Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

American Buddhist Perspectives

Home
About

Home
Buddhist
Religion News
Buddhism and Modern Psychology : week five, looking at meditation

Buddhism and Modern Psychology : week five, looking at meditation

Last updated on: May 5, 2014 at 8:27 pm by Justin Whitaker

Buddhism and Modern Psychology : week five, looking at meditation 2014-05-05T20:27:18-06:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Following the trend from the last couple weeks, I’m once again behind on notes (in fact week six has come and gone too). So I apologize to anyone who has followed along with the videos and these posts; but perhaps this can serve as a welcome reminder.

Speaking of reminders, last week (week four) we looked at some modular theories of the mind, which seem to be in vogue in modern psychology circles, and how they may affirm the central Buddhist tenet of not-self. In week three we looked into the Buddhist teaching on not-self and what that might mean in the world of modern psychology.

Now that we’ve seen it suggested that the modular theory of the mind dovetails with the Buddhist theory of not-self, we look at how meditation might fit in to our picture.

The first way this is discussed comes by looking at the Default Mode Network, which is the part of the brain that is active when our mind isn’t focused on anything. Brain scans have shown that meditation quiets this network. This “quieting down” process, Prof. Wright suggests, allows for greater first-person clarity about the wandering of the mind and, most importantly, a greater clarity and thus control over the feelings that arise based on certain wanderings of the mind. Feelings, we saw last week, trigger modules, which then actually change our perception of the world and our choices. This might look something like:

Stimulus (either internal via memory or external) –> without mindfulness –> thoughtless reactivity

Stimulus (either internal via memory or external) –> with mindfulness –> a meaningful choice on how to respond.

After some discussions of ‘self’ (hint, there still isn’t one) and addictions (cases where a particular module is short-circuiting the mindfulness process), Prof. Wright returned to a general picture of how the modules of mind interact to lead to our choices. How does one module take over? In part we look to evolution, which would have strengthened modules that lead to reproduction, caloric intake, and perhaps simple sense-stimulation. However, of course, in the modern environment, we need modules that temper these. We need self-control (self-less control?), and sometimes this needs to be developed.

So Wright turns again to Judson Brewer (see the video at bottom for more from him), who used mindfulness meditation to help smokers quit. When feelings of craving arise, Brewer taught his subjects a practice of Recognition, Allowing, Investigation, and Noting (RAIN). In talking with Wright, Brewer makes the connection with the Buddhist understanding of clinging:

And, and [Buddhists] actually describe clinging … another translation over upādāna which is translated as clinging is also sustenance or fuel. So in essence you’re fueling that fire every time you act on a craving. And so what we teach people to do is just be with the craving, notice that it’s physical sensations in their body. And you know mental restlessness or whatever and if they don’t act on it, they don’t fuel it and they don’t feed it… If you stop adding fuel to a fire it eventually goes out.

Translated into the language of operant conditioning, Wright hypothesizes that mindfulness then allows us to weaken certain modules (such as hate or unhealthy cravings) through reinforcing other modules – by making meaningful choices not to simply react to hateful/craving impulses as they arise.

So, wrapping up video 2:

The Default Mode Network can be viewed as different modules vying for your attention
By being mindful of feelings we can, in principle, have power over which modules we go with
Through this we can control long-term development of modules.

Video three begins with the suggestion that Buddhist meditation is a mystical experience, based on a definition by William James. For James, such an experience is 1) noetic – meaning we learn something through it, and 2) ineffible – meaning that we cannot express this insight in words.

So naturally, Prof. Wright went out and asked a meditator to describe his experience with not-self. Rodney Smith offered this:

In words, [LAUGH] which already throws me way off – stillness. There was no contention, okay? And therefore, it was a, there, it felt, stillness was not a contained state. It was infinite. Infinite stillness, because there was no distance. Infinity comes into play when there isn’t any distance. It’s the only time it comes into play. So when there is no object that is counter to yourself, or yourself that is counter to an object, then there is infinity. So I would say infinity, I would say stillness, and, and universal awareness.

Wright then turns to Joseph Goldstein to ask about thoughts in the context of meditation. Goldstein gives an exercise: imagine the thoughts that arise in the mind as originating from the person next to you – not yourself. Note how you can now see that the identification with thought is a secondary step. Thoughts rise and fall like sounds, but identifying with one is something else. And as you might expect, this brings Wright back to the modular theory of the mind.

Thoughts trigger modules, which then take over for a period until some other module takes over in directing thoughts, actions, and even perceptions. Leda Cosmides is brought back to re-state this finding, saying:

There’s always some psychological mechanism doing something. It’s creating our experience of the world. It’s creating our perception of the world. it, it, that’s why I wouldn’t say that domain specific mechanisms color our perceptions, I’d say that they create our perceptions. But there’s no such thing as perceiving the world in a way that doesn’t involve carving it in some, carving it conceptually into pieces.

There is, to quote the philosopher Thomas Nagel, no “view from nowhere.“

Prof. Wright speaks with Joseph Goldstein about self, thoughts, and meditation (screenshot from video 3).

And here are week five’s office hours, where he confronts the age-old debate about whether cats or dogs have more Buddha nature, along with some of the ins and outs of evolutionary psychology:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mXitMgYcS5Q

Judson Brewer on flow, self, and achieving mastery:

Previous Post

May 2, 2014

For May Day: A Pacifist Anarchist Catholic Saint

Next Post

May 4, 2014 Dalai Lama Awakening, a Q&A with Director Khashyar Darvich

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz