Canki Sutta – the Buddhist Way of Knowing

Last updated on: November 20, 2008 at 4:07 pm by Justin Whitaker

Canki Sutta – the Buddhist Way of Knowing 2008-11-20T16:07:00-07:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Last night, in a Dharma study group I attend at the local FWBO center, we read and discussed the Canki (pronounced “chunky” like peanut butter) Sutta. What follows is a lengthy but rewarding (I do think) review of the sutta and its meaning for contemporary Buddhists.

The sutta describes a conversation between the Buddha and a very learned young Brahmin on the nature of knowledge: how does one come to know the truth?

The Brahmin, Baradvaja, asserts that it is through his faith in the sacred texts, the Vedas, and the tradition of Brahmins that one can know the truth. But the Buddha shows that each may be in error and thus cannot be trusted in themselves.

“Bharadvaja, first you went by conviction. Now you speak of unbroken tradition. There are five things that can turn out in two ways in the here-&-now. Which five? Conviction, liking, unbroken tradition, reasoning by analogy, & an agreement through pondering views. These are the five things that can turn out in two ways in the here-&-now. Now some things are firmly held in conviction and yet vain, empty, & false… [and so on]” (from accesstoinsight)

‘‘Pubbeva kho tvaṃ, bhāradvāja, saddhaṃ agamāsi, anussavaṃ idāni vadesi. Pañca kho ime, bhāradvāja, dhammā diṭṭheva dhamme dvedhā vipākā. Katame pañca? Saddhā, ruci, anussavo, ākāraparivitakko, diṭṭhinijjhānakkhanti – ime kho, bhāradvāja, pañca dhammā diṭṭheva dhamme dvedhā vipākā…. (from 428 here)

Five unfounded paths to knowledge:

Saddhā: Conviction – or faith (this alone can obviously lead us astray)
Ruci: Liking – ideas or beliefs we take pleasure in
Anussavo: Unbroken Tradition
Ākāraparivitakko: Reasoning by analogy, thought, consideration, etc.
Diṭṭhinijjhānakkhanti: an agreement through pondering in views (diṭṭhi); or “delighting in mere speculation” – as one person at the group mused, “oh, like philosophers?” (which brought a scowl to my forehead and a smile to my mouth)

The Buddha goes on to prescribe a path to the discovery of truth:

Find a teacher – investigate him/her: “in regard to states based on greed, … hatred, … delusion.”

lobhanīyesu dhammesu, dosanīyesu dhammesu, mohanīyesu dhammesu. (430)

Does this teacher, in times of greed (or attraction, lust, strong desire, etc) distort the truth, claim knowledge of the unknown, or stir up similar states in your mind? The same goes for aversion/hatred, and delusion (uncertainty, unclarity). As an aside, that same person wisely noted that she had never met a teacher who seemed perfectly free of distortions based on at least one of these. In humility we ought merely find a teacher with as little distortion as possible, taking to heart that it’s still probably less distortion than we ourselves have.
Once we have carefully seen that the teacher has at least a relatively low degree of lobha,, dosa, and moha, the Buddha prescribes the following action (broken up by me):

“When, on observing that the monk is purified with regard to [these] qualities, he
places conviction in him. With the arising of conviction, he
visits him & grows close to him. Growing close to him, he
lends ear. Lending ear, he
hears the Dhamma. Hearing the Dhamma, he
remembers it. Remembering it, he
penetrates the meaning of those dhammas. Penetrating the meaning, he
comes to an agreement through pondering those dhammas. There being an agreement through pondering those dhammas,
desire arises. With the arising of desire, he
becomes willing. Willing, he
contemplates (lit: “weighs,” “compares”). Contemplating, he
makes an exertion. Exerting himself, he both
realizes the ultimate meaning of the truth with his body and
sees by penetrating it with discernment. (from accesstoinsight)
“To this extent, Bharadvaja, there is an awakening to the truth. To this extent one awakens to the truth. I describe this as an awakening to the truth. But it is not yet the final attainment of the truth.

In the Pāli (my numbering/bolding):

‘‘Yato naṃ samannesamāno visuddhaṃ mohanīyehi dhammehi samanupassati ; atha tamhi (3) saddhaṃ niveseti, saddhājāto (4a) upasaṅkamati, upasaṅkamanto (4b) payirupāsati, payirupāsanto (5) sotaṃ odahati, ohitasoto (6) dhammaṃ suṇāti, sutvā dhammaṃ (7) dhāreti, dhatānaṃ [dhāritānaṃ (ka.)] dhammānaṃ (8) atthaṃ upaparikkhati, atthaṃ upaparikkhato (9) dhammā nijjhānaṃ khamanti, dhammanijjhānakkhantiyā sati (10) chando jāyati, chandajāto (11) ussahati, ussahitvā (12) tuleti, tulayitvā (13) padahati, pahitatto (14) samāno kāyena ceva paramasaccaṃ sacchikaroti paññāya ca (15) naṃ ativijjha passati. Ettāvatā kho, bhāradvāja, saccānubodho hoti, ettāvatā saccamanubujjhati, ettāvatā ca mayaṃ saccānubodhaṃ paññapema; na tveva tāva saccānuppatti hotī’’ti. (432)

The Buddha says this is how the truth (sacca) is discovered. But this is not the end of the journey. To finally arrive at truth, one goes on to,

“The cultivation, development, & pursuit of those very same qualities: to this extent, Bharadvaja, there is the final attainment of the truth. To this extent one finally attains the truth. I describe this as the final attainment of the truth.” (ibid.)

‘‘Tesaṃye , bhāradvāja, dhammānaṃ āsevanā bhāvanā bahulīkammaṃ saccānuppatti hoti. Ettāvatā kho, bhāradvāja, saccānuppatti hoti, ettāvatā saccamanupāpuṇāti, ettāvatā ca mayaṃ saccānuppattiṃ paññapemā’’ti. (433)

Thus we have our directions for finding and arriving at truth: 1) good teacher, 2) learning and pondering a bunch, and 3) continued cultivation, development, and pursuit. This jives well with some readings in Zen I’ve done lately, which say there is no static state of ‘enlightenment’ but rather an ongoing process. Awakening is a verb. It is something we do, not something we become.

But the sutta also challenges us in our common-sense ways of coming to know things. How reliable are they? How much do we trust in mere faith, tradition, or ideas that we find pleasing? Probably more than we’d like to admit! Likewise, how willing are we to patiently investigate a teacher based on his/her relationship with greed, hatred and delusion (avoiding the traps of flowery rhetoric)?

Knowing is not as easy as we would think. Nor is it impossible as some slick-talking postmodernists would try to convince us. It is a matter of work, discipline, sustained effort, and focus. All things of which we today (me at least!!) are in dire need.

And so off I go now into my daily routine: some reading, a noon-lecture, class, and then home to more grading and thesis work, prep for meditation, meditation, philosophy club gathering, sleep. May I keep a mind of truth through much of it, may I hold focus, may I smile and be present for each moment.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

November 20, 2008

Hellgate winds, horny deer, and accomplishing

Next Post

November 25, 2008 Choices: Photos for the show

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz