How Reza Aslan made a book about religion a best-seller and what we can learn from it

Last updated on: August 2, 2013 at 2:40 pm by Justin Whitaker

How Reza Aslan made a book about religion a best-seller and what we can learn from it 2013-08-02T14:40:58-06:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

As an educator in religious studies I was intrigued by Reza Aslan’s book Zealot: the Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth when I first heard about it 2 or 3 weeks ago. I listened to a couple interviews (NPR and HuffPo) and thought, “this is interesting enough, but I don’t know if a) this is really groundbreaking work, or b) this is sound scholarship.”

So I asked some scholars closer to the field and received at best lukewarm responses. I’m not an expert, I haven’t read the book, and this is all second-hand (so take it as such), but the views were that his scholarship is mostly a rehash of perhaps good but dated work, there are factual errors in the book, and I think Dan Brown’s name was brought up as a perhaps better alternative – because at least you know his work is fiction. That said, academics revel in being harsh, especially in private enclaves, and nobody would have even mentioned it if it were completely horrible.

“Oh well,” I thought. On to other things. But then – Aslan blew up! He’s now #1 on Amazon’s best-seller list – bumping J.K. Rowling. Find one religion news source that hasn’t mentioned him and I’ll give you… a big virtual high-five (plus a couple shout-outs from my twitter account about how great you are and/or your favorite charity).

So, watching all of this from my little corner of academia/blogosophere, I thought I’d try to tease out a ‘how to’ based on Aslan’s recent success.

1) Court controversy. Going on Fox News was the best thing Aslan could have done. NPR‘s interview was very, how should I put it? NPR (parodied brilliantly by SNL here). Polite, thoughtful, but bland. The Huffington Post’s version was a bit cooler, aimed at the savvy 20 something who wants to know about religion in a cool way, but it still didn’t do the trick. This… This did the trick:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KofyTQnQ9E

2) Fudge a bit. I’ve already mentioned the factual errors in the book (which I can neither confirm nor deny), but in the above interview Aslan definitely DID fudge a bit when he said that all of the previous interviews had covered his being a Muslim (today). In fact, correct me if I’m wrong, but none of the interviews above, nor his appearance on the The Daily Show, actually contain any discussion of his current faith (it does get mentioned -just briefly- in the online extended interview on TDS). Not that it matters, but saying it was discussed when it wasn’t is a bit of a fudge. His other ‘fudge’ was his claim to have a PhD in the History of Religions (it’s actually in Sociology of Religion and he wrote about Jihadism).

3) Write on something big. Jesus. Need I say more?

4) Start your own media company. www.aslanmedia.com, Wow! I figure I’m a tech savvy academic: I blog, I’m on twitter… but wow, oh wow, Aslan is light-years ahead of me on this. He even has people working for his personal media company. Most professors I know are happy to get a TA to help with a class here or there, let alone something like this:

Screenshot from http://rezaaslan.com/

5) Convert to Islam. While this really shouldn’t make any difference – and in my academic circles this was never brought up – apparently in the right-wing popular press, this is a bright red warning flag (see above interview). In the US at least, there is a phenomenon known as “Christian Privilege.” Atheists certainly get attacked by Fox News pundits, Buddhism gets dismissed, and other religions probably get a treatment somewhere between these two. Only a Muslim is going to be attacked so directly and unceasingly. This might have pleased the conservatives behind Fox News, but it also raised a defensive cry around the world against such bias (at least) and bigotry (at worst). Aslan took it in stride though, and here he talks about how he feels sorry for the Fox News reporter and “feels great” about the interview on MSNBC:

So there it is, a simple, five-step guide to getting a book on religion to the top of the best-seller list.

I’m happy that religious scholarship is having a moment in the spotlight, but I’m also saddened by how it happened. Fudging, even just a bit, risks compromising academic integrity, which is something no academic should knowingly do. Courting controversy is also frowned upon in academia. It’s as if we work on a spectrum ranging from the impossible ideal of perfect objectivity to purely personal opinion. The more we move toward the latter, the more interesting we can get, the more we might be able to connect with readers who share – or perhaps vehemently oppose – our opinions. But it’s the objective work, the boring labor of facts and figures, restating and clarifying old ideas, and presenting them anew that gives us common grounding for our disagreements. Aslan is, I’m told, doing a poor job of putting together the groundwork (evidence) for his new take on Jesus while, it would seem, doing a great job of promoting himself and his work. It’s also sad that his faith was targeted as it was and that this seems to have become the central object of so much discussion around the book. Muslims can and will write great books on Jesus, the Buddha, Confucius and Ronald Reagan if they so choose. This just doesn’t seem to be one of them.

I thought about using some of the Aslan interviews in my class on World Religions to highlight recent scholarship on Christianity – but I’ll pass, sticking with interviews of Bart Ehrman (here and here), who also challenges many Christian presuppositions about Jesus and the Bible. As for the book, I’ll pass on it too. Based on all of the discussions (and here is a great review from The Jesus Blog), the book’s merit is minimal; perhaps its best contribution is in bringing what is often very dry and distant scholarship to a popular audience. As The Chronicle of Higher Education yesterday reported:

Mr. Aslan says that was precisely his goal: “It is a synthesis of a 200-year debate among biblical scholars over who Jesus was and how to understand him in his time and place.” He wrote the book for general readers, he says, because “some of these basic aspects about Jesus are not known.”

Previous Post

July 31, 2013

Quick takes: Technology and why you shouldn't fly an airplane in a moving car

Next Post

August 4, 2013 Ethnicity, Ideologies, and the unraveling of modern Burma

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz