Authentic American Buddhism

Last updated on: May 8, 2010 at 7:41 pm by Justin Whitaker

Authentic American Buddhism 2010-05-08T19:41:00-06:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Elk mount with traditional Tibetan scarf, or khata, from a recent retreat in Wyoming. Very Western (in more ways than one) and very Buddhist.

Several folks recently have brought up the question of authenticity in Western or American Buddhist practice. First, a friend of mine in the UK, Dr. Dave Webster, sent me a prezi he made on Western Buddhism and Authenticity. (If you’re unfamiliar with prezi, click on the ‘more’ tab on the lower right and then click ‘autoplay’) Unfortunately, without audio or text, we just get a sort of framework for discussion and critique of the Western (Buddhist) obsession with – or quest for – authenticity.

We’re introduced to some of the marketing of ‘Buddhism’ – on t-shirts and in bars, a financial firm called ‘zendough’, and so on. The we careen into neo-Marxist critique by way of the great Slavoj Žižek. Žižek criticizes Western Buddhism as a fetish that allows its adherents to “fully participate in the frantic pace of the capitalistic game, while sustaining the perception that you are not really in it… [focusing instead on] the inner Self to which you know you can always return.”

To my mind this completely mis-characterizes Western Buddhism (reminiscent of similar colonialist accounts of Buddhism in Asia) as pathetically inactive and subservient. You’ll have to see the prezi and some of Žižek’s works for a fuller analysis, but even if he is way off the mark in general, there is some truth in his critique that deserves attention. While I doubt many people live up to Žižek’s standards of fighting the “frantic pace of the capitalistic game,” everyone would do well to re-evaluate his/her participation in oppressive systems – be they economic, racial, gender based or otherwise.

Next, Amod Lele over at Love of All Wisdom has several intriguing posts around this topic (here, here, and here). His attention is more focused on academics and the way that textual study of religion has been criticized in recent years in favor of archeological and anthropological explorations. He cites Gregory Schopen as one such critic (see video below). I commented on his blog, so I’ll just say read the posts, you won’t regret it. The first two made me seriously reconsider calling myself a student of “Buddhism” – read them and the comments and you’ll see why.

Finally, Kyle brought to my attention an interesting review concerning Buddhism in Canada at his blog, the Reformed Buddhist. In the article, the reviewer chastises the contributors of the book for perhaps being over sensitive to Asian Buddhists in Canada and unduly critical to Converts. Some excerpts:

[T]here is a streak of political correctness running through Wild Geese, which tends to paint Canadian “Westerners” as haughty colonialists and Asian immigrants as virtuous victims of European-rooted bigotry.

[O]ne quibble with Wild Geese is that it contributes to that “overly positive stereotype” by acting as if Asian forms of Buddhism are generally beyond criticism, while lobbing shots at Westerners and their proclivity toward cultural imperialism…

My minor beef is that while Wild Geese’s writers validly suggest that Western converts to Buddhism are often blithely dismissive of the religion’s Asian manifestations, the authors themselves seem blind to the possibility the charge of being disrespectful could be made in reverse.

Terrified by the possibility they could be accused of being unfair to immigrants, the book’s contributors seem unwilling to contemplate that some ethnic Asian Buddhists could be just as adept at creating an “us” against “them” mentality as any Westerner.

We’ll have to read the book to find out how true these allegations are, but they do raise the question of authenticity in Western Buddhist practice. How do we accurately describe various and often contradicting Buddhist practices and beliefs without a) dragging in our own prejudices and presuppositions and/or b) inevitably offending someone?

Oh wait, there’s one more! Jayarava over at Jayarava’s Raves gives us his thoughtful take on “What is Buddhism?” Very much worth a read. His conclusion, like my last post on the Perfections, returns us to the teachings of the Buddha for some of the basic tools of awakening:

‘Buddhism’ is anything that genuinely leads to positive results as defined by the Buddha, i.e. anything that leads to: dispassion, detachment, divestment, satisfaction, contentment, solitude, invigoration, helpfulness. Of course we don’t really need a text to tell us this, or to justify our practice to others if we feel we are genuinely practising, but I find it useful to show that even the conservative Theravādins preserved a tradition of openness and innovation.

I think all of this points to a general Buddhist (not just Western, Buddhists have been arguing about authenticity from the start), and perhaps human, fascination with Authenticity. We want the ‘true’ teachings, the ‘true’ practices, real food (not edible food-like substances), and so on. The obvious question is: Why? One answer is: because it works. Authentic food is better for you/the environment in the long run and authentic teachings and practices really work. But I think there is a better answer. And that is that Authentic items put us in touch with the Dharma, and authentic activities ‘partake’ in the Dharma in a way that inauthentic items and activities cannot.

Inauthentic activities are those rooted in ego (delusion); such as those based on the belief that one has a Self to withdraw to – to return to Žižek’s criticism. This notion of roots and a return to our own mental states as Jayarava points out, suggests a more inwardly directed – though outwardly manifested – rationale for seeking authenticity. And authenticity is not simply one good amongst many for Buddhists, but it is the ultimate consequence sought. For complete authenticity would entail a life in full harmony with the Dharma, that is, an awakened life.

And so, good Buddhists, and the not so good ones, will surely continue to debate authenticity.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 8, 2010

Perfections

Next Post

May 12, 2010 He seemed . . . almost . . . Buddhist.

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz