Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

anxiousbench

The Curse of Memory

Last updated on: December 29, 2014 at 2:30 am   by Philip Jenkins

The Curse of Memory 2014-12-26T16:10:46-04:00 Philip Jenkins

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The recent furor over shootings of civilians by police has inspired a lot of discussion about eyewitness testimony and the nature of memory, and the question of just how reliable memory can be. If you read the grand jury testimony in the Ferguson, Missouri, case, a number of witnesses reported things that simply did not happen, and could not have happened. Nor did those misleading witnesses necessarily lean to one or other side in the case. If they had been true, some of those statements have benefited the prosecution, others the defense.People were not necessarily lying: usually they were reporting on what they believed they had seen. That affair raised some questions for me – not so much about the current controversies over Ferguson and similar shootings, but rather over the more general issue of how historians work.

However much we think we record events like a video camera, what we recall is subject to a great deal of editing, censoring and reconstruction, depending on our expectations and assumptions. Hal Arkowitz and Scott O. Lilienfeld did a well-regarded piece in Scientific American back in 2009 on “Why Science Tells Us Not to Rely on Eyewitness Accounts,” arguing that “Eyewitness testimony is fickle and, all too often, shockingly inaccurate.” There are now some excellent surveys by Terrence McCoy in the Washington Post, and Jesse Singal in New York Magazine. In a New York Times op-ed, psychologists Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons conclude that “It is just as misguided to conclude that someone who mis-remembers must be lying as it is to defend a false memory in the face of contradictory evidence. We should be more understanding of mistakes by others, and credit them when they admit they were wrong. We are all fabulists, and we must all get used to it.”

So we are all fabulists …

These arguments about the construction of memory have a special resonance for historians like myself who work on different eras. In many ways, I prefer the distant and long-ago ones because you do not have to deal with the curses of memory and oral history.

Like every other historian, I use documents, which vary in their character depending on the time period. For the early twentieth century, that means official documents and government reports; expert and professional writings on the subject, both in book-length studies and in articles published in scholarly or professional journals; articles published in general-interest magazines; newspaper articles and editorials; and popular culture materials, such as films, novels, pamphlets, or (from the 1920s) radio programs. Visual materials are great – cartoons, postcards, posters, billboards, advertising materials. If can find them, quantitative surveys are wonderful.

You have to decide how far to supplement these materials with oral history accounts and interviews. These can be fine, depending on the gap in time separating event and recollection, and the information you are trying to find. If a memoir written in 1924 is describing experiences in the First World War, that is great, as it is near-contemporary. But what about an account written long afterwards, say in 1970? The same issue arises with oral interviews.

Most writers would be cautious to verify such oral history accounts with strictly contemporary written or published accounts. In reconstructing broad social attitudes, books, pamphlets, magazines and newspapers are unquestionably superior to personal recollections – always provided, of course, that published sources are chosen carefully and objectively, and used responsibly.

Let me take a specific example. Imagine that, as a historian, I wanted to reconstruct public attitudes to President John F. Kennedy during his time in office. I could hypothetically use interviews, but the subjects have to be selected extremely carefully. The interviews only have any validity if subjects were scientifically chosen to represent a random sample of the whole population, rather than ten or a hundred individuals I happened to encounter.

Much more serious though is the issue of memory, a problem very familiar to oral historians. People might just remember events accurately, but attitudes and perceptions are much harder to grasp. If a man was asked today what he thought of JFK in 1962, his answer would be affected by fifty years of subsequent events and reflections, and all the associated hindsight. Asking him what other people thought of the President at that time would be even thornier.

That does not mean that the interview subject would be deliberately deceptive, but in many cases, his account would reflect the accumulated perceptions and re-evaluations of the past fifty years, rather than the actual views held at that time. Try as we might to be scrupulously fair and balanced, we inevitably tend to retroject later perceptions and values into the past, while censoring ideas that we held at the time, which in hindsight seem embarrassing or ugly. That is especially true in hot-button issues of race, gender or sexuality.

We are all fabulists; we are all, also, self-censors.

Even more troubling, those comments don’t even begin to get to the interaction between interviewer and subject. Reading interviews or oral history accounts, it’s always striking to see the role of the interviewer in shaping the conversation, in deciding what subjects are or are not worthy of attention. When the interviewer asks “So, what did you think of X?” the subject is immediately alerted that this is something that he should have had an opinion about, and often, by implication, that his opinion should have taken a particular form. He will then formulate an appropriate answer.

That’s not a criticism of the competence of oral historians, rather than of the whole process. The fact that I am interviewing Mr. Smith means that I have chosen and defined him because he was in a position to know about X – although that might not have been a subject of any great interest in the past era.

It’s like dealing with survey evidence. Tell me the survey question, and I will tell you the answer it will produce.

I have been discussing mainstream secular figures, but special problems apply when we are dealing with religious aspects of history. Conceivably, an informant might recall a charismatic spiritual figure according to the expectations that surrounded him or her at the time, or in the light of hopes that were subsequently disappointed. (Of course, such issues also surround secular “charismatics” like JFK himself).

