A Buddhist Philosopher?

Last updated on: May 20, 2010 at 10:29 pm by Justin Whitaker

A Buddhist Philosopher? 2010-05-20T22:29:00-06:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

They deem me mad because I will not sell my days for gold; and I deem them mad because they think my days have a price. — Kahlil Gibran

How would you describe a Buddhist Philosopher? Or would you?

Simon Critchley, of the famously leftist New School, wrote an excellent article thie seek, “What is a Philosopher?” Discussing Plato’s Theaetetus, he determines that the “philosopher is the person who has time or who takes time.”

I love the definition, and Critchley’s discussion, like Plato’s, is quite appropriate for where I find myself in the world. Working on a doctorate, I find myself explaining regularly that it isn’t something to be ‘knocked out’ in a chunk at a time. It’s not a 9-5 where I can turn on the productive process in the morning and then turn it off after several productive hours to return to domestic life.

However, as Amod Lele well states in his discussion of Critchley at LoveofallWisdom, much of the contemporary philosopher’s life has been reduced to another mode of production. Since there is basically no money in ‘corrupting the youth’ as Socrates did, in order to do philosophy today one is forced into the factory of impressing professors, battling into a ‘good’ school, and exiting with a tenure track position, at which you are forced to ‘publish or perish’ madly for about five to seven years, all the while teaching three or four courses, adjusting to new environs, departmental politics, and… all at the age in which our biology is telling us to pair off and produce children.

So, in a word, the contemporary philosophy profession has become anti-philosopher. One who takes time today will too often confront the (pseudo-) truth that time is money and universities are getting less and less of the latter.

All of this is why, about seven years ago, I began to veer away from philosophy as a profession. While I was talented in analytic philosophy at the time, I didn’t really like it, preferring the holistic and engaged nature of continental thought far more. When I explained this to my advisor, a friendly old analytic philosopher, he chuckled and said I could go into continental philosophy, but I’d never find a job. And in either field, a strong interest in Buddhism, or any Asian thought, was looked down upon (I think this is still true today, but hopefully slowly changing).

So instead I went to Bristol to study Buddhism and found myself learning from three brilliant philosophers: Paul Williams, Rupert Gethin, and John Peacock (not philosophers in a narrow sense but in the wider ‘love of wisdom’ sense). Peacock can be seen here lecturing at a recent conference in Oxford. It was, I must say, still probably the happiest year of my life – certainly at least in terms of doing philosophy. Then I returned to Montana to study more philosophy – this time in the philosophy department. I had intended on working toward a special “Masters of Arts in Teaching” (M.A.T.), but the department abolished that program in the months between my application and their acceptance letter. I went anyway and did fine – even winning a few awards – but the factory-feeling settled in somewhat and I decided it wasn’t for me.

So I returned to England to study with the world’s foremost Buddhist Ethicist, Damien Keown. Out again from academic philosophy and back again into the ‘love of wisdom’. And while again my productivity has gone down in many ways, my learning and level of life satisfaction have gone immeasurably up.

But is this life of philosophical leisure sustainable? To be honest there is a certain fear in completing my thesis and fully entering the job market. And given Amod’s discussion – he gives links to others who bring it home even more – this fear is not unfounded. I wrote about this a bit in January after dipping my toes in those frigid waters (filled with stats, both optimistic and otherwise). Job offers in my field had plummeted from around 160 in 2007 to just 40 in 2009.

But not all is without hope. Returning to the subject of time, I still have that. How I choose to spend it will determine whether or not I turn out to be a true philosopher, or not.

And in the background, Phish plays:

If time were only part of the equation

Then you could draw the bound’ries of our cage

You wouldn’t pile another stone upon me

And I’d be happy just to watch you age

But everything is in it’s own dominion

And waiting in the shallows as I do

Appeases me as water slowly trickles out

Which isn’t nearly fast enough for you

It isn’t nearly fast enough for you

Its what I was afraid of

I stumble into view

But it isn’t nearly fast enough for you

It isn’t nearly fast enough for you

Uncategorized

Previous Post

May 15, 2010

India-bound

Next Post

May 22, 2010 Batchelor, Ashoka, and other bits from across the web

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz