Defeating a Demagogue: Donald Trump, Stephen Colbert, and some Buddhist thought on Politics

Last updated on: October 8, 2016 at 12:55 pm by Justin Whitaker

Defeating a Demagogue: Donald Trump, Stephen Colbert, and some Buddhist thought on Politics 2016-10-08T12:55:17-06:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Buddhist teacher Ethan Nichtern has an excellent article over at Lion’s Roar, a handy “guide” to the current US election. It is a guide indeed, as it gives more than a simple single command or opinion. It takes readers through six options, taking into consideration that swing state voters have different roles and obligations in the election. These options, in brief, are:

Vote for Hillary Clinton
Vote for Donald Trump by staying home (in a swing state)
Vote for Donald Trump by voting for Gary Johnson (in a swing state)
Vote for Donald Trump by voting for Jill Stein (in a swing state)
– and this is where it gets particularly interesting: Vote for THE NEXT Donald Trump via any of the three above in a non-swing state
Vote for Donald Trump

While the conclusion is a definite “choose option 1 above,” the argumentation is aimed at those voters who are either planning to stay home on election day or vote for a 3rd party. The reasoning around option #5 is that this election can be seen as an opportunity to not only elect Hillary Clinton, but also to defeat a racist, nationalist, Islamophobic, misogynist demagogue. And the goal here is not just to defeat him by a small margin, but to defeat him so soundly that it prevents future Donald Trumps from even trying to rise to power. As Nichtern writes: “The closer the popular vote gets in this election, the more emboldened fascism will become. In 2020, or 2024, with the media’s current business model, we are in huge trouble, unless we give fascism a decisive defeat right now.”

While many Buddhists may be skeptical of Clinton, noting her ties to spreading fracking, violence in the Muslim world, and Wall Street, informal surveys here (the latest will be reported on Oct 12) suggest a steady move toward supporting her and national polls show very slow but steady move in her direction as well. Nichtern also points out the misogyny inherent in many of our judgments of Hillary Clinton. This is something all voters should keep in mind.

Last May, Zen Buddhist teacher Brad Warner also shared his views on Buddhism and politics, writing:

I am definitely not a “conservative Buddhist.”

But I am concerned whenever I see any mixing of religion and politics. When I was a youngster I was aghast at seeing Christianity mixed with conservative politics, with the implication that Jesus himself wanted you to vote Republican. If we respond to that with the equivalent of, “No! Buddha wants you to vote Democrat!” I don’t see how that’s any better.

I understand when Buddhists are concerned with issues like militarism and global climate change. These are urgent matters that affect all of us. It’s just that it rankles me to see people representing themselves as the “leaders” of Buddhism and presenting their views as if they are the consensus views of all Buddhists.

…

What bugs me is when it appears that liberal, left-leaning Buddhists are trying to mix Buddhism with their political agenda in precisely the same way people like Pat Robertson mix Christianity with their conservative political agenda. This just makes us all look bad to everyone except lefty types who already agree with whatever cause is being espoused. Nobody is going to be convinced to change their views on militarism or global warming because they saw a photo of a bunch of weirdos in costumes they associate with cult members holding a banner outside of the White House. It’s an exercise in vanity, which can only serve to help entrench people’s previously established views.

On this issue I side with Nichtern, who wrote that, “I don’t buy the strange premise that spiritual thinkers should stay silent during elections. In fact, I believe the opposite. Living in democracy requires us to participate in shared decisions of leadership.”

This necessarily means some mixing of religion and politics is necessary, but in a very particular way. Religion – in the form of religious people – can and should be involved in politics – the work of governing our democracy. This requires discussion, the art of pondering, exchanging, and challenging reasons.

However, religious argumentation (e.g. Buddha said… therefore we should…) can be fairly ineffective insofar as it presupposes a particular orientation (e.g. willingness to follow whatever the Buddha said). However, religious thinkers and leaders do no service by spending years or decades cultivating moral sensitivity and then simply bottling it up when it comes to issues beyond their own sense of well-being. While the Pat Robertsons out there garner political power, there are also the Jimmy Carters, Fr. Daniel Berrigans, Fr. John F. Kavanaughs, Stephen Colberts (who is a Sunday School teacher among other things), Cornel Wests, Gene Robinsons, and others who have little problem mixing their faith and their liberal “political agendas” to borrow Warner’s words (look up “Christian Left” – or see a handly list of leaders here). The comparison is imperfect, of course, as Robertson is a preacher first and a political activist second, while many of those I name have other primary positions; but all are people “of faith” on the liberal end of the political spectrum.

It’s true that the Christian Right has a brighter spotlight and has for years, but does this mean that the Christian Left (and lefties in other religions) should hide in the shadows?

As an educator and lover of wisdom, I hope Nichtern’s points spur debate and draw out some conservative Buddhists to share their views. I’d rather have them and others put forth their ideas for scrutiny, where they can possibly change our minds or in turn be changed by better arguments, than to likewise hide in shadows.

Speaking of one of those mentioned above, ordained minister Stephen Colbert reacts to the latest Trump video (warning, some very un-Sunday School teacher language):

Buddhism

American Buddhism

Politics

Previous Post

October 7, 2016

King’s College London - Buddhist Studies Research Seminars

Next Post

October 9, 2016 The Buddha intervenes in a Political Dispute thinking "it is my duty..."

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz