Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Melville’s CLAREL and the Crisis of American Faith

Melville’s CLAREL and the Crisis of American Faith

Last updated on: June 26, 2020 at 6:28 am by Philip Jenkins

Melville’s CLAREL and the Crisis of American Faith 2020-06-26T06:28:46-04:00 Philip Jenkins

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I have been posting about how American poetry can serve as a rich primary source for historians, and especially for those approaching religious themes. Exhibit A in this story is Herman Melville’s 1876 epic Clarel, which is extraordinarily useful for anyone interested in the spectrum of American religion in the nineteenth century. For reasons I will explain, this blogpost is a sadly inadequate introduction to the work, or rather, an encouragement to go make your own discoveries. I hope this is a fair assumption, but I believe that few historians will actually have read Clarel, unless they are specialists in the American literature of the period.

At first description, Clarel seems too good to be true. It grew out of Melville’s visit/pilgrimage to Palestine in 1857, and it reflects the range of people and ideas that he encountered. The result is a dazzling story of different sects and faiths meeting in the context of the Holy Land, which among other things tackles Jewish-Christian interactions intelligently and knowledgeably. Clarel is easily accessible online. and you can find a really useful guide to the work.

As the characters travel to various places, their conversations offer insights into what educated people thought about the Bible and critical approaches to it at that era, the Higher Criticism. The poem cites the books of David Friedrich Strauss and Ernest Renan. Throughout, the poem addresses faith and its challenges, at a level scarcely tackled in subsequent literature, and it really is one of the most important religious explorations in the whole American tradition. In the US context, it is doubly striking that it appeared as early as 1876.

Image is in public domain

The problem is that the whole of Clarel is immense to the point of overwhelming, running to 18,000 lines (lines, not words), in 150 cantos. That makes it much longer than (say) Milton’s Paradise Lost. The verse also offers a stumbling block for modern readers, who are much more comfortable with prose, and with the novel as a form. It was by no means an easy task for Melville himself. As his wife complained,

If ever this dreadful incubus of a book (I call it so because it has undermined all our happiness) gets off Herman’s shoulders I do hope he may be in better mental health―but at present I have reason to feel the gravest concern & anxiety about it―to put it in mild phrase.

Let me say right away that the quality of the poetry is open to debate. I quote from a brutal recent review by Colin Burrow in the London Review of Books (paywalled):

To give Clarel its due, it is a work of huge ambition, which tries to explore the nature of varying shades of Christianity and other faiths in depth and detail. But it is also, sadly, an outright, relentless, irredeemable stinker of a poem. Its tetrameters feel like tourniquets to thought, making its veins stand out and its circulation fail … Oodles of Miltonic exoticism … aren’t enough to give it intellectual colour.

That is on the harsh side, but the basic point is fair.

For multiple reasons, Clarel had a limited impact on its first appearance and was not rediscovered until the 1920s, and only in quite recent times has it been acknowledged as an essential part of the Melville canon. Still, that meant “essential” for literary scholars, rather than for historians. We can only imagine how it might be read today if it had been constructed as a novel, which it easily could have been – it has all the familiar features that we would expect, in terms of characters, plot, dialogue, and so on.

Please take the following as a very crude sketch of the work, and a hint of what nuggets it offers.

In short summary, Clarel represents what a smart and highly educated American saw when he looked around at the religious scene in his country at the time. The hero, Clarel the theology student, is the prime observer, based on Melville’s younger self. He encounters various other characters, and serves as a conduit for their exchanges and arguments. Nehemiah is a fervent Rhode Island evangelical, what would later be called a fundamentalist, filled with fiery zeal to convert the Jews, and bring in the End Times. Vine is a more educated and thoughtful observer (likely based on Nathaniel Hawthorne).

Rolfe is a harsher skeptic, who mocks attempts to find reliable truths at a time when scholars and scientists are demythologizing everything, even the moon and stars. The moon is no goddess, but an ill-formed rock floating in space. So why should the Bible be exempt from the debunking critiques already applied to Roman history by incisive scholars like Barthold Georg Niebuhr?

That stable proof which man would fold, ⁠
How may it be derived from things
Subject to change and vanishings?
But let that pass. All now’s revised:
Zion, like Rome, is Niebuhrized.
Yes, doubt attends. Doubt’s heavy hand ⁠
Is set against us; and his brand
Still warreth for his natural lord–
King Common-Place–whose rule abhorred
Yearly extends in vulgar sway,
Absorbs Atlantis and Cathay; ⁠
Ay, reaches toward Diana’s moon,
Affirming it a clinkered blot,
Deriding pale Endymion.

…
Then tell, tell then, what charm may save
Thy marvel, Palestine, from grave
Whereto winds many a bier and pall
Of old Illusion? What for earth? ⁠(I.34)

Zion, like Rome, is Niebuhrized. Why should Christ’s reported words in Jerusalem be treated as any less mythical than anything reported in the ancient legends of Troy? (I.33) These were all troubling questions for Americans with the slightest acquaintance with contemporary European, and particularly German scholarship. Geological themes also recur, and the idea that the planet’s extreme antiquity made it impossible to accept the literal Creation account in Genesis (II.19).

Just how extensive the intellectual revolutions of that era were is hard to overstate. A famous passage in The Education of Henry Adams notes that

In essentials like religion, ethics, philosophy; in history, literature, art; in the concepts of all science, except perhaps mathematics, the American boy of 1854 stood nearer the year 1 than to the year 1900. …. Speaking as an American of 1900, he had as yet no education at all.

It was in 1882 that the thoroughly Biblically immersed Emily Dickinson could declare that

The Bible is an antique Volume -Written by faded Men / At the suggestion of Holy Spectres (#1545).

Characters like Rolfe and Nehemiah might initially seem like conventional types of faith and skepticism. But what are we to make of Nathan (I.17) who appears as an American convert to Judaism? Descended from Puritans, he grows up on an Illinois farm where his Christian faith is progressively destroyed. One critical part of the story is the discovery of an old Deist book:

A book all but forsaken now
For more advanced ones not so frank, ⁠
Nor less in vogue and taking rank;
And yet it never shall outgrow
That infamy it first incurred,
Though—viewed in light which moderns know—
Capricious infamy absurd. ⁠

He experiments with Mormonism, but is soon disillusioned, and comes to scorn their sacred text as a “rank fable”:

a sect about him stood
In thin and scattered neighborhood; ⁠
Uncanny, and in rupture new;
Nor were all lives of members true
And good. For them who hate and heave
Contempt on rite and creed sublime,
Yet to their own rank fable cleave— ⁠
Abject, the latest shame of time;
These quite repelled, for still his mind
Erring, was of no vulgar kind.

He ultimately meets and marries a Jewish woman, and duly converts.

I stress here that Nathan is not a central character of Clarel, nor is his back story essential to understanding the larger narrative. He is the focus of one canto out of 150. But throughout the book, we repeatedly find these vignettes about contemporary American faith, and about believers.

To take another topic that runs through the work, Clarel exists in a highly cosmopolitan world where he encounters multiple other faiths, either directly, or through reading, as in the case of Buddhists and Hindus. As he contemplates the commonalities of those believers, he realizes how similar they are, and grasps the “intersympathy of creeds” (I.5). That was a common discovery among American intellectuals of the era, as they explored Asian texts and scriptures, and in the process discovered comparative religion. A canto of Clarel is devoted to the Indian god Rama (I.32). Like Clarel himself, many went on to ask how Christianity could stake any unique claim to truth or revelation. Running through the poem is the whole question of the Bible, and how far it could be received as literal truth.

Those threats to faith could take many forms. Clarel discovers the diary of growing doubt kept by a friend

with the heart to brave
All questions on that primal ground
Laid bare by faith’s receding wave. ⁠(I.19)

That has to be a reference to Matthew Arnold’s Dover Beach (published in 1867)

Like so many contemporaries, Clarel too has his moments of doubt, before his faith is reaffirmed, and then challenged once again. With access to so many religious and philosophical systems so easy, conversion to other ways of belief becomes easy, and commonplace. Faith is in constant flux.

In an age of so many scientific discoveries, when underwater telegraph cables were spanning the globe, creating a kind of Victorian Internet, why could God not give humanity more direct proofs of his existence and his commands? As Clarel takes part in Pentecost day processions in Jerusalem, he wonders:

From slopes whence even Echo’s gone,

Wending, he murmurs in low tone:

“They wire the world–far under sea

They talk; but never comes to me

A message from beneath the stone.” (IV.34)

But what would the world be without faith? Later sections of Clarel imagine the consequences of doubt and secularization, and how they might lead to chaos and even destructive revolution. Undoubtedly, Melville is here thinking of the recent Paris Commune (1871) and its atrocities against the church and clergy. “Woe ⁠To us; without a God, ’tis woe!” (IV.20)

I have mainly been focusing here on the first canto of four. Reasons of length discourage further description, but I hope I make my point about just how much is here waiting to be read and discovered.

Previous Post

June 25, 2020

Religion, Race, and "Never Have I Ever": A Roundtable Discussion

Next Post

June 29, 2020 Consolation in a Time of Plague

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many Gospels are in the New Testament?

Select your answer to see how you score.

4 3 5 6