Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Home
Evangelical
Wisdom from Religious History for Present Higher Education

Wisdom from Religious History for Present Higher Education

Last updated on: October 16, 2019 at 5:00 am by Andrea L. Turpin

Wisdom from Religious History for Present Higher Education 2019-10-16T03:12:42-04:00 Andrea L. Turpin

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Last week I got an unusual opportunity to live out the tagline of The Anxious Bench: “The Relevance of Religious History for Today.” A colleague asked me to guest lead a discussion in his education department graduate course “Foundations and History of Higher Education.” I have lots of experience using religious history to train graduate students—who plan to go on to be historians like me! It was fascinating to instead use religious history to train graduate students who plan to go on to be higher education professionals in either administration or student life.

This exercise got me thinking more about what wisdom we can glean from the past for how to approach higher education in the present—as administrators, teachers, parents, students, or donors.

Before the discussion, the students read an article I wrote a few years ago on how the moral formation of Princeton students changed in the decades around 1900. In brief, I argued that at Princeton during these years students experienced a much greater push to develop specifically masculine character traits (as opposed to simply Christian ones) and engage in specifically masculine forms of public service—even though the college had always admitted only men. I further argued that changing religious ideas played a key role in this shift, but that the way these changes shaped student experience on the ground was complex.

This shift in moral formation mattered in part because it reverberated beyond these students’ lives: graduates went on to have big effects on the world outside the university. Specifically, I argued that the fact “that students embraced these changes suggests that a new approach to moral formation at prominent men’s colleges—and coeducational universities that copied their approach—may help explain why, in an era when women could first access an education equal to men’s, educated men nevertheless continued to see themselves as uniquely suited for certain public leadership roles by virtue of their sex.”

So how exactly did the students of that era get that message and what can we learn from that process?

Princeton University Chapel, June 2017 // Author’s Photo

The Baylor students in the graduate course are training to be future college and university leaders, so I had them view my article as a case study. Our present culture is not the same, but our colleges and universities still have a similar structure to the one common a century ago. I therefore asked students to break into groups to discuss the different influences Princeton students encountered during their college years. Specifically, I asked them to look for what influenced undergraduates’ sense of identity and their ethical compass.

One group looked at the influence of administrators, all of whom were committed Protestants of some stripe. A second group considered the role of students’ extracurricular life, specifically as it involved voluntary religious and service organizations. The final group asked about the influence on students of wider cultural trends over which educational leaders had little control.

Princeton did not admit women until 1969 (!) but that was still in time for me to go there, so please enjoy this picture from my 10th reunion in 2011. // Author’s Photo

The Baylor graduate students uncovered a plethora of possible influences. Administrators at the time engaged in constant messaging as to the purpose of a university education. And these administrators’ religious convictions and ideals of masculinity shifted over time in mutually reinforcing ways. Administrators also had the power to pursue their vision by setting requirements for students—which courses they had to take, whether and how often they attended chapel (and what was said there), which student organizations were allowed on campus and which got favored administrative support. Finally, administrators set the admissions policy—they determined who got in, and hence who students’ peers were. These peers would in turn exercise additional influence over their fellow students.

But Princeton undergraduates also had some control over their own education. They could elect some of their own classes and lot of their own extracurricular activities. Yet sometimes here the lines of choice blurred. Princeton’s Protestant Philadelphian Society was the second most popular student organization—second only to Princeton’s two debating societies combined—and it was a branch of the national Young Men’s Christian Association (YMCA). Hence trends in the national organization—shifts in theology and gender ideals which paralleled those among Princeton’s administrators—affected trends on the ground at Princeton. Plus, as at most colleges at the time, administrators actually outsourced freshman orientation to the YMCA, which allowed the organization to recruit a far higher percentage of students than would have otherwise been possible.

Finally, students lived in a culture shaped by national trends over which leaders—be they university administrators or heads of student organizations—had little direct control. Students went to college expecting to participate in fraternities and athletics and these activities in turn shaped students’ sense of purpose. Intellectual trends within Protestant Christianity—the brewing fundamentalist-modernist controversy—shaped the mental world within which college administrators and student leaders alike staked their particular place on this spectrum. And the gender ideals of American culture at the time constituted the cultural waters in which students swam, whether with or against.

I asked discussion participants which of these three areas—administrators, student organizations, or wider culture—had more influence over undergraduates. Answers were almost equally divided. Participants also rightly listed other factors I didn’t cover as much in the article—especially individual faculty members and courses.

So what do we make of all this? As historians are fond of saying, “It’s complicated.” But I am confident from my research that the years students spend at college really do affect their sense of identity and their moral compass—not only a century ago but also today. (And the students in this class agreed when I wasn’t even grading them!) What happens at universities matters.

As I have written elsewhere, it also matters because universities have served as nodes of American culture: “wider cultural norms influenced their views, and their views in turn fed back to reshape such norms through how they trained the cultural leaders of the next generation.”

I therefore encouraged this class of future higher education professionals to study the history behind the profession they wanted to enter in order to learn to think outside the box of the present. Maybe the way we organize universities today is not the best possible way, but we can’t easily imagine alternatives without learning about previous ways it has been done. On the flip side, maybe there are good reasons for some of the things we do now and we want to make sure not to get rid of them in our efforts to reform what needs reforming.

My personal take away from the discussion was a sense of both humility and responsibility. As a professor, I cannot control what moral message students take away from their college experience as a whole. There are too many factors at play. But at the same time, I can control my own classroom and my relationships with students. And that really is a piece of the message they hear as they are forming their sense of self and ethical compass. I can also contribute to a lesser extent to the entire way students’ education is structured through committee service concerned with these larger questions. And at a university like Baylor I can think more explicitly about how faith factors in.

For those who are students, parents, or donors, I would encourage us to think about the entire college experience as a whole when we make decisions about where to attend college or what colleges to support, as well as how to navigate all the possibilities and pitfalls inevitably present wherever we choose.

More on religion and higher education next month!

American Religious History

Previous Post

October 15, 2019

Who Is an Evangelical... in Africa?

Next Post

October 17, 2019 Why My Office Door Is Always Open and What I Learned Teaching in the Opioid Epidemic

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

According to Hebrews, without what is it impossible to please God?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Obedience Sacrifice Love Faith