“Our Buddhist University and the Role of Intellectualism in our Studies” a Call for Papers

Last updated on: September 22, 2016 at 3:15 pm by Justin Whitaker

“Our Buddhist University and the Role of Intellectualism in our Studies” a Call for Papers 2016-09-22T15:15:08-06:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University, Bangkok, Thailand (Photo by Justin Whitaker 2012)

The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Universities (IABS), based in Bangkok, has issued a call for papers today examining the role of intellectualism in Buddhist studies. The key questions posed for the upcoming edition of the journal are:

In your Buddhist University or Buddhist Studies Program, what is the role of intellectualism within your program? How is intellectualism promoted or prohibited? Some professors promote critical thinking skills within their studies, some professors ensure their students are better prepared for future endeavors – what are your contributions to Buddhist Studies? How have you made the genre of Buddhist Studies a better place for everyone, your students and any lasting legacy? What are other Buddhist universities or programs doing for the benefit of the academic genre of Buddhist Studies – do they have liberal learning curriculum where students can select their own courses or must they participate in a set program, which cannot be deviated from where students must learn the same thing, in the same style – where creativity is frowned upon?

Further, they seek exploration on the theme of “Cultural Implications of Critical Thinking,” which was the topic of another Thai journal, Manusya (2001). With the question of whether Buddhism (or anything not stemming from Platonic thought) counts as philosophy again being asked – and loudly answered, again and again – this topic presents itself as especially timely. A writer in the above-mentioned Manusya journal notes that concerns exist, “that Asian cultures may be inhospitable to critical thinking, possibly due to the ‘very high esteem’ in which teachers are held” (Evans p.80, citing the call for papers).

In responding to this concern, Evans suggests that critical thinking is a matter of creative engagement with current history:

The key, of course, is the structure of the engagement. To be critical, the activity can be neither a retreat into local custom nor an enthusiastic embrace of whatever is perceived to be the dominant culture. To think and act critically means to stand creatively within the tensions among one’s own culture, the other cultures and the emergent culture of the tensions, it means effecting the breach within the historical situation. (p.93)

Given this definition, Evans suggests that Asian cultures are quite capable of critical thinking, even when it does not ‘look like’ what many in the West would expect. He notes that criticisms of Asian culture are not restricted to them; as some people criticized the hippies on the grounds that their ‘non-conformity’ did not include non-conformity toward one another. The criticism, Evans rightly notes, misses the point. While Asian cultures typically hold teachers in high esteem, this does not mean that failed teachers or thoughts fraught with scandal are immune to public censure. And while Buddhists in Asia have been criticized as non-confrontational to even despotic regimes, one need look no further back than the “Saffron Revolution” in Burma (Myanmar) in 2007 to see that this is not strictly the case.

As for my own conclusions that Asians are plenty capable of critical thought and being philosophers in a very thorough sense, you can read one of my older articles on the topic, such as this one from 2013: Buddhism: religion or philosophy?

For articles from the IABU on Buddhist Critical Thinking Skills, see their 2013 Journal.

And for a very current discussion of multicultural philosophy (with conversation of the above-mentioned article on non-Platonic traditions), see this storify by Bryan W. Van Norden:

The Debate over Multicultural Philosophy https://t.co/mgITSQIDIL

— Bryan W. Van Norden (@BryanVanNorden) September 15, 2016

Deadline for submissions to the journal: 24 February 2017
E-mail questions and final papers to the IABU Manager: [email protected]. Papers will be peer-reviewed and published (by Mahachulalongkornrajavidyalaya University Press) as soon as possible, following the deadline and administrative procedures.

Previous Post

September 18, 2016

Dalai Lama: There is no "Muslim Terrorist" or "Buddhist Terrorist"

Next Post

September 22, 2016 Donald Trump technically owes Barack Obama a $5 million donation, Dalai Lama weighs in Trump's hair and "little mouth"

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz