Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Andy Gill

Home
Progressive Christian
1500 Year Old Bible [and why you shouldn’t trust everything you read on the internet]

1500 Year Old Bible [and why you shouldn’t trust everything you read on the internet]

Last updated on: November 23, 2015 at 9:20 pm by Andy Gill

1500 Year Old Bible [and why you shouldn’t trust everything you read on the internet] 2015-11-23T21:20:01-05:00 Andy Gill

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

So apparently in 2012 a 1500 year old bible re-surfaced in Turkey after supposedly having been seized by a mob of smugglers. More interestingly, to me at least, these “deviants” are said to have been charged with smuggling antiquities, illegal excavations, and the possession of explosives [can you hear the wheels churning in the minds of hollywood? #NationalTreasure8!].

Photocopies of this 1500 year old “Bible,” are estimated up to $1.7 million dollars, while the entire book itself is estimated to be around $28 million. This particular bible is speculated to contain the possible original Gospel of Barnabas in which undermines Christian faith on the resurrection and portrays more of an Islamic version of Jesus.

So far no copies of Jesus’ words in this book have been released to the public. Although there is speculation around this bible stating that it holds inside of it “The Gospel of Barnabas”. If you’re like me, and you’re not too privy to the Gospel of Barnabas – it is not included with the original four gospels.

I have not spent crazy amounts of time “researching” this 1500 year old bible, other than Googling it a bit. Although, if you do Google it you’ll find statements being made 2-years removed from this book re-emerging with very little, to no citations or credible references. Some get the Gospel of Barnabas confused with the Epistle of Barnabas or the Acts of Barnabas, all the while we don’t even know if this book contains anything even written by a Barnabas.

Something I personally need to consider is the fact that I’ve been in seminary since 2012 and I have heard nothing about this until this recently. This says a few things:

Seminary’s a bubble, I might as well have lived in a cave, or under a rock.
I can’t afford cable, let alone a TV.
Scholars have far more important things to discuss that have gained credibility and merit their time [1].

To no one’s surprise, The Vatican Insider was quick to label this so-called “bible” a hoax. As its been widely publicized as a book in which directly undermines Christian thought, things such as the crucifixion and resurrection. It seems as if things are now turning into speculation, hypothetic, and bizarre conspiracy theories which make [failed] attempts at connecting this text, which none of us have read, to the reason Pope Benedict resigned. #illuminati

Either way, hoax or not, my point isn’t to highlight this 1500 year old bible but rather to highlight how the internet has a tendency to blow things like this way out of proportion…

Such as this example over on RELEVANT claiming there is a “Newly-Found Document in which Holds Eyewitness Account of Jesus Performing Miracle.” Then there’s Bill Maher’s movie Religulous, which cites the infamous movie Zeitgeist. A movie driven by baseless conspiracies theories that attempt to “discredit Christianity.”

I guess if you give a funny guy a TV show and a large budget he then becomes, to his fans, a credible scholar that lead to videos such as this…

At 6:29 in the video she says that these claims in which disprove Christianity was “the straw that broke the camels back” and the “she felt lied to…” I’m not doubting she was lied to by the Church, but I do want to acknowledge that she was also lied to by whoever presented this information to her. I love hearing well-informed responses that attempt to respectfully refute Christianity, but in this video she is very respectful but not well-informed.

The only source I could find, outside of google, was from Bart Ehrman’s who says the claims come from “Timothy Freke and Peter Gandy, The Jesus Mysteries: Was the “Original Jesus” a Pagan God?” It should be stated that Ehrman is an agnostic, whom is not defending Christianity so much as he is defending scholarship by encouraging one provide evidence to such bold claims. I also emailed a couple professors one here at Princeton who echo similar sentiments as Ehrman.

“The authors provide no evidence for their claims concerning the standard mythology of the godmen. They cite no sources from the ancient world that can be checked. It is not that they have provided an alternative interpretation of the available evidence. They have not even cited the available evidence. And for good reason. No such evidence exists [2].” – Bart D. Ehrman

Although, I must admit this is fun stuff to talk or hypothesize about… but so is reading Dan Brown’s book The Da Vinci Code.

I hope it’s apparent that none of us need a formal degree in order to make bold statements or seemingly outlandish statements. Neither do I believe that we should ignore “mythicists” or every single outlandish claim, deeming it or them false because “scholarship” has yet to recognize it as credible.

Just as I’m against a Christian blindly believing in a Jesus being God without any thought or reason [formal or not], I’m also against anyone [atheist, agnostic, or ____ fill in the blank] watching a couple YouTube videos or “documentaries” on Netflix and immediately regurgitating it as truth.

Here’s a couple articles to check out on that Bible:

Christian Post: Turkey’s 1500 Year Old Bible

Huffington Post: Vatican Requestions 1500 Year Old Bible From Turkey

Salon: Muslim Gospel Excites Da Vinci Code Conspiracists

[1] This is not to say that simply because scholars do not acknowledge certain topics as truth that they then are not truth. Galileo, anyone?

[2] Excerpt From: Bart D. Ehrman. “Did Jesus Exist? – The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth.”

Previous Post

October 5, 2014

Pentecostalism and Spiritual Abuse

Next Post

October 14, 2014 The Cost of Leaving Christianity

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Book Reviews Books Buzzfeed Christian Church Church Culture Dating Dechurched eXvangelical Guest Post Humor Inspirational Justice LGBTQ Life Marriage Media Millennials Mini Post Monday Money Podcast Politics Race Reason Relationships Science Sex Socioeconomic Theology Theology Uncategorized Video Wednesday Youth Ministry

Select a Month June 2020 March 2020 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 January 2013 December 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

How many clean animal pairs were in Noah's Ark?

Select your answer to see how you score.

6 7 5 3

Support this
Column