’s classification as legally distinct–of lesser value and with fewer rights–than men.

If these are not enough reasons for evangelical women to join me in mourning the loss of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, let me give you two more points to consider.

First, despite the attempts of World Magazine to define Ruth Bader Ginsburg primarily as liberal and opposite from traditional evangelical values, Ginsburg epitomized civil discourse. One of her closest friendships on the Supreme Court was with conservative Justice Antonin Scalia. I certainly would not have stood with all Ginsburg’s decisions, but I am certain that would not have made Ginsburg any less likely to stand with me against sex discrimination, nor even less likely to come to dinner with me had I ever had the chance to ask her. As she said about her relationship with Scalia, “If our friendship encourages others to appreciate that some very good people have ideas with which we disagree, and that, despite differences, people of goodwill can pull together for the well-being of the institutions we serve and our country, I will be overjoyed, as I am confident Justice Scalia would be.” Ginsburg could teach us so much about how to disagree with dignity and respect, if only we would listen.

Second, in an evangelical world that still denies women a place at the leadership table, that still allows discrimination on the basis of a woman’s sex, the legal career of Ruth Bader Ginsburg gives me hope. Ginsburg has proven beyond doubt that “Women belong in all places where decisions are being made.” For evangelicals who believe that women and men are both created in the image of God–indeed, that both sexes bear the image of God–I only hope that evangelicals come to the same realization as the Supreme Court: that women too belong on the bench with men. Not because the law requires it. But because evangelicals finally understand that the Gospel has always called us to it.

Thank you, Ruth Bader Ginsburg. You give me hope that our world, even my world of American evangelicalism, can be a better place for women.

Previous Post

September 18, 2020

Breaking Bread with the Dead and the Living

Next Post

September 22, 2020 RBG, Historian: Why Justice Requires Memory

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

I cleansed the temple in sixteen days and celebrated Passover so joyfully that we extended it another seven days. Who am I?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Asa Hezekiah Jehoshaphat Josiah