Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

American Buddhist Perspectives

Home
About

Home
Buddhist
Religion News
Does this Comment Spark Joy?

Does this Comment Spark Joy?

Last updated on: February 22, 2019 at 2:51 pm by Justin Whitaker

Does this Comment Spark Joy? 2019-02-22T14:51:01-07:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Can we “Marie Kondo” our Facebook feed?

Last month, my wife and I sat down to watch some of the Netflix show Tidying Up with Marie Kondo. We made it about 60% through an episode before giving up. The premise, based on the practice of KonMari, is great, but the reality show format became a bit much. My sister worked in reality TV for a number of years and gave me some insight into the way that they ‘skilfully’ manufacture outrage and drama.

In Buddhism we often talk about getting “hooked” on these emotions. Now when I see myself grabbing that hook, I pull away. Mind you, I often don’t see it, at least not before it’s too late.

This brings us to the topic of getting hooked on online drama and debate.

I’ve had countless friends bemoan the atmosphere of discussion on Facebook and/or Twitter in the last year or so. Many people have made headlines for leaving, often due to harassment or simply a sense that social media was not benefiting their mental or spiritual well-being. Others just avoid it because the level of discourse is so poor.

So I’ve undertaken an ongoing experiment in removing certain comments (read below for background and philosophy).

Reasons I might remove a comment:

It actively diverts the discussion. I post about blue skies; you see this as a chance to lobby against the coal industry. Perhaps (definitely in this case) I agree with you, but this just isn’t the place or time for that particular discussion.
Your comment seems snarky or just a throw-away. Again, I might agree with the substance of your message, but it might also be the kind of comment that I worry will lead others to shy away from a more substantive conversation.
Any attacks on a person. And of course anything worse such as racism, sexism, hate speech, etc…

Background

In an online group I help manage, we’ve had several discussions around how to best deal with offensive comments and repeatedly difficult people. One of those, who I’ll just call PB, offered an air of superiority in many conversations, insulting and demeaning other group members, and quickly insisting that he was the victim in their interactions. Buddhists are famous for their compassion, often to the point of stupidity. So we worked with him. We had one-on-one chats with him. We read about special techniques for handling difficult people and tried those out.

Then we removed him from the group.

And the group lit up. Suddenly the innocuous posts just remained innocuous, others with serious discussion stayed on topic, and the moderators could spend time deepening connections with other members and reflecting on the philosophy of the group.

Front Porch Philosophy

Around the same time, I discussed with friends on facebook the idea of having a “front porch philosophy” when it comes to my social media spaces. Imagine your social media world as a collection of front porches. Yours is your own. You furnish it with what you like: cat videos perhaps, political news, witty observations about your day, diet updates, whatever.

The important aspect of this is that if a person leaves something on your porch that you don’t like – for whatever reason – you can remove it.

Photo by Ostap Senyuk on Unsplash

Other people can come along to your porch and can add to that: commentary on your witty thoughts, additional news you should read, more cat videos, you get the picture.

That’s great. That’s social media working at its finest.

But then we all know those people, like PB mentioned above, who loom like dark clouds in our social media spheres. Maybe they’re a racist uncle, maybe a joyless distant friend, maybe someone you don’t even know in real life but just know through friends of friends, but who nonetheless has opinions about all of the stuff on your porch. (Perhaps we’re that person!)

On my own social media I swear I’ve received comments from people I barely know who were either really drunk or who had just not had adequate coffee yet. It can be hard to tell which. These are often just one or two words of derision. I tend to think of these as unreflective emotive ejaculations: “dumb!” “whatever!” “idiot!” “please!” How does one even respond to this?

A friend of mine, by all means a thoughtful, kind, compassionate left-of-center person, at the passing of George H.W. Bush, posted something remotely positive about something the late president had done or said. I only arrived at his facebook feed in the aftermath, but he had to clearly state: I’ve had to block a person for refusing to be respectful on this thread, I’m not interested in a lengthy debate, be nice.

I worry that this kind of atmosphere is what is driving some kind, thoughtful people from social media, which just leaves more room for the bombastic ejaculative reactionaries.

This is different from comments that add to the conversation in constructive ways, perhaps saying “this article you shared is problematic here and here, why not try this one at …” Or, “have you thought of this other perspective on this issue…?”

We can do that on social media, you know? And, often enough, we do. In general it is a matter of gauging the mood of a room. Kind of like stepping onto someone’s porch. Do they like having arguments about the furniture? Do you even know them? Is this a light-hearted conversation that you are being way too serious in? Is it a serious discussion that you are being way too flippant in?

So I’ve experimented with just deleting comments that in no way spark joy for me (I didn’t have that language at the time, but it seems fitting now). Here is an explainer video for those who don’t know how to do that. And lo and behold, it has tidied up my social media world – or at least ensured that what is there brings me joy.

On one of my facebook pages, a man insisted that Christine Blasey Ford was “clearly benefiting from coming forward” as she did: delete. On an article about a Buddhist marine I posted, someone wrote, “this is terrible journalism”, delete.

I suppose I should say thank you before clicking that button.

From now on, I will.

And I’ll share this as a comment on the thread.

Previous Post

January 23, 2019

Anonymous redditor shares troubling experience in Shambhala Buddhism

Next Post

February 8, 2019 Petition: Shambhala Buddhism Students seek to split from "authoritarian" structure

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz