Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
The Religious Left: A Reckoning and a Way Forward

The Religious Left: A Reckoning and a Way Forward

Last updated on: July 7, 2020 at 1:16 am by Chris Gehrz

The Religious Left: A Reckoning and a Way Forward 2020-07-06T20:24:12-04:00 Chris Gehrz

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Today we’re happy to welcome L. Benjamin Rolsky to The Anxious Bench*. A part time lecturer at Rutgers University in religion and an adjunct professor in history and anthropology at Monmouth University, Benji just published The Rise and Fall of the Religious Left: Politics, Television, and Popular Culture in the 1970 and Beyond with Columbia University Press. In today’s guest post, he responds to Jack Jenkins’ new book on the Religious Left,* American Prophets (HarperCollins, 2020 — previously reviewed here by Philip).

A Reckoning

Benji was recently interviewed about his book by Albert Mohler on the Thinking in Public podcast

From Standing Rock, North Dakota to the innermost circles of the Washington Beltway to the beginnings of a renewed American sanctuary movement to Catholic nuns riding buses, religion journalist Jack Jenkins introduces his readers to an eclectic collection of voices that as a whole make up the Religious Left.

Jenkins’ selection of “faith leaders” as chapter drivers, including pastor William Barber and former president Barack Obama (along with his faith engagement directors), speak to the movement’s diversity as well as to the book’s overarching structure. In addition to using such figures to shape his narrative, Jenkins also emphasizes certain themes through the actions of his chosen leaders of faith. These themes arguably serve as the most foundational concerns of the Religious Left in American public life today: health care, institutionalized racism, LGBTQ rights, the environment, and immigration just to name a few.

Broadly speaking, Jenkins’ text documents what he identifies as the “prophetic tradition of social justice” that is discernible within progressive movements of faith. With historical precedents dating back to the evangelical movements of the early 19th century and to the Social Gospel movement itself, the Religious Left makes use of an amorphous community structure in order to make change from the bottom up. “Far from being a historical relic,” Jenkins contends, “the Religious Left I have come to know exerts growing influence on modern Democratic politics — be it staging massive protests, leading legislative fights, training future candidates, or pressuring political leaders. The Religious Left is the beating heart of modern progressivism” (3). In identifying the networks of collaboration that make formations like the Religious Left possible, Jenkins ultimately hopes to show how the Religious Left is fundamentally different from the Religious Right by focusing on the intersections of protest, policy, and politics.

Perhaps most importantly, Jenkins’ encourages us to appreciate how important storytelling is to progressive modes of knowledge making and organization in the public square. As sociologist Arlie Hothschild reminds us, deep stories inform the politics of both conservative and liberal social actors in their attempts to understand one another amidst some of the worst forms of polarization ever experienced in American history. For progressives, the public square reflects their commitment to notions of the public good, fairness, and justice, Over time, marauders approach the square, looking to privatize it in the name of the free market and private enterprise.

From the vantage of 2020, those initially on the outside looking in, the conservatives in this story, seem to have transformed the once public square into a less regulated “public,” or counterpublic, in an attempt to undermine common sense assumptions about the government’s role in the everyday lives of the American people. In this sense, the once powerful New Deal state has been reduced down to a swamp in need of a better drainage system. For Jenkins, what progressive persons of faith have attempted to do to combat these less-than-desired developments in public life serves as reason enough to pursue the contemporary practices and historical examples of progressive moments of religious activism as the explicit work of American prophets.

For Jenkins, the Religious Left is categorically different from the Religious Right because of how it organizes itself. “Instead of standing alone as an isolated voting bloc, a la the Religious Right,” Jenkins explains, “the vast and complex faith-rooted organizing apparatus [William] Barber helped create often functions as a particularly vocal element within broader progressive campaigns- a sort of coalitions among coalitions” (74). Not only does this formation allow for a more decentralized form of organizing, it also makes possible broad cooperation not only with similarly interfaith Christian groups, but also with organizations and individuals connected to different religions entirely, including Sikhism, Judaism, and Islam.

The paradigmatic example of Religious Left activism in American Prophets takes place in the name of the stranger and spaces of sanctuary. Along with chapters on environmental justice and the Black Lives Matter movement, Jenkins’ text explores what he calls the “new sanctuary movement” of the twenty-first century in order to illuminate the ways in which religious commitments inform progressive politics-making on behalf of the potentially displaced. “To understand the New Sanctuary movement is to understand how the Religious Left builds power through a mixture of moral arguments, liberation theology, and the art of protest,” contends Jenkins. “The secret to the scalability of the New Sanctuary movement lies in its appeal to the poetry of protest—the telling of a moral story through the medium of direct action” (128).

There is perhaps no better description of what could be described as a liberal religious method of social change than the one used to mobilize on behalf of the undocumented. “Think of it as a sonnet with interchangeable verses but always the same refrain,” explains Jenkins:

Organizers first orchestrate a demonstration to dramatize a larger moral quandary in a way that attracts media attention, usually through direct confrontation with authorities. The media attention, in turn, encourages the masses to sympathize with the protesters, draws more people to the cause, and—ideally—results in social or legislative change. It’s an art form embraced by many throughout American history, but especially religious activists who preach moral arguments for a living. Hence its adoption by Martin Luther King Jr., who appealed to roughly the same logic when explaining the 1965 confrontation between Civil Rights marchers and Alabama state troopers on the Edmund Pettus Bridge. He said the demonstration was meant to ‘dramatize the existence of injustice and to bring about the presence of justice by methods of nonviolence’ using methods that must demand the attention of the press, for it is the press which interprets the issue to the community at large and thereby sets in motion the machinery for change.

Jenkins’ prose is as elegant as it is efficient, but the process itself seems to be deceptively straightforward. First, identify an issue or concern worthy of generating “awareness.” Second, attract the attention of “the press” in order to bring attention to an issue’s importance in American public life. Third, generate sympathy for the social issue in question based on the public’s largely uniform understanding of the issue’s symbolic and thus social significance. And fourth, set in motion legislative change in favor of the press’s chosen subject of amplification due largely to its own ability to “set in motion the machinery for change” (128).

Jenkins’ description is a much welcomed one in the literature on the Religious Left in light of the largely inchoate nature of liberal progressive organizing. It also helps illustrate a somewhat naive set of assumptions about social change and its perception that continue to negatively impact progressive movements for social justice today. First, who or what are “the press” in 2020? Journalists? Newspapers? Almost as important is the assumption that the press will generate the outcome desired: namely, that the viewing public (or “the masses,” an important distinction in these times) will be first sympathetic and then empathetic towards those deserving of such attention in the first place

Not unlike satire, this particular mode of communication depends upon a willing audience to go along and largely agree with the assumptions undergirding the significance of a given social issue. In other words, the civic efficacy of the technique described by Jenkins above depends largely upon an almost uniform understanding of what’s displayed and commented on by the press. In light of the atomization of the media landscape, such an aspiration, not necessarily shared by the author, arguably comes off as naive at best and possibly dangerous at worst.

A Way Forward: 2020

The question of the day, it seems, is not whether progressive people of faith exist and make constructive contributions to the public good, but whether “the Religious Left” itself exists. Jenkins answers this question in the affirmative; as do I. The real question, then, is this: what do those progressive persons of faith, or no faith, expect from their Religious Left? In particular, what do they expect from it politically? And can it ultimately deliver on any of its prophetic aspirations?

Put another way: does the kingdom of God still unfold on earth if no one knows that it’s happening?

Jenkins does a wonderful job addressing this assumed lack of notoriety in the public eye when compared to progressives’ more conservative counterparts in Christ: “the Religious Right.” Unfortunately, such publicity in the form of a well received book can only do so much to address the fundamental flaw in progressive organizing itself: the willful attempts to remain “illegible” to the state, and thus to the public at large, in such instances of organizing. While this decision may be one borne out of principle, as it is for the organization Sojourners, it does very little to help the cause of progressives in the fight over the soul of the country.

One of the fundamental challenges facing progressive activism today is the degree to which it still overly depends on the symbolic to accomplish strictly political ends in the public square. Explicitly progressive organizations like Sojourners often assume that their prophetic message on the social issue of the day will be understood according to their particular hermeneutic. As I’ve argued elsewhere, even when defending the undocumented in the name of the prophetic text, progressives ultimately leave the message up to the people to be interpreted. On top of this, symbols and the symbolic often accompany such acts of protest and moral outrage, which then are disseminated by the latest sympathetic media source to its respective audiences.

Not surprisingly, interpretations can vary a great deal — even over seemingly the most universal of truths. “Sojourners do not always take care to provide a biblical ‘code’ for social analysis, naming and elaborating specific biblical principles, nor do they generally establish why the biblical is a self-evidently desirable alternative to conventional models,” argues scholar of religion Jason Bivins. “Rather, we are simply left to conclude that ‘moral values’ and ‘social conscience’ are clear in their meanings and that these meanings are politically unconventional” (71). This is not to say that the symbolic is dead on proverbial arrival. What it does say is that progressives have to do a better job of educating the public about why in particular their biblically-based positions are preferable over others. This is especially the case when conservative activists have succeeded in defining the migrant as a rapist, drug dealer, and overall “bad hombre.”

In other words, progressive activists of faith have to establish a better baseline for measuring “success” or “progress” beyond simply cultural registers of human experience. What good is it to win over hearts and minds if legislation gets passed that curtails such spiritual aspirations and desires in public? In addressing the question of “Does the United States Need a Religious Left?”, research fellow Nadia Marzouki observes that progressive activism relies on a much longer temporal arc to adjudicate change in a qualitative fashion: “Their strategy is not oriented toward seizing political power; they do not evaluate a successful action according to its immediate results, such as the outcome of an election or a policy change, but on a much longer timeframe.”

If this is indeed the case, then the question for progressives moving forward is to what extent they can develop the appropriate metrics for evaluating social change beyond simply being supportive of “social change.”

Conclusion

For many, we’re living a surreal age of upheaval: one that is familiar to some, but not necessarily to others. The moral authority that once came with persons of faith marching in public on behalf of the voiceless has largely lost its luster. This was not the case in the 1960s — especially for those on the ground on behalf of the movement.

From the outside, such activism and performance were understood largely for what they were: prophetic moments of racial reconciliation. Few TV cameras were around, and those that were focused their attention on fire hoses and police dogs. In 2020, this reception process has become that much more subject to the cacophony that is social media and the silos of knowledge that it tends to produce: the swirl as Bivins will argue in a forthcoming monograph on embattlement and victimization discourses in American public life. No one may like photos ops, especially when they use the biblical text as a glorified prop, but they definitely control a message within an otherwise chaotic media ecosystem that has redefined twenty-four hour news as instantaneous news. Finding traction for the prophetic is hard enough; set against this backdrop, it’s even harder to imagine it being heard at all. Jenkins’ in-depth reporting in American Prophets helps us both identify and appreciate the rich spiritual tapestry that is American religious liberalism in American public life.

For further reading… Among the many other studies of the Religious Left, Benji recommends Leilah Danielson, Marian Mollin, and Douglas Rossinow, eds., The Religious Left in Modern America: Doorkeepers of Radical Faith (Palgrave, 2018) and Rebecca T. Alpert, ed., Voices of the Religious Left: A Contemporary Sourcebook (Temple University Press, 2000).

Previous Post

July 6, 2020

Of Whittier and Black Lives

Next Post

July 8, 2020 Because It is Time To Include Black Women's Voices Too: Revised Disrupting Christian Patriarchy Reading List

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who said, "If anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

James Paul Peter John