Islamophobic 969 Movement Faces Prohibition in Burma

Last updated on: September 11, 2013 at 8:42 am by Justin Whitaker

Islamophobic 969 Movement Faces Prohibition in Burma 2013-09-11T08:42:11-06:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Wimala Biwuntha shows a 969 logo during the introduction speech ceremony in a monastery in Rangoon. Photo: REUTERS/Soe Zeya Tun

It appears that the much maligned “Buddhist Terrorist” organisation known mostly for its charismatic leader U Wirathu and its use of the 969-logo (referring to the 9 attributes of the Buddha, 6 of the Dharma, and 9 of the Sangha) may be on the way out in Burma.

According to the Irrawaddy, in a directive dated to August 14, the State Sangha Maha Nayaka Committee (SSMNC),a government oversight committee composed of high ranking monks ruled that the 969 movement’s teachings do not abide by its standards, deeming any networks of 969 movement monks to be illegal and barring any further connection of the 969 movement logo to Buddhism.

The ruling was unanimous among the 47 leading monks of the SSMNC.

Speaking on behalf of 969 from Mandalay, the monk U Khemasarah said, “We don’t take part in political affairs, steal others’ possessions, attack or lie to others. So you cannot say we violate the ethics of a Buddhist monk. We just make our special efforts in order to preserve our race and religion.”

If he had just added “at the expense of other races and religions in our country” the point might have been a little clearer, even to him. The 969 movement is a Buddhist nationalist organization based in Burma. It currently feeds off of the mix of opening freedoms there and historic racial/religious tensions with Muslims. Like many instances of religious chauvinism and hate, the organization is wrapped in the pious cloth of nationalist self-defence and the upholding of it’s own religious -in this case, Buddhist- principles.

While Muslims, Christians, and the dominant Buddhists have lived peacefully side-by-side in many cities and towns in Burma for long periods of time, violence instigated along religious grounds is not uncommon there (or in other predominantly Buddhist countries such as Thailand, Sri Lanka, etc.). If the ruling stands and the 969 Movement’s legitimacy is wiped out in Burma, it would mark a rather quick (historically speaking) and decisive blow against inter-religious hatred. Some of my recent posts mentioning Burma/969 can be found here:

Buddhism and Violence on the BBC

The globalization of Buddhist anti-Muslim hate? From Burma’s 969 to Australia and the US

Ethnicity, Ideologies, and the unraveling of modern Burma

Burma, Imperialism, and the Buddhist-Muslim violence

Previous Post

September 3, 2013

Community Organizing

Next Post

September 12, 2013 Three great Buddhist projects deserving your support

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz