Native Americans, the Ten Lost Tribes, and the Book of Mormon

Last updated on: May 7, 2020 at 12:09 am by johnturner

Native Americans, the Ten Lost Tribes, and the Book of Mormon 2020-05-06T22:12:49-04:00 johnturner

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“What became of the ten tribes of Israel,” asked former Mayflower passenger Edward Winslow, “when their own country and cities were planted and filled with strangers?” Winslow had a second question: “what family, tribe, kindred, or people was it that first planted, and afterwards filled that vast and long unknown country of America?” As did many Europeans and Americans who came after him, Winslow had one answer to these twin questions. “It is not less probable that these Indians should come from the stock of Abraham,” he wrote, “than any other nation this day known in the world.” Winslow wrote at a time when like-minded puritans anticipated the rapid arrival of the millennium. The king was dead. The bishops were overthrown. Surely Christ’s millennial reign was nigh. Therefore, Winslow expected the imminent conversion of Jews to Christianity. Thus, he urged Protestants in England to support missionary work among the Natives of America as a means to contribute to the fulfillment of ancient prophecy.

American Indians as Jews? In her wide-ranging Old Canaan in a New World, Elizabeth Fenton traces the rise and fall of this curious but curiously persistent idea through a succession of texts, beginning with the English Presbyterian minister Thomas Thorowgood and ending with the American novelist De Witt Clinton Chipman. With some exceptions, most proponents of the Hebraic Indian theory conceded that they lacked proof but nevertheless found it compelling. They did so, Fenton explains, because “it simultaneously accounted for the presence of American peoples, explained their absence from biblical narratives, and solved a longstanding sacred mystery.” That mystery related to the eighth-century BC conquest of the northern kingdom of Israel. “In the ninth year of Hoshea the king of Assyria,” reported Second Kings, “the king of Assyria took Samaria, and carried Israel away into Assyria.” Because prophets such as Isaiah and Ezekiel predicted the regathering of the Israelites, many Jews and Christians down through the ages speculated that the descendants of these lost tribes were “somewhere, hidden from view but waiting to reappear.” Perhaps in America.

Any history of the Hebraic Indian theory seems to lead to the Book of Mormon, but Fenton doesn’t rush to get us there. Her analysis of texts by Thorowgood, James Adair, Elias Boudinot, Mordecai Manuel Noah, and William Apess are first rate. Best of all, from my vantage point, is the intellectual and theological scaffolding she erects around these men and their texts. Along the way, readers will encounter probability theory, ethnography, Methodism, and other developments, which help explain why the authors and at least some of their readers embraced the idea that Indians were the descendants of Jews. Fenton’s discussion of Apess – a Pequot and Methodist minister, and one of my favorite figures in the history of American religion – is especially compelling. She suggests that for Apess, the theory was not “a means of inserting himself into the linear timeline of American Christianity” but rather “a site for claiming a past unavailable to white Christians and thereby moving beyond the reach of colonial time.”

The first several chapters of Old Canaan whetted my appetite for Fenton’s engagement with the Book of Mormon and the Latter-day Saints. In many ways, this chapter was worth the wait. Joseph Smith published the Book of Mormon within a culture in which the idea of American Indians as the descendants of Jews had gained wide acceptance. But Smith did more than simply regurgitate old ideas. The new scripture explicitly rejects the notion that the descendants of the ten lost tribes peopled the Americas. Instead, Lehi and his family come from Jerusalem (the southern kingdom of Judah) just prior to its destruction at the hands of the Babylonians. The Book of Mormon notes two other migrations of peoples to the Americas: the Jaredites, who leave at the time of the Tower of Babel; and the Mulekites, another group of Judeans. The Book of Mormon, however, does not ignore the ten allegedly lost tribes. Instead, Jesus in the Americas declares that he will show himself “unto the lost tribes of Israel.” These tribes will have some role to play in sacred history. Earlier in the Book of Mormon, God promises that he will bring about scripture among the “other tribes of the house of Israel” and that “the lost tribes of Israel shall have the words of the Nephites and the Jews.”

Presumably because of these references, Latter-day Saints engaged in sometimes wild speculation about the location of the lost tribes. In 1836, Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery reported a vision in which Moses appeared to them and told them that they would help bring about the gathering of Israel, including “the leading of the ten tribes from the Land of the North.” That was hardly the craziest idea. According to some accounts, Smith taught that the tribes had been removed to an extraterrestrial location. Fenton cites a poem of Eliza Snow that advanced this theory: “When the Lord saw fit to hide / The ‘ten lost tribes’ away’; Thou wast divided to provide / The orb on which they stay.” As the decades passed, some Latter-day Saints proposed that the tribes were everywhere from the North Pole to a realm hidden in the center of the earth.

How should one write about a theory that has gained no support from archaeologists, geneticists, and other scientists? At times, Fenton seems to enjoy the absurdity of her material. It can be rather fun to write about a collection of authors who got it all terribly wrong. Thorowgood, for instance, essentially managed to cite his own ideas as evidence for his theory. Fenton does not hesitate to point out his and others’ glaring missteps. “What [James] Adair lacks in knowledge,” she points out, “he makes up for in creativity.” She jokes about the “adorableness” of Adair referring to the segregation of women during menstruation as “lunar retreats.” Fenton also observes that Boudinot’s argumentation “rests on several inaccurate and racist assumptions about American nations, their histories, and their cultures (as well as a paltry understanding of Hebrew).” More fundamentally, she begins by noting that contemporary scholars of the Bible doubt the historicity of the narrative found in I and II Kings, and she is careful to make similar observations about 2 Esdras.

Yet Fenton punts on similar questions surrounding the Book of Mormon. Did Smith use Ethan Smith’s View of the Hebrews as a source or inspiration? Fenton notes scholars on both sides of this question, but she doesn’t offer her own view. It’s been a while since I compared the two texts. I would have enjoyed reading Fenton’s expert opinion. Given her explanation of the Book of Mormon’s original twist on the Hebraic Indian theory, I surmise that she would not bestow much if any credit on Ethan Smith (no relation to the prophet). Fenton simply brackets the more general question of the text’s authenticity as an ancient record, but she treats the Book of Mormon more gently than she does many of the other texts in Old Canaan, perhaps because “the question of legitimacy has proven tyrannical, and unproductive.” Both in this book and elsewhere, Fenton explicates the Book of Mormon within its nineteenth-century American context, so perhaps that is answer enough. Still, what’s the best approach? Should authors offer a straightforward appraisal of the Book of Mormon, or not?

For Fenton, the Hebraic Indian theory is more than a quaint and amusing notion. She contends that it was “a discourse that through several centuries buttressed and contradicted Christian millennialist claims, highlighted and papered over the fractures within American Protestantism, legitimized indigenous and Jewish claims to sovereignty in the Americas, and made space for entirely new religions.” While the previous sentence emphasizes the “malleability” of the theory, Fenton primarily understands the theory as an example of how religious beliefs “abetted the project of settler colonialism and were transformed by it.” Hebraic Indian theory and colonial ideology went hand in hand. “The notion that American settlement marked the fulfillment of a divine order,” she maintains, “justified all manner of colonial horrors.” Yes, the theory might have predicted a glorious future for converted Indians and could be used to criticized white mistreatment of Natives. But at its core, it stripped Native Americans of their own history, eliminated differences among various Native peoples, and supported colonialism if not conquest. It was a tragedy of biblical proportions.

American Religious History

Previous Post

May 6, 2020

Good News to All Nations: An Interview with Lauren Turek

Next Post

May 8, 2020 American Prophets and the Progressive Religious Tradition

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Which prophet was commanded to buy a field during a siege?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Habakkuk Jeremiah Isaiah Obadiah