Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

American Buddhist Perspectives

Home
About

Home
Buddhist
Religion News
Similes for Buddhist Ethics: the traffic-light by Ven. Ajahn Brahm

Similes for Buddhist Ethics: the traffic-light by Ven. Ajahn Brahm

Last updated on: November 28, 2017 at 12:26 pm by Justin Whitaker

Similes for Buddhist Ethics: the traffic-light by Ven. Ajahn Brahm 2017-11-28T12:26:33-07:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

In teaching and understanding Ethics in the West, it might be an apt generalization to say that we tend to use thought experiments. The oldest one that I know of is in Plato’s Republic, the Ring of Gyges. The experiment asks the listener to imagine a magic invisibility ring and asks whether any person could be so virtuous as to avoid using it for merely selfish gain. The argument, suggested by the interlocutor Glaucon, is that morality is a social construct and that free from social bonds, even a seemingly virtuous person would become overcome by vice.

Image via pixabay.

More famous and recent ones include the trolley problem and case of lying to the Nazi (or other would-be murderer) who is looking for their would-be victim who you have hidden away in your home.

Buddhist ethics

In Buddhist ethics, we tend to hear and use similes instead. It might be worth exploring this further: are there many thought experiments in the history of Buddhism? Are there just as many similes to be found in Western ethics? Is this an aspect of Buddhism that fits more into our category of ‘religion’ than ‘philosophy’? The lay precepts themselves are sikkha-pada, training principles. The simile of taming one’s mind is used, as are perhaps countless others. The popular site for Theravadin Buddhism, which includes free translations of much of the Pali canon, Access to Insight, offers a lengthy index of similes ranging from ‘acrobats’ to ‘wounds, dressing’ and ‘wounded man wandering in the jungle’.

As Buddhism enters the 21st century, new similes will likely make more sense for expressing the same meanings.

One such 20th/21st century simile for the 5 lay precepts comes from Ajahn Brahm, in this 2013 talk on Buddhist ethics. He couches the story in the context of lying. Should the precept be held firmly, absolutely, dogmatically? Are there times when someone really should lie, even according to Theravadin orthodoxy?

Can lying be morally correct?

This should start at 37:15, but you can skip ahead to 38:20 for “the one case” when lying might have been the right thing to do.

https://youtu.be/AVNOuRud2wc?t=37m15s

The story, in brief, is of a woman whose husband is in the hospital for a heart bypass surgery. He befriends the man next to him who is going in before him. The man, unbeknownst to him, dies in surgery – but his wife finds out. As he is going off to surgery he asks her how his friend is doing and… she lies. She feels bad, but thought that telling him the truth in this weakened state might have pushed him over the edge.

Ajahn Brahm agrees. This might be an okay time to tell a lie. The moral of the story isn’t that it’s okay to lie sometimes; but rather that only very rarely and in extraordinary circumstances like this is it okay to lie.

At 41:00 he explains.

The 5 precepts aren’t there to make decisions for you. That would be profoundly unBuddhist, taking away your freedom and responsibility. Instead they guide you.

They are like red traffic lights.

Image via pixabay.

In normal life, when you come to a red light, you always should stop. However, there are exceptions, such as medical emergencies. Then, you should run through every red light. But, he further warns, when you’re running through the red light, you should still pause and use caution. Because when you run a red light you risk causing extreme harm, perhaps hurting more people than you were hoping to help.

He applies this to the question of abortion which, like any taking of life, should be seen as a red light. But, he further states, the precept is not a moral absolute, a thou-shalt. Think about the intentions in the act, the hopes for the future, and whether running that red light might be necessary and in this case most helpful. Euthanasia is the same, he says. This is a taking of life, which goes against the precept. But it might be necessary and good to do that.

“Be careful, tread carefully in these places,” he concludes, noting that these decisions are often weighty and a seemingly ‘wrong’ action will be better met with compassion and understanding than judgment and finger-wagging.

What do you think?

Support independent coverage of Buddhism by joining a community of fellow learners/practitioners at Patreon.
‘Like’ American Buddhist Perspectives on facebook.

Previous Post

October 26, 2017

Explore Buddhism (and more) in India this new year

Next Post

November 12, 2017 Meditations on Communities and Gratitude

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz