Patriotism is on Behalf Of, Not Against, All Nations

Last updated on: December 20, 2015 at 12:55 am by Thomas Kidd

Patriotism is on Behalf Of, Not Against, All Nations 2015-12-18T12:55:34-04:00 Thomas Kidd

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Today’s guest post is from John D. Wilsey, Assistant Professor of History and Christian Apologetics, and Associate Director, Land Center for Cultural Engagement, Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. He recently published American Exceptionalism and Civil Religion: Reassessing the History of an Idea (IVP Academic).

Is patriotism compatible with democracy? After all, a democracy is supposed to be built on a fundamental commitment to the equality of all people. But patriotism seems to necessitate inequality by preferring one nation over (and often against) another, in a sort of superior/inferior binary construction.

If patriotism does, in fact, divide humanity up on the basis of, say the Chosen and the Other, then how can Americans, who are committed to equality as a founding ideal in the Declaration of Independence, avoid hypocrisy? On the other hand, if Americans should reject patriotism, then how can they justify any unique claims about their identity? And if Americans can make no such claims, then why have a nation at all? In other words, if every nation is exceptional, then how does patriotism have any practical meaning?

These are an important question for Americans who contend for or against the concepts of exceptionalism and patriotism. They are also important for American Christians, who have a divine mandate to look to general human flourishing, not just the flourishing of the American nation. Furthermore, American patriotism is a salient issue now as it relates to the question of immigration, and especially whether or not we welcome Muslim refugees from the Middle East into our country.

Without getting into policy disputes, let us consider the question: can Americans be patriotic and remain committed to the flourishing of all nations? I think the answer is yes, and if we think historically about the question, Alexis de Tocqueville (1805-1859) and Abraham Lincoln (1809-1865) are especially persuasive. Tocqueville argued in his 1856 book on the origins and results of the French Revolution, L’Ancien Régime et la Révolution, that patriotism is a sure way for individuals to pursue general human flourishing. He acknowledged that patriotism does intuitively imply a duty to country that neglects duty toward humanity. Instead, he wrote, the opposite is true. The category of “humanity” was too large, too abstract, and too ideal for people to consider in objective and moral terms, according to Tocqueville. But people do serve the interests of humanity when they look to the benefit of their particular national community. He wrote, “I am convinced that we better serve the interests of the human species in giving each man only a particular country to love, than in wanting to inspire him on behalf of the human species, which, whatever we do, he will only consider with a distant, uncertain and cold gaze.” A person might not consider it practical to express love for humanity as a whole, but she may find it so for her country. But in loving her country, Tocqueville would argue, she loves humanity.

We might consider Christ’s teaching in the parable of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10.25-37) as illustrative of Tocqueville’s idea. Recall that Christ’s point in the parable was to objectify the ideal term “neighbor” by identifying a specific person in need—the traveler on his way to Jericho. “Neighbor” was too abstract and too slippery a term for Christ’s interlocutor, the lawyer in Luke 10.25-29. The lawyer needed a closer, more descriptive, and more local way to understand his moral duty toward humanity as a whole. Tocqueville’s method of explanation is much like Christ’s, particularly in how he explained one’s devotion toward all people via patriotism. Tocqueville localized the idea of “humanity” by pointing to one’s devotion and duty to the national family.

We find a similar idea in Lincoln’s speeches and writings. Lincoln clearly thought that the truest expressions of American patriotism were for the benefit of all humanity. For Lincoln, the Declaration of Independence was the most important founding document. It succinctly and specifically addressed the birthright of every person to equality and natural rights in its assertion that “all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.”

Lincoln believed that the American commitment to equality and natural rights extended to all people and nations. By championing the ideals expressed in the Declaration of Independence, Americans both secured them for themselves and ensured their establishment everywhere in the world. In his August 17, 1858 speech at Lewiston, Illinois, he called the Declaration “that immortal emblem of humanity.” He said that the American founders knew that human equality was directly linked to “the justice of the Creator to his creatures” and that God meant it “to all His creatures, to the whole great family of man.” Furthermore, Lincoln knew that the existence of slavery made a mockery of America’s commitment to its liberal ideals. Two months after speaking in Lewiston, Lincoln said in Peoria, Illinois, “I hate [slavery] because it deprives our republican example of its just influence in the world—enables the enemies of free institutions, with plausibility, to taunt us as hypocrites—causes the real friends of freedom to doubt our sincerity, and especially because it forces so many really good men amongst ourselves into an open war with the very fundamental principles of civil liberty . . . .” Interestingly, Lincoln here drew a distinction between American citizens and the world. American citizens were the ones “forced into open war” with each other over the issue of slavery. But people watching America from all over the world would see Americans as being hypocrites when it came to their foundational commitment to human equality and freedom, because at the time, they still abided the institution of slavery.

Lincoln famously referred to America as the “last, best hope of earth” in his December 1, 1862 Annual Message to Congress. It seems clear that Lincoln considered the United States to be an exceptional nation, from this statement alone. But the context of this statement was the ongoing Civil War and Lincoln’s proposal to bring hostilities to an end by a process of abolishing slavery. He had a deeply circumspect way of framing the issue of abolition. He had a powerful awareness that the eyes of the world were upon him and the Congress. He said, “We say we are for the Union. The world will not forget that we say this.” Here, he reminded his audience that what they did, or neglected to do, was under close observation by people everywhere. Then he argued that in championing freedom for the slave, they championed freedom for everyone—“In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the free.” Then, he said that the success or failure of this project was immediately tied to the destiny and example of the American nation: “We shall nobly save, or meanly lose, the last best hope of earth.” For Lincoln, America could only hold this lofty position as long as it was true to its liberal professions.

I hasten to clarify—there is a clear difference between patriotism (which is what Tocqueville and Lincoln represented in their writings and speeches) and nationalism. David T. Koyzis helpfully distinguished between patriotism and nationalism in his book, Political Visions and Illusions: A Survey and Christian Critique of Contemporary Ideologies. He wrote that patriotism is defined as love for country, properly and justly applied—“it is a limited affection for a community of fellow citizens bound together for purposes of government and based in a defined territory” (118). It is not an idolatrous worship of nation, wherein the people view themselves as God’s chosen. Patriotism does not divide humanity up, as Koyzis wrote, “on the basis of pride and tribal selfishness” (105) favoring “the members of the titular ethnic group of those of other ethnic groups” (115). That’s not patriotism, but nationalism. For Koyzis, nationalism is clearly seen in Nazi Germany during the 1930s and 40s. When people think of patriotic loyalty, they should not equate that form of loyalty with its imperialist, exclusionist counterfeit, nationalism.

From Tocqueville and Lincoln—and from Koyzis’ thoughtful reflections—we see that patriotism, in a communal affection for a particular national group, based upon shared commitment to human dignity, equality, and natural rights, with, as Koyzis said, “a dedication to the maintenance of the body politic” (118) is an avenue which leads to general human flourishing. While nationalism is a perversion of patriotism that is indeed incompatible with democracy in its rejection of human equality, patriotism serves to profit and enlarge human civilization.

This is one reason why American exceptionalism, properly defined, can help serve as a model for healthy civic and global engagement. Closed American exceptionalism—the idea that America is God’s chosen nation, divinely tasked for a mission to Americanize the world, that it is morally regenerate and indispensable to the world’s security and stability—is an example of Koyzis’ nationalism. On the other hand, open American exceptionalism is not a religious construct, but a political/social idea animated by the Declaration of Independence, the Bill of Rights, the Gettysburg Address, Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address, and other foundational documents in the American political canon. Under open American exceptionalism, America serves as an example to the world. America is not innocent of profound wrong, to be sure. Americans are often guilty of repudiating their own founding ideals. But as Americans work to be true to their ideals, they, as Lincoln said, “shall not only have saved the Union; but we shall have so saved it, as to make, and to keep it, forever worthy of the saving.”

The victory of Union arms over the Confederacy in 1865 was an example of how Americans worked to secure the stated aims of their national founding. Their work was imperfect, as the next 150 years have proven. But their patriotic work was not for Americans alone. Their patriotism in 1861-65 served as a benefit to the whole human race.

Abraham Lincoln

Christian Nation

Abraham Lincoln

Alexis de Tocqueville

American Exceptionalism

civil religion

John D. Wilsey

Patriotism

Previous Post

December 19, 2015

Congratulations to Our Own!

Next Post

December 21, 2015 Museum Catechesis

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe Guest Post guest post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was the last king of Judah before the Babylonian exile?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Jehoiakim Zedekiah Josiah Hezekiah