In trying to reconstruct broad social attitudes at the time, much later interviews of people living in that era are dubious, except as far as they can be validated by strictly contemporary sources, including opinion surveys, and a content analysis of contemporary media, including books, magazines, newspaper stories, television and radio programs, films, and so on. Interviews can provide interesting anecdotes, but as sources for attitudes in particular historical eras, they should be used with extreme caution.

Courts and lawyers have a lot to learn from historians in these matters, in terms of the kind of evidence they regard as particularly valuable. Contrary to the familiar legal assumption, first-hand testimony is not always the best way of reconstructing the past. Or rather, it would be, if witnesses were not cursed with regular, fallible, malleable, human memories.

 

Philip Jenkins

construction of historical memory

eyewitness testimony

historical methodology

legal testimony

memory

oral history

Previous Post



December 26, 2014

The Sicilian’s Tale

Next Post



December 30, 2014 Top Posts of the Year, Anxious Bench


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category abolitionism Abortion Abraham Joshua Heschel Abraham Kuyper Abraham Lincoln Academia Activism Adam Renberg Advent Adventist africa African American Religion Agnes Howard Albert Camus American History American Religious History American Revolution American West Anabaptists Ancient History Andrea Turpin Andrei Tarkovsky Anglicanism Annales Ansley Lillian Quiros anti-Catholicism Antisemitism Anxious Bench apologetics Apparitions Arash Azizi Archaeology archives art Artificial Intelligence Asia Asian Americans Augustine Authors Bad Bunny Baptism Baptists Barack Obama Battle of Hastings Benjamin Franklin Bernard-Henri Levy Beth Allison Barr Beth Moore Bethany Mannon Bible Bill Cunningham Billy Graham Black Music Bob Dylan Body Boenhoffer Books Breastfeeding Bruce Springsteen C.S. Lewis Calvinism Cancel Culture Capitalism Carmelites Catholicism Cedric Robinson Cesar Chavez Charismaticism charity Charles Dickens Charles Lindbergh Che Guevara Chicago Children Chinese Christianity Chris Gehrz Christ Christian death Christian Higher Education Christian life Christian Nation Christian Nationalism Christianity Today Christmas Church life Church Practice cinema Civil Religion Civil Rights Movement Civil War civility Classics Climate Change Cold War Colonial Mexico colonialism Comer Communism community complementarianism Conference on Faith and History Congregationalism Conspiracies Conspiracy Conversion Narratives Coronavirus Costa Rica Council of Nicaea Covid-19 Creation Critical Race Theory Crusades Culture culture wars Daniel K. Williams David Barton David Swartz Death Ways death with dignity DEI democracy Democratic Party Devotion Digital Age Diplomacy discipleship diversity Donald Trump Drama Dua Lipa Early Church early modern Early modern Catholicism Easter Eastern Christianity economic exploitation Education elections Elie Wiesel Elizabeth II Elizabeth Taylor emotions Empire Engineering England enslavement Entertainment Episcopal Church Erica Ramirez eschatology Eurocentrism Evangelicalism Evangelicals Exegesis Family Feminism Film Flannery O'Connor folk music Food Foreign Policy founding fathers Franciscans Franciscus Junius fundamentalism Funerals G.K. Chesterton Gender Genocide genre geography George W. Bush George Washington George Whitefield Global Christianity Global church Grief Guadalupe guest post Guest Post gun control gun violence Gustavo Gutierrez Hamid Dabashi Harold John Ockenga Harvest Hate Hawaiian Christianity Healing health care Heather Cox Richardson Hell Heresy Hermeneutics Higher Education Hinduism Hippocratic oath Historical Fiction Historical Methodology Historical Profession Historical Profession Historical Theology Historical Thinking historiography Holidays Holocaust horror movies Human rights Humanitarian Work humanities Hummingbirds Hungary hymns Imago Dei Immigration Injustice Interviews Iran Islam Islamophobia Israel Ivan's Childhood Jacob Randolph James Bratt Janine Giordano Drake Japanese history Japanese Literature Jean Paul Sartre Jesse Miranda Jesus Jesus Christ Jimmy Carter Joan Baez Joan Didion Joanne Freeman João B. Chaves Joao Chaves Joey Cochran John Calvin John Fea John Tillotson John Turner Johnny Cash Jonathan Edwards Jonathan Tran Joseph Smith Josh Howerton Journalism Jr. Judaism Jürgen Moltmann Just War Justice Justin Brierley Karl Barth Katelyn Beaty koi ponds Kris Kristofferson Kristin Kobes Du Mez Latin American Religious History Latino Americans Lectio Divina Leisure Lent Leonard Cohen liberal arts liberalism Liberation Theology Linda Ronstadt Lisa Clark Diller Literature Lou Reed Lynchings Lynneth Miller Renberg Mainline Protestantism Malcolm Foley Marilyn Monroe Maritime history Mark Noll Marriage Martin Luther Martin Luther King Martyrdom Marxism Mary Masih Alinejad mass shootings material culture medieval Christianity Medieval Ethiopia Melissa Borja memory Mennonites Mental Health Mental Illness Methodism Mexican Americans Mexicans Mike Madrid Miles Mullin Min Jin Lee Miscarriage Missionaries Mister Rogers Mitt Romney modernity Monasticism Mormonism Motherhood Mothers of the Church Moving Music Musicals Nadya Williams Nahua Christianity Native Americans Natsume Sōseki New Contributor New England New Year New York Nico Non-Violent Protest Orthodoxy pacifism Paleo Evangelicals Palestinians Parenting Patti Smith Paul Kingsnorth Pedro Calderón de la Barca Pentecostalism Philip Jenkins Phillis Wheatley physician-assisted suicide pilgrimage Pilgrims pluralism Plutocracy Poetry Politics Pope Francis Pope Leo XIV post-modernism prayer preaching Presbyterians prosperity gospel Protest Public history Publishing Puritans purity culture Quakers race Race Massacres Racial Capitalism racial reconciliation racialization Racism Raha Bahloulipour Re-Enchantment reading Reformation Refugees religion and the university religion and war Religious Freedom Religious Nones Religious Pluralism Religious Symbols religious violence Republican Party Revival Rita Coolidge Ritual Roger Williams Roman Catholic church Royalty Russell Moore same-sex marriage Sarah Irving-Stonebraker Scandinavia Science Science and Technology Scopes trial Scriptural Interpretation secularism Selena Quintanilla seminary Seventh-Day Adventists sexual morality Sexuality Sikhs Silence slaveholders theology Slavery Slavoj Zizek social justice Social Media Southern Baptist Convention Southern Religion Spain Spiritual Autobiography Spiritual but not religious Spiritual Discipline Sports Stanley Hauerwas Suffering Summer Camps Sunday Night Odds and Ends Supernatural Supreme Court Syriac Christianity Tal Howard Taylor Swift Teaching Technology Television Thanksgiving The Beatles The Mission theater TheoBros Theology Thomas Dixon Thomas Jefferson Thomas Kidd Thomas Merton Tim Gloege Tim Walz Tom Holland Tourism tradition Tragedy Translation Transnationalism Travel Trump Ukraine Uncategorized Unitarians United Methodist Church US History Vanessa Chan Velvet Underground Verónica A. Gutiérrez Veronica Gutierrez Vikings Violence Virgin Mary Virtue Virtue ethics Visions Voting War WCTU Wendell Berry Westminster Assembly White Evangelicalism Wildfires Winnie the Pooh Witches women Women in Ministry Women's and Gender Studies Work Worship writing Yasunari Kawabata Zena Hitz

