Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Andy Gill

Home
Progressive Christian
Bill Nye vs Ken Ham: Witnessing a Train Wreck

Bill Nye vs Ken Ham: Witnessing a Train Wreck

Last updated on: April 5, 2017 at 4:43 pm by Andy Gill

Bill Nye vs Ken Ham: Witnessing a Train Wreck 2017-04-05T16:43:51-05:00 Andy Gill

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

I’ve come to find that winning a debate isn’t so much about who’s more “right” but rather who has better rhetoric. Last night during the debate, I think it was pretty clear that, although Ham had a couple good points, he was neither more “right” nor did he have better rhetoric.

Though he did make a valiant effort to win by creating some “alternate reality” in which natural law, empirical scientific evidence, and reasonable logic don’t exist…

I question when exactly Christians are going to learn that we cannot use logical reasoning to prove our faith; hence, the use of the word, “faith.”

I’ll say it since it seems no one else will:

What we believe is illogical. Call me blasphemous, but take a step back for a second and think about the sheer, utter, ridiculousness of our basic/foundational ideology:

The virgin birth.
Jesus being both fully God and fully human.
Jesus living a perfect life.
Jesus rising from the dead, after being crucified.
Jesus floating/ascending up to heaven after rising from the dead.
Jesus returning on a white horse, with a sword in his mouth, and apparently a tattoo of his name on his leg (or thigh?) #BadAssJesus
And finally, believing that one day, we’re also going to rise from the dead in bodily form (many don’t know this is what the Christian bible teaches, instead they’ve bought into more of a Gnostic sounding view of the resurrection).

(Sidenote: research through the NSYR lead by Christian Smith and Melinda Denton present in their book Soul Searching, that most young Christians are not able to articulate what they believe in. Insinuating they don’t even know the basic message of the Gospel).

If your knee jerk reaction is to become defensive and pull out your apologetics, or learned system of defense, in which your youth pastor indoctrinated you with (which in this case might have been me, but uh, that’s a post for another time), then you’ve missed the point. Here’s a fun painful example, of what that looks like:

You’re not going to argue someone into believing this stuff, all the while your refusal to admit that your set of beliefs as a Christian are illogical is not helping, its only frustrating. It’s leaving nonChristians such as Mark Joseph Stern, of Slate.com saying things like:

“The maddening aspect of creationism is not just that it’s ridiculous, but that it insists it’s a perfectly logical, empirically verifiable scientific explanation of the universe.”

There has to come a point of humility in which one must admit that what they believe and buy into is a little bit weird.

To argue against scientific empirical evidence with a rebuttal of “Because the bible tells me so,” is insufficient (which is why I wrote this). To make a bold statement claiming that 4,000 years or so ago natural law just changed without any empirical evidence documenting this change, and you believe that simply “because the bible tells you so,” is also insufficient. It’s presenting a baseless fallacy, a conclusion with no reasoning, and a judgment with little facts…

Ignoring the empirical research and data provided in regards to evolution, that seemingly refute this idea of Creationism is annoying, and at worst it is deterring many away from Jesus.

“If I were an outsider, I would correctly assume that following Jesus means I must check my brains at the door in regards to science, and that I would need to become politically conservative… in which case, signing onto the Jesus movement would become a “thanks, but no thanks” situation.” – Benjamin Corey

I never see Jesus saying, that in order for us to show others that God loves them you must do so through argumentative rhetoric (i.e. apologetics). I see Jesus giving us a new commandment exerting us to love one another and saying… “By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.” This is why I think and believe one of the most dangerous things we can do with our lives, in our context, is blindly buy into an ideology we know very little to nothing about.

It’s the question as to whether or not we want to be right or if we want to be loving.

Right now the single cause of atheism is not because we’re so “illogical,” but because we’re so hypocritical. As Brennan Manning puts it so well, “we’ve acknowledged Jesus with our lips but yet we’ve denied Him by our lifestyle.”

We’ve done so much harm to others justifying it through our inane logic of, “because the bible told me so,” creating laws exasperating the inequality, and oppression of people based off of arbitrary factors.

What if instead of pouring $100 million into the re-creation of Noah’s ark we focus on the malnutrition of the poor (not just making this up, Ken Ham is trying to make this an actuality)? Unless there’s a big ass flood coming again, this is a definite waste of time and money (in Christian/evangelical terms, it “lacks good stewardship”).

Sidenote: Imagine what a $100 million could do for those impoverished, hungry, and malnourished… (Shoot maybe I’ll make a kickstarter, but seriously… who’s with me?)

In my opinion the best way to give sufficient evidence of Christianity is NOT through a “logical rhetoric” but rather through the power and love of God lived out daily i.e. serving the poor, seeking justice, promoting equality, living out a gospel that is inclusive as opposed to exclusive, oppressive, and/or uninformed.

Christian

Church

Bill Nye

Bill Nye vs Ken Ham: Witnessing A Train Wreck

Creationism

Ken Ham

Previous Post

January 30, 2014

First Clip of Left Behind

Next Post

February 14, 2014 My Thoughts on Homosexuality

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Books Buzzfeed Christian Church Church Culture Dating Dechurched eXvangelical Guest Post Humor Inspirational Justice LGBTQ Life Marriage Media Millennials Mini Post Monday Money Podcast Politics Race Reason Relationships Science Sex Socioeconomic Theology Theology Uncategorized Video Wednesday Youth Ministry

Select a Month June 2020 March 2020 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 January 2013 December 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was Deborah's military commander?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Barak Samson Jephthah Gideon

Support this
Column