Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Andy Gill

Home
Progressive Christian
Mark Driscoll vs. The Internet

Mark Driscoll vs. The Internet

Last updated on: August 4, 2014 at 6:58 pm by Andy Gill

Mark Driscoll vs. The Internet 2014-08-04T18:58:25-05:00 Andy Gill

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Spoiler Alert: Mark Driscoll is losing.

I don’t have a TV – but after a bit of googling and searching around, I haven’t found much about Pastor Mark outside of the Internet. It seems now that every week, Mark Driscoll is apologizing. There was his open letter apology that went viral on reddit, there was a nuanced sort of apology in a sermon, the recent video in which was his most straight forward apology.

Oh and then there’s the plagiarizing debacle, the William Wallace II trolling apology, and then Driscoll blames Haggard’s affair with a male escort not on the former pastor’s homosexuality. As if this were not enough, there are seemingly dozens of stories of abuse online: Bizzare reports of patriarchal abuse and exorcism, traumatizing reports from fellow employees, and long time friends of his re-sigining.

People are pissed. People are dismayed. Most of all, I think people are hurt. Now it seems like these very people are calling for his resignation, well – at least Matthew Paul Turner is.

I haven’t really talked about Mark Driscoll at length, here. Mainly because 1) I don’t know him, 2) I don’t feel right using him as a means to drive traffic [this is not to say that everyone who mentions him is doing that], 3) It’s one thing to put down an institution, it’s another thing to come at an individual [i.e. Rob Bell, Neo-Calvinist’s alike went from disagreeing with his theology, to making it personal by calling him a heretic].

I want to be sensitive to Driscoll as a person despite how much I might disagree with his theology as a leader. Having said that, I’m not against calling out people or individuals, just never at the cost of their humanity.

It’s no secret that I despise his theology and that I want to live to see the end of his patriarchal-misogynistic-racist institution, but again, I do not want to see the end of Mark Driscoll. I 100% agree with Jonathan Merrit, we must accept Driscoll’s apology, though this does not mean we permit his abuses [Which Merrit, also says in his article].

From a Christ-like perspective, forgiveness must always be an option, no matter how deplorable one’s action might be. Be against any institution, but we must always love our enemies.

As tough as it can be to admit, I have no qualm’s with Driscoll, but I have a problem with what Driscoll symbolizes, preaches, represents, and therefore perpetuates. This being an abusive institution responsible for the wounding of generations, and quite literally, millions of lives.

For a majority of us, the question should not be, “Does Mark Driscoll deserve all that is happening to him?” but rather, “How much longer should we be victimized by this theology, and subjected to oppressive teachings and institutions such as his?” The problem is not Mark Driscoll, the problem is a cultivated and continued authoritarianistic-culture found within evangelicalism[1]. It’s a malignant tumor that needs to be removed as soon as possible.

Sometimes, as reality has it, in order to build up, we need to take out. Right now, the information age has allowed the beginnings of this “taking out” to happen.

The worst part of this, is that it seems like Driscoll, and his various other counterparts do not even realize or fully understand why their not liked, or what exactly they’ve done wrong, kind of like the pastors who email me and berate me. Driscoll is claiming that his “angry young prophet days” are over, and that he is taking up the role of a pastor, but I greatly question if his days as a prophet ever truly began. Rachel Held Evans puts it quite well saying in a recent article:

“But let’s be clear: There is nothing “prophetic” about degrading women… and using hateful slurs to talk about LGBT people.”

In scripture, both old and new testament, I never see a prophet continuing to push the downtrodden further down. There words of a prophet were always geared towards the powerful and privileged, yes to even God’s chosen people, Israel. I’m disgusted by patriarchy, misogyny, racism, and any other form of oppression, I want to see neo-Calvinism [which is just calvinism in skinny jeans marketed to millennials], and fundamental conservatism go away.

I want people to have room enough for healing without having to daily face a re-traumatizing imposition from the moral-right. This is including enough space for Driscoll and his current or former leadership to also grow and heal. But at no point should the feelings of the oppressor take precedence over the healing of the oppressed. A bully is not being bullied when they’re being called out for their bullying, meaning a victim of bullying, cannot immediately turn around and then bully her/his oppressor.

“It is a basic premise of activism in general that the feelings of those victimized and hurt take precedence over the feelings of those that have done the victimizing and hurting. Abusers, bullies, and harassers frequently argue that they shouldn’t be punished, or publicly scorned, or suffer various other consequences, because it would hurt them—hurt their feelings, their reputations, their careers. But we [Christians] acknowledge that, even if this is true, it’s not as important as ensuring that their victims are represented, and supported, and receive justice insofar as we are able.”

In other words: My concern is for the victims, not for Mark Driscoll or his institutions[3]. We must remember that victims of abuse are not “dividing the Church” simply by expressing their hurt. They were pushed to the outskirts of this so-called Church, so if we want unity, then we must go to the oppressed, marginalized, and abused becoming part of their community. Is this not what Jesus did?

I don’t want Driscoll to resign, nor do I want him to cease to exist. What I’d like to see is Mars Hill close their doors. I don’t think the church needs another reform, I think the church is in need of a revolution. Too many of us have lost our ability to trust a reformed set of beliefs that have lead to a misogynistic leadership.

The issue is not Mark Driscoll, the issue is what Mark Driscoll represents. This is as a warning shot being fired into the air notifying the reformed that their set status quo will not be tolerated. Robbing people of the basic human rights, inciting institutionalized violence, discrimination because of gender/race/sexuality… all of this is unacceptable. Driscoll is the frontman, but quasi-prosperity preacher Steven Furtick, Financial “guru” Dave Ramsey, and numerous others are all in and on the same sinking ship.

Having the freedom to believe what you want to believe verses imposing what you believe onto other people are two separate, and completely different things.

With all of this being said, Christians or not, the questions must be considered: What does it look like for us to love our “enemies”? Is it possible to love our enemies without being subjected to their abuses? How can we love Mark Driscoll or anyone who holds such theology that one might so adamantly disagree with and be hurt by? What does love in this case look like without it becoming a cheapened grace justifying abuse…?

[1] by “evangelicalism” I mean the fundamental-right, conservatism portion of Christianity.

[2] I think we need to also be well aware of the fact that many will take advantage of us this.

[3] This is not to say that Driscoll’s humanity should be ignored.

Previous Post

July 30, 2014

Dear Pastor Who Keeps Emailing Me...

Next Post

August 6, 2014 10 Reasons I Love Pope Francis

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Books Buzzfeed Christian Church Church Culture Dating Dechurched eXvangelical Guest Post Humor Inspirational Justice LGBTQ Life Marriage Media Millennials Mini Post Monday Money Podcast Politics Race Reason Relationships Science Sex Socioeconomic Theology Theology Uncategorized Video Wednesday Youth Ministry

Select a Month June 2020 March 2020 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 January 2013 December 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who killed his own brother out of jealousy and became the first murderer in the Bible?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Cain Esau Ishmael Jacob

Support this
Column