Select a Month October 2026 September 2026 August 2026 July 2026 June 2026 May 2026 April 2026 March 2026 February 2026 January 2026 December 2025 November 2025 October 2025 September 2025 August 2025 July 2025 June 2025 May 2025 April 2025 March 2025 February 2025 January 2025 December 2024 November 2024 October 2024 September 2024 August 2024 July 2024 June 2024 May 2024 April 2024 March 2024 February 2024 January 2024 December 2023 November 2023 October 2023 September 2023 August 2023 July 2023 June 2023 May 2023 April 2023 March 2023 February 2023 January 2023 December 2022 November 2022 October 2022 September 2022 August 2022 July 2022 June 2022 May 2022 April 2022 March 2022 February 2022 January 2022 December 2021 November 2021 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 June 2021 May 2021 April 2021 March 2021 February 2021 January 2021 December 2020 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 August 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 April 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 December 2019 November 2019 October 2019 September 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Facebook



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

On what mountain did God give the Ten Commandments?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mount Zion Mount Sinai Mount Moriah Mount Ararat

Related posts from Anxious Bench

Family

Fairies, Witches, Folk Horror, and the Secret Commonwealth

Anxious Bench

Family

Hogg’s Justified Sinner: A Gothic Classic for Halloween

Anxious Bench

Family

James Hogg, Weird Wives, and Feminist Witches

Anxious Bench

Family

How an Explosive Book Rewrote the Study of...

Anxious Bench

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Evangelical

Pope Leo Celebrates Mass for Nurses & Docs...

I don't have any idea how he did it, but Pope Leo...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I: Matthew...

The Sermon on the Mount, Part I (Matthew 4:12-5:12) St. Matthew moves...

What's up from Crossway

What's up from Crossway: Reviewing some of their latest A few weeks...

Janie Learns the Way of the Cross: A...

Teaching children about Jesus' Passion can be challenging. Many parents and educators...

Looking For Good Catholic Writing - October 2026

He alone extends the heavens, and he walks upon the waves of...

Luther on Tools

In "Irreplaceable," our book on vocation and technology, Trevor Sutton and I...

view all Evangelical blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube