Borderline Personality Disorder and Buddhism

Last updated on: September 30, 2013 at 11:09 am by Justin Whitaker

Borderline Personality Disorder and Buddhism 2013-09-30T11:09:15-06:00 Justin Whitaker

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

– the intersection of chaos and awareness.

Recent studies of mine have veered in a rather new and strange direction these last couple months. While still pursuing my ph.d. in Buddhist Ethics, I have found myself in the midst of the fascinating – and yet in so many ways horrific – world of personality disorders – (wiki it). My own journey has been interesting in many ways (a person very close to me is most likely suffering with BPD), but far more worthy of attention is the disorder itself.

It’s hard to know just where to start in explaining Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). The image below may begin to evoke the raw emotion and pain of a person with this.
But what the image doesn’t show is that people with BPD are often in so many ways just like anyone else – very capable, intelligent, functioning, fun-loving, caring and wonderful human beings. The problem occurs when emotions become intense, which is why BPD is sometimes called a “disease of intimacy.” It may be only in close relationships that ‘symptoms,’ such as those in the image, appear.

The exact causes of BPD are unknown, but sufferers often report a history of childhood abuse, especially sexual, and otherwise difficult early home-lives (many are the children of parents with personality disorders themselves). Of course, abuse and/or ‘crazy’ parents are neither necessary nor sufficient to cause BPD. Studies have suggested that the brains of people with BPD have developed differently than those without it, especially with regards to the limbic system (as I mentioned briefly in my recent post – see footnote).

I don’t know all of the science that well, but due to what could be any combination of genetic pre-disposition, abuse, and/or other environmental factors, the BPD brain is simply less capable of filtering intense emotions – ranging from intense joy (success, promotion, etc) to sorrow or agitation (accusations, criticism, loss…). Non-BPDs suffer these same emotional states, but when we do, our cognitive functions kick in to stabilize us. Our attention to long-term goals/plans balances us out, while BPDs are consumed in the moment-to-moment feelings. Again, I think non-BPDs can empathise – to a degree. I’ve been ‘consumed by emotions’ at times, but I’ve been able to tell myself to go take a bath or a nap or to call a friend or family member and talk it out. But for the BPD person, those thoughts have a much harder time coming through.

For partners, friends, and family this can be incredibly difficult as well. Not only do they see their friend or loved one react eratically to emotions, they can also stumble across ‘triggers’ – seemingly mundane actions or words that trigger a memory of past trauma in the BPD person, sending him/her down an emotional sinkhole. This is so difficult and pronounced in BPD that “A pervasive pattern of instability of interpersonal relationships” is usually the first symptom found in sufferers of BPD.

Treating BPD is likewise very difficult. Like anything, it occurs on a spectrum of severity, but as a whole it is amongst the most resistent to treatment. This is due to two factors: denial and physical damage to the brain. Denial is the most difficult. Most borderlines, even when confronted with the knowledge of having the disorder, will not seek or follow through with treatment. Why this is is not exactly clear.

One reason may be that they have built such an identity as ‘victim’ (which is to some extent correct – given their likely childhood abuse) that they simply cannot see that they are now harming others. Another reason may be that the facts of their behavior, and, more difficultly, the abusive history that has led to it, may be too hard to face. Again, while a borderline maybe extremely functional in day-to-day life, they are incredibly fragile when faced with emotional issues.

And even when denial is overcome, treatment options are still debated. This image shows how health-care professionals in different disciplines all see different aspects of BPD:

All, of course, have some truth. Going around the circle:

The cognitive therapist attempts to correct the patient’s “faulty schema” using “influence and reason to change faulty beliefs, uses homework to generate schema-inconsistent evidence, and uses training to modify self-statements.”*
The psychoanalyst points out the extremes/splitting in the patient’s relations to others, attributing it to disturbances in key developmental stages of the patient’s childhood.
The dialectical behavior therapist (DBT) works on the “emotional dysregulation” that occurs in times of high/low emotion, attempting to develop a “wedge of awareness” amidst the chaos in the BPD person’s mind.
Psyco-pharmacologists see the problems as primarily a lack or imbalance of brain chemicals. None that I’ve read about see this as a ‘solution’ but many will emphasize that antipsychotic and antidepressant medications may help get the patient on his/her feet while therapy provides the skills for the run. Lastly,
Sociologists see the general societal trends involved, asking such things as “why is it mostly women who get BPD?”

The one of these that caught my eye most was Dialectic Behavior Therapy, developed by Dr. Marsha Linehan, a psychologist and Zen practitioner under Father Willigis Jaeger (Ko-un Roshi), a German Benedictine monk, Christian mystic, and Zen master.

I have yet to study it in depth, but it appears that Dr. Linehan’s technique is to combine cognitive behavioral therapy with the mindfulness trainings and skills of Buddhism (and other contemplative traditions). The results are highly promising. While the difficulties in traditional treatments often led BPD to be described as “untreatable,” DBT – Dialectical Behavior Therapy – may achieve an over 85% remission rate with ten years of treatment (meaning the person no longer qualify as ‘borderline’). Ten years is a long time. But living that same ten years without treatment would feel like even longer.

My next step is to study DBT a bit more in depth. I’ve volunteered to give a talk on the topic at the University here for philosophy students and will also give a preview talk to a local Buddhist group. One of the things that has fascinated me as I have begun studying and talking to people about this is the split between those who had never heard of/encountered personality disorders and those who immediately recognize it and have gone through the ‘craziness’ of it themselves or with others.

It is my sincere hope that by talking of my experiences and what I have learned that at least one person out there will recognize this in him/herself or a loved one and, knowing that help is out there, begin the process of healing.

This is part 1 of a series. Click here for part 2, part 3, part 4, and part 5.
* (Comprehensive handbook of cognitive therapy, Freeman, et al 1989, p.175)

Uncategorized

Previous Post

September 15, 2008

Marco Polo and Garrison Kiellor

Next Post

September 18, 2008 A Peaceful Day

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Academia Activism American Buddhism Art Book review Buddhism Buddhism Today Buddhist Ethics Burma/Myanmar China Christianity Commodification Environment Gender Happiness Health Humor India Interfaith Islam Japanese Buddhism Kant Media / News Meditation mindfulness Photography Poetry Politics quicktakes Running Teaching Technology Thailand Theism/Atheism Theravada Tibet Tibetan Buddhism Travels Uncategorized Unitarian Universalism video Western Philosophy Zen

Select a Month June 2021 January 2021 November 2020 August 2020 July 2020 March 2020 January 2020 October 2019 August 2019 June 2019 May 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 April 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 December 2017 November 2017 October 2017 September 2017 August 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 November 2004 September 2004 August 2004

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz