Musings on Buddhist Ethics

Last updated on: October 12, 2008 at 9:59 pm by Justin Whitaker

Musings on Buddhist Ethics 2008-10-12T21:59:00-06:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Does Buddhism have an ontology or metaphysics?

This past week we at the Center for Ethics at UM hosted David Webster from the University of Gloucestershire. Dave is a philosopher of ethics, religion, and contemporary society and learning. His ph.d. work focused on the nature of desire in the Pali Canon (early Buddhism), stemming from the often asserted and erroneous notion that Buddhism teaches the elimination of desires.

In his second talk at the University he described Buddhism in the academy as a bit of a trouble-maker in the world of comparative religion. Buddhism, he asserted, is not concerned with the same “Big Questions” asked by Western theisms. Western religions, by and large, aim at explaining “why” life, the world, and ourselves are the way they are. Buddhism, however, is more interested in “what” and “how”: what is the nature of life? How do we end all suffering?

Thus, while Western religions have a built-in tendency toward metaphysics, Buddhism is geared toward practical matters. This is seen as so much the case that some have said that Buddhism has no metaphysics, or that it has no ontology (Gombrich).

However, this I think is mistaken, perhaps grossly so. Buddhism definitely has a metaphysics, albeit perhaps a phenomenological one (based on cataloging fundamental dharmas or mental states). And in terms of ontology there is definitely a process-ontology, an anti-substantialism that is meant to be understood not in merely theoretical terms, but as a lived experience. But it is an ontology none the less. As Kenneth Inada stated some 20 years ago:

The perception of the nature of reality in Buddhism is a consequence of the Buddha’s original enlightenment. Failure to recognize this fact has caused many problems in the understanding of Buddhism…. There is no doubt that the content of the
enlightenment revealed a rare philosophic vision of reality.

The words “philosophic vision of reality” would likely make Gombrich and those who think Buddhism is completely anti or non-philosophical cringe. But to me it makes sense. The Buddha, in his day, utilized the philosophy, ontology, ethics, and so on of the (proto) Hindu or Brahmanical world around him. At times he taught to simply use good Hindu common sense: cultivate generosity, follow one’s duty to family and community, and so on. At other times the Buddha turned the Brahmanical worldview on its head.

A favorite such case is that of the Kevatta Sutta in which a monk goes to the highest God, Brahma, to ask where it is that the elements cease without end (where is the edge of the universe?). After asking a couple times, Brahma takes Kevatta aside, out of ear-shot from the lower Gods, and says, roughly, “I don’t know, but don’t tell these other guys… go ask the Buddha, he knows.”

So the Buddha at times incorporated ideas/beliefs and at times discounted them. It makes sense that we would do the same. He did not discount or ignore the belief in Gods, but instead showed their limitations. He re-mapped the cosmos with Gods inside the cycle of samsara rather than outside it. We too, in this age which is less mythic and more philosophical, should engage with the ideas/ideologies of our time. And this means ‘unpacking’ the metaphysics and ontology of Buddhism (even if it may be argued that early Buddhism had little or no metaphysics or ontology).

Metaphysics:

“What really exists? What is mere delusion or illusion? How can we truly know the difference?” These are some of the fundamental questions of metaphysics (although the last one shades strongly into epistemology). The Buddhist third question would more likely be, “how can we move from delusion to reality?”

yatha-bhuta-ñana-dassana — knowledge and vision of things as they [truly] are.

What really exists in Buddhism would likely be four things:

dharma, the totality, the truth, the final nature of all existence
dharmas, mental phenomena –as they are– momentary truths of experience
nirvana, the uncompounted basis of experience free of delusion
suññata, emptiness, the true nature of things

All of the rest, from our existence as individual beings to the teachings themselves (including the words above) are all within conceptual reality, within language and delusion.

Ontology:

Ontology is a branch of metaphysics concerning being in general, existence, and the categorical structure of reality. This too, Buddhism may speak on. I used to have a nifty diagram somewhere that discussed some Buddhist Ontological ideas, but I’ve lost it (anyone know where it is out there in the blog/web-world?).

Fundamentally, Buddhism speaks of a process-ontology, where even the tiniest moments of reality (dharmas) rise and fall like waves on the ocean. And, depending on which school of Buddhist Philosophy you read, even the dharmas are composed of parts (beginning, middle, end) and ultimately are empty – meaning they are essenseless. For more, see the above Kenneth Inada article.

Metaphysics, Ontology, and Ethics:

So what have these to do with Buddhist Ethics? I may have to give a raincheck for a future entry on this, as light is fading and I feel like going for a run – but the jist is that, as Kant declaired a while back, we must understand the underlying nature of reality if we want a system of ethics that isn’t built on shaky foundations. (yea – gotta run) 🙂

Until I return: Simply do good.

Uncategorized

Previous Post

October 11, 2008

Back, visitor, settling, gratitude, writing

Next Post

October 13, 2008 A taste of Glacier National Park

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz