Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
A Christian and a Socialist

A Christian and a Socialist

Last updated on: August 25, 2020 at 2:14 am by Chris Gehrz

A Christian and a Socialist 2020-08-24T08:44:05-04:00 Chris Gehrz

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

He shows up in my spiritual biography of Charles Lindbergh, but I wish I knew more about a man who ran for president in the 1930s and 1940s. Not Franklin D. Roosevelt, but Norman Thomas, the Presbyterian pastor-turned-Socialist leader who lost to FDR four times—and to Herbert Hoover in 1928 and Harry Truman in 1948. He never received more than 2.2% of the popular vote (1932, when he was marked on more ballots than any American socialist not named Eugene Debs), but is a significant figure because of the unique intersection of his politics and his religion.

For if FDR could reasonably describe his political philosophy as that of “a Christian and a Democrat,” Norman Thomas was a Christian and a socialist.

Embed from Getty Images

The son of a Presbyterian minister, Thomas graduated from Princeton University and Union Theological Seminary and was himself ordained in 1911. Profoundly influenced by the Social Gospel, Thomas used his positions at East Harlem Presbyterian Church and a settlement house called the American Parish to minister to impoverished New Yorkers, many of them immigrants.

Unlike many other liberal Protestants, Thomas opposed American participation in World War I. “Not all conscientious objection is avowedly religious,” he insisted in August 1917, “nor is it confined to the relatively small sects which have incorporated it in their creeds.” But his own objection to war rested on a religious foundation:

The God of the religious conscientious objector, Jewish or Christian, is both stronger and more loving than the being recently discovered by H.G. Wells. He does not have to save Himself and His causes by using the devil’s means. Rather He waits for men to try His ways. We Christian conscientious objectors do not base our case on implicit obedience to one text even in that most revolutionary of documents, the Sermon on the Mount, but on the whole character and work of Jesus, who has conquered and is to conquer not by any might save Love and Truth. Churchmen nowadays say much of the “soldier’s Calvary” and “salvation through suffering.” If by sheer weight of agony the world is to be saved, long ago would salvation have come upon us. It is the spirit that counts, and the sublime sufferer on Calvary whose love and courage triumphed over shame and death did not receive His crown of martyrdom as an unfortunate incident in the attempt to kill as many of his enemies as possible.

His opposition to the war led Thomas to resign his pastorate and throw himself into the work of the pacifist Fellowship of Reconciliation. (About the same time, he also helped to found the American Civil Liberties Union.) But that debate also led him into the Socialist Party of America, running as its candidate first for offices in New York and then the presidency itself in 1928.

Four years later, he published a pamphlet explaining his political identity:

I am a Socialist because I believe that in Socialism, in this day and generation lies our best, indeed our only hope of plenty, peace and freedom. Or to put the matter negatively, I am a Socialist because I believe that in Socialism lies our only escape from a long cycle of poverty, dictatorship and war.

To his mind, neither major party offered a viable alternative. The “Tory” paradise of “the Coolidge epoch” was “a sorry place at best,” marked by “frantic gamblers’ prosperity” and mass exploitation. And while he thought of the New Deal as the most practical reform given “the limitations of the American political and economic situation,” it “brought no sense of permanence or security to masses of Americans who suffer all the pangs of poverty in the midst of potential abundance.” By leaving in place “the principle of production for profit,” Roosevelt did no more than replace “private capitalism by state capitalism.”

(“We have decided to call ourselves ‘The Doubting Thomases,’” explained supporters at Hunter College in 1928, alluding to their candidate’s religious background, “because we take with many grains of salt the promises of the two old parties.”)

Embed from Getty Images

Thomas’ version of socialism emphasized “social ownership of the principal means of production and distribution” and a collective decision to “not accept poverty in the midst of potential abundance.” But after initially supporting the Russian Revolution, he broke sharply with the Stalinist version of collectivization established in the Soviet Union, where “there is so little sign that the dictatorship is withering away. That dictatorship still imposes a rigid regimentation and at times prostitutes justice to terrorism… In this sort of justice lies neither security nor liberty for the new society.”

As importantly, Thomas’ socialism was bound up with his pacifism. “Modern wars arise out of the clash of nations for power and profit,” he wrote in 1932. “We cannot make peace secure or glorious under the loyalties of the institutions of capitalist-nationalism.” As the seeds for a second world war began to germinate in 1938, Thomas convinced the Socialist Party to found the Keep America Out of War Congress, then led it into an occasional partnership with the America First Committee in 1940-41, even though that group’s supporters included conservatives like Sears Roebuck chairman Robert Wood, Chicago Tribune publisher Robert McCormick, and Charles Lindbergh.

That alliance fell apart after Lindbergh, in a September 1941 speech in Des Moines, Iowa, blamed Jews for pushing a “pro-war policy” that was dangerous “both for us and for them.” “I honestly don’t think Lindbergh is an anti-Semite,” Thomas responded, “but I think he is a great idiot.” In the end, the socialist leader broke with fellow pacifists to support the campaign against Hitler—though he publicly criticized FDR’s decision to intern over a hundred thousand Japanese Americans, which he thought “approximates the totalitarian theory of justice practiced by the Nazis in their treatment of the Jews.”

Embed from Getty Images

So what role did Christianity play in shaping Thomas’ socialism? “Karl Marx Would Doubtless Call Him a Rank Heretic,” ran the headline in a 1932 Hartford Courant profile of Thomas. Though the candidate had formally resigned his ordination a year earlier, “he is still a minister, converting capitalists, and they parade to his lectures as though to a church.” Or as biographer Raymond Gregory puts it, the “social gospel movement still stirred Thomas’ soul.”

But Thomas himself generally deemphasized Christianity in his political rhetoric. “The progressive… knows that in no proper sense is religion an issue in this campaign,” he told supporters in Pennsylvania in 1928. “The great issue of Progressives still fall under the heads of plenty, peace and freedom. They have to do with our ability to make government our servant rather than the servant of special privilege.” Four years later, his pamphlet on socialism made no meaningful references to religion. “If a man’s Christianity makes him a Socialist, well and good,” he had written a year before, in an essay published as part of his book As I See It. “But let him remember it does not absolve him from an understanding of economic forces and programs in which non-Christians may unite with him. Let him prove the values [of] his Christianity… by his service in the Socialist movement, not by trying to substitute Mark for Marx.”

Indeed, it seems clear that Thomas himself drifted away from Christianity over time. In 2015 World magazine published an article by Western writer John R. Erickson, who (as a Harvard Divinity School student) had interviewed Thomas in 1967, the year before the activist’s death. Erickson concluded that Thomas had broken with the church as early as 1921, largely because of the theological problem of a God who would allow the mass suffering of the Great War and its aftermath. “I was very well satisfied with the kind of Christianity” he encountered in seminary and heard from the likes of Harry Emerson Fosdick, Thomas recalled, but he came to feel

that I could not accept what I had once very earnestly and warmly accepted—what I understood as the Christian identification of a God of power and a God of love. I had no desire to spread my doubts among other people. I regretted them very much. The doubts did not make me an atheist. They left me very puzzled, and the great desire of my life was a concept of God which could reconcile these two beliefs.

Norman Thomas “had lost his father’s faith,” concludes Gregory, “but beneath it all, he wished he had not.”

That interview with Erickson, according to World editor Marvin Olasky, demonstrated the fallacy of trying “to erect a hopeful ideology on a vague theology.” And during an election year in which “court evangelicals” like Franklin Graham and James Dobson are warning the faithful of the dangers of socialism, I suspect that some of you are hearing Thomas’ story as a cautionary tale.

Embed from Getty Images

But those of us who cling to Christian faith in the midst of theological paradox can still find helpful the “hopeful ideology” of a socialist like Norman Thomas.

First, Thomas challenges Christians to make their faith in Christ active in love of impoverished, exploited, and alienated neighbors. “The generalizations [of Christianity] are meaningless,” he wrote in As I See It, “unless worked out in a world where there is one justice for the rich and another for the poor, where gross inequalities of wealth and poverty have little relation to need or deed and none at all to brotherhood.” At a time when the stresses of COVID-19 are deepening economic inequalities already as severe as what Thomas criticized during the Great Depression, Christians should not accept rich man’s justice dressed up in religious generalizations.

But we will undoubtedly disagree about how best to work out our faith in the midst of injustice and inequality. So whether or not you share Thomas’ commitment to “social ownership,” let some of his earlier words convict you of the importance of respecting individual conscience and protecting civil liberties. In his 1917 apology for conscientious objection, Thomas made a larger argument for “the social value of heresy.” For the Christian church was strongest where it asserted “the responsibility of conscience to God” rather than the state, and the state could only remain democratic if it protected the rights of the minority: “The heretic may be very irritating, he may be decidedly wrong, but the attempt to choke heresy or dissent from the dominant opinion by coercing conscience is an incalculable danger to society.”

I’m not sure which challenge is more daunting at this point in American history. But even if he couldn’t resolve his central theological problem, a presidential candidate who never received even a million votes would urge us to reach for seemingly impossible goals. In its 1932 profile, the Hartford Courant understood that Norman Thomas “can be correctly classified as neither a preacher nor politician. Familiar phrases of both pulpit and soapbox are missing when this tall speaker addresses his audiences. He is rather a crusader—a leader of lost causes.”

Previous Post

August 24, 2020

In Praise of Church Ladies, Faithful Stewards of Our Democracy

Next Post

August 26, 2020 When Baptists Believed in the Bible—and Bourbon

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the high priest when Jesus was crucified?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Gamaliel Nicodemus Annas Caiaphas